Russian ambassador slams EU frozen assets plan for Ukraine

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen greets Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz (L) to discuss the use of frozen Russian assets to finance Ukraine, at the EU Commission in Brussels on December 5, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 December 2025
Follow

Russian ambassador slams EU frozen assets plan for Ukraine

  • “Any operation with sovereign Russian assets without Russia’s consent constitutes theft,” Sergey Nechaev said in a statement 
  • His statement came as EU leaders seek more ways to keep Ukraine afloat as it faces increasing pressure on the battlefield

BERLIN: A European Union plan to use frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine’s fight against Russia would have “far-reaching consequences” for the EU, Moscow’s ambassador to Germany warned on Friday.
His statement came as EU leaders seek more ways to keep Ukraine afloat as it faces increasing pressure on the battlefield.
“Any operation with sovereign Russian assets without Russia’s consent constitutes theft,” Sergey Nechaev said in a statement sent to AFP.
“It is also clear that the theft of Russian state funds will have far-reaching consequences,” the statement added.
The EU on Wednesday laid out a plan to use frozen Russian assets to help fund Ukraine with 90 billion euros over the next two years, despite opposition from Belgium, where the bulk of the assets are held.
But Nechaev said the “unprecedented step” could “destroy the business reputation of the European Union and plunge European governments into endless lawsuits.”
“In reality, it is a path to legal anarchy and the destruction of the foundations of the global financial system, which will primarily strike the European Union,” he said.
“We are confident that this is understood in Brussels and Berlin.”

‘Constructive exchange’: Merz 

European leaders are looking for fresh options as US President Donald Trump looks to end the war on terms they see as unfavorable to Kyiv.
They are seeking ways to fund a loan to Kyiv which, under the proposal, would be paid back by any eventual Russian reparations to Ukraine.
But Belgium, home to international deposit organization Euroclear — which holds most of the Russian assets — has so far rejected the proposal because of potential legal repercussions.
Nechaev said the plan showed that Europe did not have the “considerable resources” required to keep supporting Ukraine.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz met Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels on Friday to discuss the proposal.
In a statement after the meeting, Merz said it had been a “very constructive exchange.”
“Belgium’s particular concern about the question of utilising frozen Russian assets is undeniable and must be addressed in any conceivable solution in such a way that all European states bear the same risk,” he said.
The leaders agreed “to continue their discussions with the aim of finding a common solution” by their next summit on December 18 and 19, said Merz’s spokesman Stefan Kornelius.
 


Climate activist group files second lawsuit against Sweden

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Climate activist group files second lawsuit against Sweden

  • Sweden’s Supreme Court in February 2025 ruled that the complaint filed against the state was inadmissible
  • “We still have a chance to get out of the planetary crises and build a safe and fair world,” Edling said

STOCKHOLM: A group of climate activists said Friday they were filing another lawsuit against the Swedish state for alleged climate inaction, after the Supreme Court threw out their case last year.
The group behind the lawsuit, Aurora, first tried to sue the Swedish state in late 2022.
Sweden’s Supreme Court in February 2025 ruled that the complaint filed against the state — brought by an individual, with 300 other people joining it as a class action lawsuit — was inadmissible.
The court at the time noted the “very high requirements for individuals to have the right to bring such a claim” against a state.
“We still have a chance to get out of the planetary crises and build a safe and fair world. But this requires that rich countries that emit as much as Sweden stop breaking the law,” Aurora spokesperson Ida Edling said in a statement Friday.
The group, which said the lawsuit had been filed with the Stockholm District Court Friday, said it believes the Swedish state is obligated “to reduce Sweden’s emissions as much and as quickly as necessary in order for the country to be in line with its fair share.”
“This means that emissions from several sectors must reach zero before 2030,” the group said, while noting this was 15 years before Sweden’s currently set targets.
The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency as well as the OECD warned last year that Sweden was at risk of not reaching its own goal of net zero emissions by 2045.
While the first lawsuit was unsuccessful, the group noted that international courts had made several landmark decisions since the first suit was filed, spotlighting two in particular.
In an April 2024 decision, Europe’s top rights court, the European Court of Human Rights, ruled that Switzerland was not doing enough to tackle climate change, the first country ever to be condemned by an international tribunal for not taking sufficient action to curb global warming.
In 2025, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion stating that countries violating their climate obligations were committing an “unlawful” act.