Pentagon chief says US has ‘only just begun’ striking alleged drug boats

Above, US military personnel work around an Air Force MQ-9 Reaper drone at Rafael Hernandez Airport in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico on Nov. 30, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 02 December 2025
Follow

Pentagon chief says US has ‘only just begun’ striking alleged drug boats

  • “We’ve only just begun striking narco boats and putting narco-terrorists at the bottom of the ocean,” Hegseth said
  • Wilson also repeated the White House’s assertion that Admiral Frank Bradley made “the decision to re-strike the narco-terrorist vessel“

WASHINGTON: The United States has “only just begun” targeting alleged drug-trafficking boats, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth insisted Tuesday, despite a growing outcry over strikes that critics say amount to extrajudicial killings.
Hegseth and President Donald Trump’s administration have come under fire particularly over an incident in which US forces launched a follow-up strike on the wreckage of a vessel that had already been hit, reportedly killing two survivors.
Both the White House and Pentagon have sought to distance Hegseth from that decision — which some US lawmakers have said could be a war crime — instead pinning the blame on the admiral who directly oversaw the operation.
“We’ve only just begun striking narco boats and putting narco-terrorists at the bottom of the ocean, because they’ve been poisoning the American people,” Hegseth said during a Tuesday cabinet meeting.
“We’ve had a bit of a pause because it’s hard to find boats to strike right now — which is the entire point, right? Deterrence has to matter,” Hegseth said.
The Pentagon chief said he watched the first strike but “did not personally see survivors,” while also defending the second attack, saying it was the “correct decision to ultimately sink the boat and eliminate the threat.”
Earlier on Tuesday, Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson insisted that the strikes were legal.
The operations “are lawful under both US and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict,” she told a news conference.

- Hegseth backs follow-on strikes -

Wilson also repeated the White House’s assertion that Admiral Frank Bradley — who now leads US Special Operations Command — made “the decision to re-strike the narco-terrorist vessel,” saying the senior Navy officer was “operating under clear and long-standing authorities to ensure the boat was destroyed.”
“Any follow-on strikes like those which were directed by Admiral Bradley, the secretary 100 percent agrees with,” she added.
Wilson spoke to a friendly audience, with dozens of journalists who refused to sign a new restrictive Pentagon media policy earlier in the year barred from the event.
Trump’s administration insists it is effectively at war with alleged “narco-terrorists” and began carrying out strikes in early September on vessels it says were transporting drugs — a campaign that has so far left more than 80 dead.
The follow-up strike that killed survivors took place on September 2 and would appear to run afoul of the Pentagon’s own Law of War Manual, which states that “orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal.”
Democratic senators have slammed the September 2 strikes, with Jacky Rosen and Chris Van Hollen saying the incident may be a war crime, and Chris Murphy accusing Hegseth of “passing the buck.”
Trump has deployed the world’s biggest aircraft and an array of other military assets to the Caribbean, insisting they are there for counter-narcotics operations.
Regional tensions have flared as a result of the strikes and the military buildup, with Venezuela’s leftist leader Nicolas Maduro accusing Washington of using drug trafficking as a pretext for “imposing regime change” in Caracas.
Maduro, whose re-election last year was rejected by Washington as fraudulent, insists there is no drug cultivation in Venezuela, which he says is used as a trafficking route for Colombian cocaine against its will.


SpaceX acquires xAI in record-setting deal as Musk looks to unify AI and space ambitions

Updated 03 February 2026
Follow

SpaceX acquires xAI in record-setting deal as Musk looks to unify AI and space ambitions

  • The deal is the biggest M&A transaction of all time
  • Deal values xAI at $250 billion, SpaceX at $1 trillion

Elon Musk said on Monday ​that SpaceX has acquired his artificial-intelligence startup xAI in a record-setting deal that unifies Musk’s AI and space ambitions by combining the rocket-and-satellite company with the maker of the Grok chatbot. The deal, first reported by Reuters last week, represents one of the most ambitious tie-ups in the technology sector yet, combining a space-and-defense contractor with a fast-growing AI developer whose costs are largely driven by chips, data centers and energy. It could also bolster SpaceX’s data-center ambitions as Musk competes with rivals like Alphabet’s Google, Meta, Amazon-backed Anthropic ‌and OpenAI in the ‌AI sector.
The transaction values SpaceX at $1 trillion, and ‌xAI ⁠at $250 ​billion, according ‌to a person familiar with the matter.
“This marks not just the next chapter, but the next book in SpaceX and xAI’s mission: scaling to make a sentient sun to understand the Universe and extend the light of consciousness to the stars!” Musk said. The purchase of xAI sets a new record for the world’s largest M&A deal, a distinction held for more than 25 years when Vodafone bought Germany’s Mannesmann in a hostile takeover valued at $203 billion ⁠in 2000, according to data compiled by LSEG. The combined company of SpaceX and xAI is expected to price shares ‌at about $527 each, another person familiar with the matter said. ‍SpaceX was already the world’s most ‍valuable privately held company, last valued at $800 billion in a recent insider share sale. ‍XAI was last valued at $230 billion in November, according to the Wall Street Journal. The merger comes as the space company plans a blockbuster public offering this year that could value it at over $1.5 trillion, two people familiar with the matter said.
SpaceX, xAI and Musk did not immediately respond ​to requests for comment.
The deal further consolidates Musk’s far-flung business empire and fortunes into a tighter, mutually reinforcing ecosystem – what some investors and analysts informally ⁠call the “Muskonomy” – which already includes Tesla, brain-chip maker Neuralink and tunnel firm the Boring Company. The world’s richest man has a history of merging his ventures together. Musk folded social media platform X into xAI through a share swap last year, giving the AI startup access to the platform’s data and distribution. In 2016, he used Tesla’s stock to buy his solar-energy company SolarCity.
The agreement could draw scrutiny from regulators and investors over governance, valuation and conflicts of interest given Musk’s overlapping leadership roles across multiple firms, as well as the potential movement of engineers, proprietary technology and contracts between entities.
SpaceX also holds billions of dollars in federal contracts with NASA, the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies, which all have some authority ‌to review M&A transactions for national security and other risks.