South Africa seeks to save birds from wind turbine risks

A bird monitor looks out for endangered birds close to the wind turbines at Excelsior Wind Farm near Swellendam, S Africa. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 23 October 2025
Follow

South Africa seeks to save birds from wind turbine risks

  • With more than 1,400 turbines operating across South Africa, an estimated 6,000 birds die this way a year, ten percent are endangered species
  • To mitigate the impact, Excelsior Wind Farm has implemented a Shutdown on Demand Protocol that prioritizes six vulnerable species, including the Cape vulture and endangered black harrier

SWELLENDAM: Powerful gusts shook an observation post perched on a hill at a wind farm in South Africa as two monitors scanned the landscape through binoculars.
The Overberg mountains stretched along the horizon, but the monitors — bundled in scarves — were focused on activity much closer: around a giant wind turbine, a small, dark silhouette had appeared.
“Stop turbine 11, please. Cape vulture,” one said into a walkie-talkie. “Stopping turbine 11,” came the reply.
Immediately, the blades of the 150-meter (500-feet) turbine began to slow, coming to a complete stop in less than a minute.
BirdLife South Africa estimates that every year an average 4.25 birds are killed per wind turbine, most often when they fly into blades that can reach speeds of up to 280 kilometers (175 miles) per hour.
With more than 1,400 turbines operating across South Africa, an estimated 6,000 birds die this way a year, the group says. Ten percent are endangered species.
To mitigate the impact, Excelsior Wind Farm has implemented a Shutdown on Demand Protocol that prioritizes six vulnerable species, including the Cape vulture and endangered black harrier.
When monitors spot one, “they inform the control room via radio and that’s when they will turn off the turbine,” said conservationist Clarissa Mars, who oversees the program at the farm 200 kilometers east of Cape Town.
“That takes approximately 43 seconds,” she told AFP.
“There were less than eight fatalities for the site in approximately five years,” Mars said. “And I’m just very happy knowing there were no fatalities this year.”
The Stop on Demand Protocol — developed in the late 2010s, notably in Kenya — has been adopted worldwide and was introduced at Excelsior in 2020.
Its impact on energy output at its small operation of 13 turbines has been negligible, said site manager Jacques Redelinghuys.
“We’ve lost less than 0.5 percent of revenue due to the program,” he said. “And on days like today, when we do produce more due to our high wind speed, we make up for the losses that we incurred.”

- Extinction by wind farm? -

While the shutdown protocol has saved some species from the blades at Excelsior, such as the Cape vulture, it has been less effective for the black harrier, a critically endangered bird of which only around 1,300 remain in the world.
The smaller bird is harder for the monitors to spot, conservationist Odette Curtis-Scott said.
The Overberg region is a vital breeding ground for the black harrier, but 95 percent of its natural habitat here has been lost to agriculture, she said.
This forces the bird to travel further in search of water and prey, increasing the risks of colliding with turbines.
“It’s not ideal that the wind farm is where it is,” said Curtis-Scott, who heads the Overberg Renosterveld Trust.
In early 2025, the trust bought land five kilometers from Excelsior where there is a black harrier colony and about 40 return to breed each year.
Despite the efforts, around 13 black harriers have been killed at South Africa’s more than 30 wind farms in the past decade, according to University of Cape Town professor Rob Simmons.
“If we were to kill an extra three to five adult black harriers per year through wind farms, the population will go extinct within 75 to 100 years,” he said.
“It’s one of the first species in South Africa, possibly even in Africa, for which we know that wind farms can have a direct effect on the potential extinction.”
Another potential solution to this “green-green dilemma” is painting turbine blades, Simmons said.
“Birds do not see black and white contrasts as well as we do,” he said. “They, therefore, do not see a white blade spinning against a cloudy sky. This is very likely why they do not avoid it.”
An experiment at a wind farm 90 kilometers north of Cape Town, where blades were painted with bold red stripes, resulted in a 87 percent drop in bird mortality over two years, he said.
“We cannot continue burning fossil fuels,” he said. “Some species, like the black harrier, will not survive climate change. But we also cannot sacrifice numerous birds on the altar of renewable energy.”


Trump administration expands ICE authority to detain refugees

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

Trump administration expands ICE authority to detain refugees

  • Under US law, refugees must apply for lawful permanent resident status one year after their arrival in the country
WASHINGTON: The Trump administration has given immigration officers broader powers to detain legal refugees awaiting a green card to ensure they are “re-vetted,” an apparent expansion of ​the president’s wide-ranging crackdown on legal and illegal immigration, according to a government memo.
The US Department of Homeland Security, in a memo dated February 18 and submitted in a federal court filing, said refugees must return to government custody for “inspection and examination” a year after their admission into the United States.
“This detain-and-inspect requirement ensures that refugees are re-vetted after one year, aligns post-admission vetting with that ‌applied to ‌other applicants for admission, and promotes public ​safety,” ‌the ⁠department said ​in ⁠the memo.
Under US law, refugees must apply for lawful permanent resident status one year after their arrival in the country. The new memo authorizes immigration authorities to detain individuals for the duration of the re-inspection process.
The new policy is a shift from the earlier 2010 memorandum, which stated that failure to obtain lawful permanent resident status ⁠was not a “basis” for removal from the country ‌and not a “proper basis” for ‌detention.
The DHS did not respond to ​a Reuters request for comment outside ‌regular business hours.
The decision has prompted criticism from refugee advocacy groups.
AfghanEvac’s ‌president Shawn VanDiver called the directive “a reckless reversal of long-standing policy” and said it “breaks faith with people the United States lawfully admitted and promised protection.”
HIAS, formerly known as the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, said the “move ‌will cause grave harm to thousands of people who were welcomed to the United States after ⁠fleeing violence ⁠and persecution.” Under President Donald Trump, the number of people in ICE detention reached about 68,000 this month, up about 75 percent from when he took office last year.
Trump’s hard-line immigration agenda was a potent campaign issue that helped him win the 2024 election.
A US judge in January temporarily blocked a recently announced Trump administration policy targeting the roughly 5,600 lawful refugees in Minnesota who are awaiting green cards.
In a written ruling, US District Judge John Tunheim in Minneapolis said federal agents likely violated multiple federal statutes by ​arresting some of these refugees ​to subject them to additional vetting.