Modi, Putin agree to deepen economic ties despite US pressure

1 / 2
Russian President Vladimir Putin shakes hands with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his ceremonial reception at India's presidential palace, Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on Dec. 5, 2025. (AFP)
2 / 2
Russian President Vladimir Putin is welcomed by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi upon arrival at the Palam Air Base in New Delhi, India. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 05 December 2025
Follow

Modi, Putin agree to deepen economic ties despite US pressure

  • India-Russia relations ‘have always stood the test of time,’ Modi says 
  • They signed 16 agreements, agreed to boost energy, connectivity ties

NEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to scale up and diversify economic cooperation during talks in New Delhi on Friday, showcasing deepening ties despite pressure from US President Donald Trump. 

Putin was on a two-day visit to India to co-chair with Modi the 23rd India-Russia Annual Summit, a key platform of their 25-year-Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership. 

The trip takes place amid Washington’s intensifying pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine and tense relations between the US and India, after Trump imposed hefty tariffs on Delhi and threatened sanctions over its historic ties with Moscow and its imports of Russian oil. 

In a joint press briefing following the Friday summit, Modi said India’s ties with Russia “have always stood the test of time” and had remained a “guiding star” for the past eight decades. 

“Today, we discussed all aspects of cooperation to further strengthen this foundation. Taking economic cooperation to new heights is our shared priority,” he said. 

“To realize this, today we have agreed on an Economic Cooperation Program until 2030. This will make our trade and investment diversified, balanced and sustainable, and will also add new dimensions to areas of cooperation.” 

Defense has traditionally been the main pillar of India-Russia ties, as Moscow is India’s largest defense supplier, accounting for an estimated 36 percent of arms imports and more than half of its military hardware.

But bilateral trade has been on the rise for the past two years, reaching $68.7 billion in 2024-25 fiscal year and dominated by Indian imports of Russian goods, particularly crude oil and petroleum products, government data showed. 

The two countries are now working to reach $100 billion by 2030 and to conclude a free trade agreement with the Eurasian Economic Union, as their leaders also agreed on Friday to strengthen collaboration across other areas, especially energy and connectivity. 

“Both the countries are trying to convey a message to the West, that they’ll not come under Western pressure,” said Prof Rajan Kumar of the School of International Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University. 

“India believes in the strategic economy, policy of multi-alignment. It will not come under any pressure from the West. So Putin’s visit is very important, India-Russia friendship is very important from that perspective.” 

For Russia, the visit was intended to show “the world that it remains a global power,” Prof. Harsh V. Pant, vice president of the Observer Research Foundation, told Arab News.

“It remains a power that has friends, that it is not as isolated as what the West might be trying to project Russia,” he said. 

“For India, this is a case of projecting its own sense of strategic autonomy in deciding how it wants to engage Russia, that despite American pressure, it has no intention of abandoning Russia, and it will continue to invest in its relationship with Russia.” 

India and Russia signed 16 agreements and memoranda of understanding on Friday, including one on labor mobility that would facilitate the movement of skilled and semi-skilled workers to and from the two countries. 

The Indian government also announced the launch of a free 30-day e-tourist visa for Russian nationals. 

“We are undoubtedly satisfied with the results of the negotiation we just had,” Putin said during the joint press briefing. 

“I can express my confidence that the current visit and the agreements will help the further deepening of the Russian-Indian strategic partnership for the benefit of our countries and the people, the peoples of India and Russia.”


WHO chief says reasons US gave for withdrawing ‘untrue’

Updated 25 January 2026
Follow

WHO chief says reasons US gave for withdrawing ‘untrue’

  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a joint statement Thursday that Washington had formally withdrawn from the WHO
  • And in a post on X, Tedros added: “Unfortunately, the reasons cited for the US decision to withdraw from WHO are untrue”

GENEVA: The head of the UN’s health agency on Saturday pushed back against Washington’s stated reasons for withdrawing from the World Health Organization, dismissing US criticism of the WHO as “untrue.”
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus warned that US announcement this week that it had formally withdrawn from the WHO “makes both the US and the world less safe.”
And in a post on X, he added: “Unfortunately, the reasons cited for the US decision to withdraw from WHO are untrue.”
He insisted: “WHO has always engaged with the US, and all Member States, with full respect for their sovereignty.”
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a joint statement Thursday that Washington had formally withdrawn from the WHO.
They accused the agency, of numerous “failures during the Covid-19 pandemic” and of acting “repeatedly against the interests of the United States.”
The WHO has not yet confirmed that the US withdrawal has taken effect.

- ‘Trashed and tarnished’ -

The two US officials said the WHO had “trashed and tarnished” the United States, and had compromised its independence.
“The reverse is true,” the WHO said in a statement.
“As we do with every Member State, WHO has always sought to engage with the United States in good faith.”
The agency strenuously rejected the accusation from Rubio and Kennedy that its Covid response had “obstructed the timely and accurate sharing of critical information that could have saved American lives and then concealed those failures.”
Kennedy also suggested in a video posted to X Friday that the WHO was responsible for “the Americans who died alone in nursing homes (and) the small businesses that were destroyed by reckless mandates” to wear masks and get vaccinated.
The US withdrawal, he insisted, was about “protecting American sovereignty, and putting US public health back in the hands of the American people.”
Tedros warned on X that the statement “contains inaccurate information.”
“Throughout the pandemic, WHO acted quickly, shared all information it had rapidly and transparently with the world, and advised Member States on the basis of the best available evidence,” the agency said.
“WHO recommended the use of masks, vaccines and physical distancing, but at no stage recommended mask mandates, vaccine mandates or lockdowns,” it added.
“We supported sovereign governments to make decisions they believed were in the best interests of their people, but the decisions were theirs.”

- Withdrawal ‘raises issues’ -

The row came as Washington struggled to dislodge itself from the WHO, a year after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to that effect.
The one-year withdrawal process reached completion on Thursday, but Kennedy and Rubio regretted in their statement that the UN health agency had “not approved our withdrawal and, in fact, claims that we owe it compensation.”
WHO has highlighted that when Washington joined the organization in 1948, it reserved the right to withdraw, as long as it gave one year’s notice and had met “its financial obligations to the organization in full for the current fiscal year.”
But Washington has not paid its 2024 or 2025 dues, and is behind around $260 million.
“The notification of withdrawal raises issues,” WHO said Saturday, adding that the topic would be examined during WHO’s Executive Board meeting next month and by the annual World Health Assembly meeting in May.
“We hope the US will return to active participation in WHO in the future,” Tedros said Saturday.
“Meanwhile, WHO remains steadfastly committed to working with all countries in pursuit of its core mission and constitutional mandate: the highest attainable standard of health as a fundamental right for all people.”