Pakistan bans ex-PM Khan’s sister from meeting him for allegedly violating prison rules

A screengrab taken from Pakistan's state television showing Minister for Information, Ataullah Tarar (left) and Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar addressing a press conference in Islamabad on December 4, 2025. (PTV Official/YouTube)
Short Url
Updated 04 December 2025
Follow

Pakistan bans ex-PM Khan’s sister from meeting him for allegedly violating prison rules

  • Pakistan information minister accuses Khanum of discussing political matters with brother, instigating masses against state
  • Uzma Khanum met her brother, ex-PM Khan, on Tuesday in Adiala Jail where he remains incarcerated on slew of charges

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar announced on Thursday that the government will not allow former prime minister Imran Khan’s sister to meet him anymore, accusing her of violating prison rules by indulging in political discussions during her visits. 

Khan’s sisters, Uzma Khanum and Aleema Khanum, met him at the Adiala Prison on Tuesday after being allowed by the authorities to do so. The former prime minister’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party and family members accused authorities of illegally denying them permission to visit the incarcerated leader in jail. 

Khan’s sisters had spoken to local and international media outlets last month, voicing concern over his safety as rumors of his death started doing the rounds on social media. However, Khanum quashed the rumors on Tuesday when she said her brother was “in good health” after meeting him.

Speaking to reporters at a news conference, Tarar accused Khanum and the former premier’s other sisters of attempting to create a “law and order situation” outside Adiala Prison in Rawalpindi. He alleged Khanum had partaken in political discussions with her brother, which was in violation of prison rules. 

“As per the rules, there is no room for political discussions, and it has been reported that political talk did take place, hence Uzma Khanum’s meetings have been banned from today,” Tarar said. 

The minister said Khan’s meetings with his sisters took place in the presence of the jail superintendent, alleging that discussions revolved around instigating the masses and on political matters. 

“Based on these violations, under any circumstances, the rules and code of conduct do not allow meetings to take place,” the minister said. “You were given a chance. Whoever violated [the rules] their meetings have been banned.”

This is what one gets for peacefully protesting. No criticism of the govt or The Army chief otherwise we can’t meet imran khan

Khan’s aide, Syed Zulfiqar Bukhari, criticized the information minister’s announcement. 

“This is what one gets for peacefully protesting,” Bukhari said in a text message shared with media. “No criticism of the govt or the army chief otherwise we can’t meet Imran Khan.”

Khan, who has been jailed on a slew of charges since August 2023, denies any wrongdoing and says cases against him are politically motivated to keep him and his party away from power. Pakistan’s government rejects the PTI’s claims he is being denied basic human rights in prison. 

Ousted from the prime minister’s office via a parliamentary vote in April 2022, Khan and his party have long campaigned against the military and government. He has accused the generals of ousting him together with his rivals. Khan’s opponents deny this, while the military says it does not meddle in politics.
 


Walnut tree remains ‘under arrest’ for over a century, living symbol of colonial power in Pakistan

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Walnut tree remains ‘under arrest’ for over a century, living symbol of colonial power in Pakistan

  • British officer is said to have ordered chaining of the tree in 1898, a reminder of the absolute authority and psychological control enforced under colonial rule in Khyber Pass region
  • Locals and historians say the shackled tree survives as a physical memory of the Frontier Crimes Regulation era, when even nature could be punished to discipline subjects and display power

LANDI KOTAL, KHYBER: In the military cantonment of Landi Kotal, close to Pakistan’s Torkham border crossing with Afghanistan and the mouth of the historic Khyber Pass, a single walnut tree stands bound in heavy iron chains.

It has been this way for more than a century, a surreal, almost absurd monument to the power structures and punitive imagination of the British Empire’s rule in the tribal frontier.

Black shackles still brace parts of its branches, giving it the appearance of a theatrical installation. To locals, it is a wound that never fully healed, a reminder that even nature could be punished when authority wished to show dominance.

Local oral histories trace the origin of this bizarre imprisonment to 1898, when a British officer named James Squid, allegedly intoxicated, believed the tree was moving toward him and instantly ordered it arrested. Soldiers carried out the instruction and the walnut tree has never been freed since.

Muhammad Sardar, the caretaker who oversees the site today, recounted the story as it has been passed down for generations.

“This British military official at that time was drunk and thought this walnut tree was moving toward him to attack him,” he told Arab News. “The officer ordered to arrest this tree, hence the soldiers had to obey the order and arrest this tree.”

Whether the event unfolded exactly as described is impossible to verify, but historians and residents agree on what the continued chaining represented: the unquestionable authority of colonial power.

A LAW THAT COULD BIND PEOPLE — AND TREES

Landi Kotal was one of the most militarized points of the British-controlled frontier, a strategic chokepoint along the Khyber Pass, a route armies, traders and empires have used for thousands of years. To control the region, the British introduced the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR), a law that denied locals the right to appeal, hire lawyers or challenge government decisions. Entire tribes could be punished for the suspected action of one member.

The chained walnut tree is often interpreted as a physical embodiment of that era: a warning made visible.

Dr. Syed Waqar Ali Shah, Assistant Professor of History at the University of Peshawar, said the symbolism was deliberate.

“It was an assertion of their [British] authority, it was a symbol of their power. Right. It’s a funny thing as well, because it’s something which was under the influence of some intoxication,” he explained.

“The officer behaved or gave orders for the imprisonment of that particular tree under the influence of some intoxicants.”

Dr. Shah continued:

“It was something which was a symbol of colonial authority, assertion of their authority, of bureaucratic diplomacy, a symbol of their bureaucratic strength and power, and maybe some cultural encounter as well.”

He added that such displays endured because “it was a cultural link between the locals and the colonial power. So it was a reflection of that. But later on, they continued with it in the presence of FCR (Frontier Crimes Regulation) and regulations like this.”

Even once the officer sobered, the chains remained.

Dr. Shah believes that was intentional: psychological messaging meant to instill conformity and fear in people living under colonial law.

“Their objective and purpose was to make it a symbol of discipline for the masses. It was an exhibition of power, a sheer exhibition of power, a symbol that if we can do this to something which was inhuman … if they can deal with a tree like this, so the general public, they should be aware that discipline is very important.”

Landi Kotal’s older residents say their fathers and grandfathers retold the story long before Pakistan existed and long before independence movements dismantled the Raj.

Usman Khan Shinwari, a 26-year-old shopkeeper, said the story continues to live in households like a family inheritance.

“My grandfather would often narrate this story of the arrested tree,” he recalled. “My grandfather would say that it shows how the then rulers were treating the locals and what our ancestors had endured.”

Over a century later, long after the end of British rule and the formal abolition of the Frontier Crimes Regulation in 2018, the walnut tree remains exactly where it was chained, part spectacle, part scar.

Tourists sometimes come to photograph it. Others stand silently before it.

But for many in Khyber, it is neither attraction nor curiosity.

It is proof that power once flowed one way only. A tree could be punished, so people learned not to resist.