Islamabad accuses Kabul of ‘instigating Pashtunism’ in Pakistan amid heightened tensions

The screengrab taken from the press conference of Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs shows the foreign office’s spokesperson Tahir Andrabi, addressing the weekly media briefing in Islamabad on November 14, 2025. (MOFA)
Short Url
Updated 14 November 2025
Follow

Islamabad accuses Kabul of ‘instigating Pashtunism’ in Pakistan amid heightened tensions

  • Tensions have been high between Pakistan and Afghanistan in recent years, with Islamabad accusing Kabul of harboring militant groups
  • Clashes erupted between the neighbors on Oct. 11 after Pakistan conducted airstrikes in Afghanistan against what it called militant targets

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad on Friday accused the Afghan Taliban government of “instigating Pashtunism” in Pakistan, amid heightened tensions between the neighbors over a surge in militancy in Pakistan.

Tensions have been high between Pakistan and Afghanistan in recent years, with Islamabad accusing Kabul of harboring militant groups like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). Kabul has consistently denied this.

Clashes erupted between the neighbors on Oct. 11 after Pakistan conducted airstrikes in Afghanistan against what it said were TTP-linked targets. The two sides reached a ceasefire in Doha on Oct. 19, but two subsequent rounds of talks in Istanbul failed to firm up the truce.

Speaking at a weekly press briefing in Islamabad, Pakistani foreign office spokesman Tahir Andrabi said some elements within the Afghan Taliban have made an attempt to “instigate” Pashtun sentiment in Pakistan. He did not offer any evidence, while Kabul did not immediately respond to the comment.

“It is a historical fact that Pashtuns in Pakistan are a vibrant part of our society and the state, holding leadership position across the spectrum of public life and civil society. More number of Pashtuns live in Pakistan than in Afghanistan,” Andrabi told reporters on Friday.

“Therefore, instead of instigating Pashtunism in Pakistan, it would be wise for Taliban regime to look into its own credentials of inclusivity across all segments of this population in its governance structure.”

Pashtunism, often framed in political discourse as Pashtun nationalism, refers to the idea of uniting Pashtun-speaking communities under a shared ethnic, cultural or political identity. While Pashtuns constitute one of the largest ethnic groups in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, they have been divided by the 2,600-kilometer border, known as Durand Line, named after British diplomat Sir Mortimer Durand who drew the boundary in the late 19th century with the agreement of Afghan authorities of the day.

The Taliban government, like many previous Afghan administrations, does not recognize the border known as the Durand Line and describes it as “imaginary.” Pakistani officials maintain that Kabul’s rhetoric on Pashtun unity have occasionally been deployed to stir sentiment within Pakistan, particularly during periods of strained bilateral relations.

The Pakistani foreign office spokesman once again blamed the rise in militancy in Pakistan on Afghanistan-based militant groups.

“With evidence-based and well-documented sharp rise in terrorism emanating from Afghanistan into Pakistan after August 2021, the Taliban regime can neither deny the reality nor absolve itself of this responsibility,” Andrabi said.

He, however, reiterated Pakistan’s commitment to resolution of bilateral differences through dialogue: “Pakistan’s core concerns, that is terrorism emanating from Afghanistan, need to be addressed first and foremost.”


Rating firm S&P says it won’t rush Iran war downgrades, sees risks for countries like Pakistan

Updated 12 March 2026
Follow

Rating firm S&P says it won’t rush Iran war downgrades, sees risks for countries like Pakistan

  • Agency says it is monitoring indebted energy importers as higher oil prices strain finances
  • Gulf economies seen better placed to weather shock, though Bahrain flagged as vulnerable

LONDON: S&P Global ‌said it would not make any knee-jerk sovereign rating cuts following the outbreak of war in the ​Middle East, but warned on Thursday that soaring oil and gas prices were putting a number of already cash-strapped countries at risk.

The firm’s top analysts said in a webinar that the conflict, which has involved US and Israeli strikes ‌against Iran and Iranian ‌strikes against Israel, ​US ‌bases ⁠and Gulf ​states, ⁠was now moving from a low- to moderate-risk scenario.

Most Gulf countries had enough fiscal buffers, however, to weather the crisis for a while, with more lowly rated Bahrain the only clear exception.

Qatar’s banking sector could ⁠also struggle if there were significant ‌deposit outflows in ‌reaction to the conflict, although there ​was no evidence ‌of such strains at the moment, they ‌said.

“We don’t want to jump the gun and just say things are bad,” S&P’s head global sovereign analyst, Roberto Sifon-Arevalo, said.

The longer the crisis ‌was prolonged, though, “the more difficult it is going to be,” he ⁠added.

Sifon-Arevalo ⁠said Asia was the second-most exposed region, due to many of its countries being significant Gulf oil and gas importers.

India, Thailand and Indonesia have relatively lower reserves of oil, while the region also had already heavily indebted countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka whose finances would be further hurt by rising energy prices.

“We ​are closely monitoring ​these (countries) to see how the credit stories evolve,” Sifon-Arevalo said.