Pakistan government widens coalition consultations on sweeping 27th constitutional amendment

A delegation of MQM-P led by Convener Dr. Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui called on Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in Islamabad on November 6, 2025. (Government of Pakistan)
Short Url
Updated 06 November 2025
Follow

Pakistan government widens coalition consultations on sweeping 27th constitutional amendment

  • Amendment could reshape judicial authority and provincial revenue arrangements
  • PPP and MQM reviewing proposals as government seeks two-thirds parliament support

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s government has expanded consultations with coalition partners on the proposed 27th constitutional amendment, the prime minister’s office said on Thursday, as political negotiations intensify ahead of the bill’s expected introduction in parliament.

The amendment is under discussion with key parties in the governing alliance, including the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q), in a bid to secure the two-thirds parliamentary majority required for constitutional changes.

According to political leaders privy to the issue, the amendment proposes creating a new constitutional court, restoring executive magistrates, revising the distribution of federal revenue among provinces and making changes to how senior judges and military leadership appointments are structured within the constitution.

Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif’s office said in a statement on Thursday the premier met a four-member delegation of the PML-Q led by Federal Minister for Overseas Pakistanis Chaudhry Salik Hussain.

“The proposed 27th constitutional amendment was discussed and consultations were held in the meeting,” the statement said. 




A delegation from the PML-Q, led by Federal Minister for Overseas Pakistanis and Human Resource Development Chaudhry Salik Hussain, called on Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif in Islamabad on November 6, 2025. (Government of Pakistan)

In a post on X earlier this week, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari said the government had also asked his party to support the amendment.

“Proposal includes setting up constitutional court, executive magistrates, transfer of judges, removal of protection of provincial share in NFC, amending Article 243, return of education and population planning to the federation and breaking deadlock on appointment of ECP,” Bhutto-Zardari wrote.

The National Finance Commission (NFC) award determines how federal tax revenue is distributed among Pakistan’s provinces and is considered a core pillar of the country’s federal structure. Executive magistrates previously granted local officials limited judicial powers over minor offenses — a system abolished in 2001 in reforms aimed at separating the judiciary and executive authority.

Article 243 of Pakistan’s constitution defines the command and control of the armed forces and outlines how the military leadership is appointed on the advice of the prime minister. The reference to resolving the “deadlock” in appointing members of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) relates to ongoing disputes over the mechanism for nominating and approving the country’s top electoral officials.

Constitutional amendments in Pakistan have historically been used to reshape the balance of power between the legislature, judiciary and provinces. The proposed 27th amendment follows the 26th amendment passed in October 2024, which gave parliament a role in appointing the chief justice and created a new panel of senior judges to hear constitutional cases — measures critics said weakened judicial independence.

Pakistan’s constitution, adopted in 1973, has been amended more than two dozen times, often reflecting shifts in authority among civilian governments and the military. Provisions governing the NFC award are among the most politically sensitive because they underpin the country’s federal structure and provincial autonomy.

Legal analysts say the amendment could become one of Pakistan’s most consequential constitutional revisions in decades, potentially reshaping judicial oversight, the command structure of the armed forces and the financial autonomy of provinces.

The government has not yet announced when exactly the amendment will be formally tabled in parliament.

Former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, the largest opposition party in the country, has pledged to oppose the amendment and has called for the full draft text to be made public.


Pakistan’s Afghan salvo risks turning ‘open war’ into long crisis

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan’s Afghan salvo risks turning ‘open war’ into long crisis

  • Nuclear-armed Pakistan has a formidable military of 660,000 active personnel, backed by a fleet of 465 combat aircraft
  • But the Taliban have the option to lean on insurgent groups like the TTP and the BLA to move beyond border skirmishes

KARACHI: Weeks after the Taliban’s lightning offensive in 2021 wrested control of Afghanistan from a US-led military coalition, Pakistan’s then intelligence chief flew into the capital Kabul for talks, where the serving lieutenant general told a reporter: “Don’t worry, everything will be okay.”

Five years on, Islamabad — long seen as a patron of the Taliban — is locked in its heaviest fighting with the group, which Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif described on Friday (February 27) as an “open war.”

The turmoil means that a wide swathe of Asia — from the Gulf to the Himalayas — is now in flux, with the United States building up a military deployment against Afghanistan’s neighbor Iran even as relations between Pakistan and arch rival India remain on edge after four days of fighting last May.

At the heart of the conflict with Afghanistan is Pakistan’s accusation that the Afghan Taliban provides support to militant groups, including the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), that have wreaked havoc across inside the South Asian country.

The Afghan Taliban, which has previously fought alongside the TTP, denies the charge, insisting that Pakistan’s security situation is its internal problem.

The disagreement is a reflection of starkly incompatible positions taken by both sides, as Pakistan expected compliance after decades of support to the Taliban, which did not see itself beholden to Islamabad, analysts said.

“We all know that the government in Pakistan supported the Taliban, the Afghan Taliban for many years, in the 90s and the 2000s, and provided havens to them during the period where the US and NATO were in Afghanistan.

So there’s a very close relationship between the Taliban and Pakistan,” said Jennifer Brick Murtazashvili, a political scientist at the University of Pittsburgh and an Afghanistan expert.

“It’s really surprising and shocking to many of us to see how quickly this relationship deteriorated,” she said.

Although tensions have simmered along their rugged 2,600-km (1,615-mile) frontier for months, following clashes last October, Friday’s fighting is notable because of Pakistan’s use of warplanes to hit Taliban military installations instead of confining the attacks to the militants it allegedly harbors.

These include targets deep inside the country in Kabul, as well as the southern city of Kandahar, the seat of Taliban supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada, according to Pakistan military spokesman Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry.

The clashes are unlikely to end there.

“I think in the immediate aftermath, I think hostilities will subside. There will be, I hope there will be a ceasefire through mediation. But I do not see these tensions subsiding in the foreseeable future,” said Abdul Basit,  an expert on militancy and violent extremism at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

Nuclear-armed Pakistan has a formidable military of 660,000 active personnel, backed by a fleet of 465 combat aircraft, several thousand armored fighting vehicles and artillery pieces.

Across the border, the Afghan Taliban has only around 172,000 active military personnel, a smattering of armored vehicles and no real air force.

But the battle-hardened group, which took on a phalanx of Western military powers in 2001 and outlasted them, has the option to lean on insurgents like the TTP and the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), moving beyond border skirmishes.

Based in Pakistan’s largest and poorest province of Balochistan that borders both Iran and Afghanistan, the BLA has been at the center of a decades-long insurgency, which in recent years has staged large coordinated attacks.

Pakistan has long accused India of backing the insurgents, a charge repeatedly denied by New Delhi, which has retained a robust military deployment along the border since last May.

Although a raft of countries with influence — including China, Russia, Turkiye and Qatar — have indicated an openness to help mediate the conflict, all such efforts have been met with limited success so far.