US aid flows to Nigeria anti-landmine efforts — for now

A Nigerian soldier from the Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) uses a metal detector to search for IEDs in Monguno, Borno state, Nigeria. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 29 October 2025
Follow

US aid flows to Nigeria anti-landmine efforts — for now

  • US funds help UNMAS provide education for rural farmers and displaced persons on how to detect mines, IEDs and unexploded ordnance from the conflict and how to report them for removal

MAIDUGURI: When the United States suddenly moved to dismantle its foreign aid system earlier this year, the UN’s land mine safety and removal project in Nigeria braced for impact.
Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and unexploded ordnance killed or injured 418 civilians in northeast Nigeria in 2024, more than double the year prior — but workers knew the severity of the crisis was no guarantee that the program would survive.
US President Donald Trump’s cuts came for everything, from malaria treatment to emergency food for starving people.
But then, nothing happened.
“We were very surprised,” said Edwin Faigmane, program chief for the UN Mine Action Service in Nigeria, noting USAID accounted for 20 percent of its funding.
The dismantling of USAID, Washington’s main foreign aid arm, has been catastrophic for people across the world. It has also been confusing.
Faigmane said he “couldn’t really get an answer” for why UNMAS survived cuts in Nigeria, where a violent jihadist insurgency has been raging since Boko Haram’s 2009 uprising.
Earlier this year, AFP reported that malaria clinics in Borno state, the epicenter of the violence, had shut down after USAID funding stopped.
UNMAS’s mission in Mali ended when USAID — its sole sponsor — cut its funding. Washington also clawed back funding for UNMAS in Sudan.
Earlier this year, UNMAS pre-emptively stopped its USAID-funded operations, until Faigmane got confirmation from USAID officials in Abuja, the capital, that they could continue as normal.
“We were able to deploy some other teams in the areas that we were supposed to cover with the USAID funding” during the pre-emptive suspension, Faigmane told AFP. “We were able to survive because of our other donors.”
US funds help UNMAS provide education for rural farmers and displaced persons on how to detect mines, IEDs and unexploded ordnance from the conflict — and how to report them for removal.
With funds from other donors, UNMAS also trains security personnel on disposal — a crucial job as Nigeria builds up a fledgling National Mine Action Center established in 2024.
The US State Department did not respond to a request for comment.

- Civilians on the frontlines -

At the El-Miskin displacement camp in Maiduguri, the Borno state capital, workers from the local nonprofit The Big Smile Foundation gather groups for education sessions.
This camp’s activities are funded by other donors, but the Americans’ presence is still felt: USAID logos adorn education materials, including a chutes-and-ladders style game for children.
“We’ve learned how to stay safe... how to mark (suspected) ordnance from a distance, and report it to the community leader,” said Hauwa Inusa, a 60-year-old camp resident who fled her home a decade ago.
She might be forced to use her training soon: the Borno state government has marked the camp for closure.
With violence down from its peak a decade ago, the government in recent years has been shutting down camps and sending people back to the countryside.
But swathes of the rural northeast remain outside of government control.
The long-abandoned town of Darul Jamal, near the Cameroonian border, was recently repopulated with its former residents only for jihadists to massacre scores of them in a September raid.
UNMAS meanwhile isn’t out of the woods yet. After some initial uncertainty, Faigmane said, another tranche of US funding, some $225,000, arrived a few weeks ago, which should last until March 2026.
But if the United States eventually pulls out, “our reach collapses.”


Youth voters take center stage in Bangladesh election after student-led regime change

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Youth voters take center stage in Bangladesh election after student-led regime change

  • About 45% of Bangladeshis eligible to vote in Thursday’s election are aged 18-33
  • Election follows 18 months of reforms after the end of Sheikh Hasina’s 15-year rule

DHAKA: When he goes to the polls on Thursday, Atikur Rahman Toha will vote for the first time, believing that this election can bring democratic change to Bangladesh.

A philosophy student at Dhaka University, Toha was already eligible to vote in the 2024 poll but, like many others, he opted out.

“I didn’t feel motivated to even go to vote,” he said. “That was a truly one-sided election. The election system was fully corrupted. That’s why I felt demotivated. But this time I am truly excited to exercise my voting rights for the first time.”

The January 2024 vote was widely criticized by both domestic and international observers and marred by a crackdown on the opposition and allegations of voter fraud.

But the victory of the Awami League of ex-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was short-lived, as a few months later the government was ousted by a student-led uprising, which ended the 15-year rule of Bangladesh’s longest-serving leader.

The interim administration, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, took control in August 2024 and prepared a series of reforms to restructure the country’s political and institutional framework and organize the upcoming vote.

About 127.7 million Bangladeshis are eligible to cast their ballots, according to Election Commission data, with nearly a third of them, or 40.4 million, aged 18-29. Another 16.9 million are 30-33, making it a youth–dominated poll, with the voters hopeful the outcome will help continue the momentum of the 2024 student-led uprising.

“We haven’t yet fully transitioned into a democratic process. And there is no fully stable situation in the country,” Toha said. “After the election we truly hope that the situation will change.”

For Rawnak Jahan Rakamoni, also a Dhaka University student, who is graduating in information science, voting this time meant that her voice would count.

“We are feeling that we are heard, we will be heard, our opinion will matter,” she said.

“I think it is a very important moment for our country, because after many years of controversial elections, people are finally getting a chance to exercise their voting rights and people are hoping that this election will be more meaningful and credible. This should be a fair election.”

But despite the much wider representation than before, the upcoming vote will not be entirely inclusive in the absence of the Awami League, which still retains a significant foothold.

The Election Commission last year barred Hasina’s party from contesting the next national elections, after the government banned Awami League’s activities citing national security threats and a war crimes investigation against the party’s top leadership.

The UN Human Rights Office has estimated that between July 15 and Aug. 5, 2024 the former government and its security and intelligence apparatus, together with “violent elements” linked to the Awami League, “engaged systematically in serious human rights violations and abuses in a coordinated effort to suppress the protest movement.”

It estimated that at least 1,400 people were killed during the protests, with the majority shot dead from military rifles.

Rezwan Ahmed Rifat, a law student, wanted the new government to “ensure justice for the victims of the July (uprising), enforced disappearances, and other forms of torture” carried out by the previous regime.

The two main parties out of the 51 contesting Thursday’s vote are the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Jamaat-e-Islami. Jamaat, which in 2013 was banned from political participation by Hasina’s government, heads an 11-party alliance, including the National Citizen Party formed by student leaders from the 2024 movement.

“I see this election as a turning point of our country’s democratic journey … It’s not just a normal election,” said Falguni Ahmed, a psychology student who will head to the polls convinced that no matter who wins, it will result in the “democratic accountability” of the next government.

Ahmed added: “People are not voting only for their leaders; they are also voting for the restoration of democratic credibility. That’s why this election is very different.”