One year on, Italian migrant camps in Albania near-empty

One year after Italy opened migrant camps in Albania intended to hold people intercepted at sea, the legally contested centres lie almost empty. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 16 October 2025
Follow

One year on, Italian migrant camps in Albania near-empty

  • Numerous NGOs have criticized living conditions inside the camps, and Italian courts have struck down several attempted deportations to Albania
  • The court cited disagreements over the list of “safe” origin countries created by the Italian government

SHENGIN, Albania: One year after Italy opened migrant camps in Albania intended to hold people intercepted at sea, the legally contested centers lie almost empty.
Numerous NGOs have criticized living conditions inside the camps, and Italian courts have struck down several attempted deportations to Albania.
But as the European Union discusses the possibility of creating its own “return hubs,” Italy’s far-right government appears committed to sending migrants to offshore detention centers in Albania.

- ‘Very concerning’ -

On October 16, 2024, two detention centers opened in the port of Shengjin and the village of Gjader, located in northern Albania but managed by Rome.
That same day, dozens of cameras filmed the arrival of the first Italian naval ship carrying 16 men from Egypt and Bangladesh, arrested at sea as they tried to reach the EU.
Their identities were first verified at the port. Then they were sent to the Gjader camp, where they could wait for an asylum claim to be processed if they lodged one.
But very quickly, four of the men were identified as “vulnerable” and sent back to Italy.
Within two days, the remaining 12 men would be sent back too, after an Italian court ruled against their detention.
The court cited disagreements over the list of “safe” origin countries created by the Italian government, which included nations that do not meet European legal criteria.
A year later, Italian judges have repeatedly rejected deportations, slowing plans to place up to 3,000 migrants in the camp.
According to legal expert Gianfranco Schiavone, a report by Italian NGOs found that in all, 132 people were sent to the Albanian centers.
Of them, only 32 have been repatriated, although details on how many were returned to Italy or sent to another country are unclear.
It is also hard to obtain official confirmation about the program details and camp conditions — the Albanian authorities referred AFP’s query to the Italians, who did not answer specific questions about the scheme.
“The situation is very concerning due to the extreme difficulty for detainees to exercise their fundamental rights in general,” Schiavone said.
According to a report by a group of NGOs, at least nine people have attempted suicide while being held in the camps, and there have been 21 cases of self-mutilation.

- ‘The Italian experiment’ -

Amid ongoing legal battles, Italy plans to use the camps as detention facilities for people awaiting deportation after already being deemed to be “illegal” migrants by Italian authorities.
This repurposing will also likely be blocked by European courts, Schiavone said.
“There is no provision for the administrative detention of foreigners awaiting expulsion in Italy to be carried out in a non-EU country.”
But this could change in a few months if the “return regulation,” currently under debate in the European Parliament, is adopted: the framework would open the way to the creation of migrant centers outside the EU’s borders.
Since her election in 2022, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has made fighting irregular immigration a key policy of her government.
The legalization of Meloni’s experiment would represent a significant political win for her far-right Fratelli d’Italia (FDI) party.
But Filippo Furri from the Italian NGO ARCI said that he hopes the EU reconsiders this approach and instead deems it “illegal or economically unsustainable.”
Meanwhile, the risk for people migrating is that “this Italian experiment spreads to other countries,” he said.
During a visit to Albania in May, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer expressed his desire to create “return hubs.”
But his Albanian counterpart Edi Rama was reluctant to open another program in his country and said the Italian model “takes time to test.”
“If it works, it can be replicated. But not in Albania, elsewhere in the region,” Rama said.


Ukraine drops NATO goal as Trump envoy sees progress in peace talks

Updated 57 min 18 sec ago
Follow

Ukraine drops NATO goal as Trump envoy sees progress in peace talks

  • The move marks a major shift for Ukraine, which has fought to join NATO as a safeguard against Russian attacks and has such an aspiration included in its constitution

BERLIN/KYIV: President Volodymyr Zelensky offered to drop Ukraine’s aspirations to join the NATO military alliance as he held five hours of talks with US envoys in Berlin on Sunday to end the war with Russia, with negotiations set to continue on Monday.
Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff said “a lot of progress was made” as he and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner met Zelensky in the latest push to end Europe’s bloodiest conflict since World War Two, though full details were not divulged.
Zelensky’s adviser Dmytro Lytvyn said the president would comment on the talks on Monday once they were completed. Officials, Lytvyn said, were considering the draft documents.
“They went on for more than five hours and ended for today with an agreement to resume tomorrow morning,” Lytvyn told reporters in a WhatsApp chat.
Ahead of the talks, Zelensky offered to drop Ukraine’s goal to join NATO in exchange for Western security guarantees.
The move marks a major shift for Ukraine, which has fought to join NATO as a safeguard against Russian attacks and has such an aspiration included in its constitution. It also meets one of Russia’s war aims, although Kyiv has so far held firm against ceding territory to Moscow.
“Representatives held in-depth discussions regarding the 20-point plan for peace, economic agendas, and more. A lot of progress was made, and they will meet again tomorrow morning,” Witkoff said in a post on X.
The talks were hosted by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who a source said had made brief remarks before leaving the two sides to negotiate. Other European leaders are also due in Germany for talks on Monday.
“From the very beginning, Ukraine’s desire was to join NATO, these are real security guarantees. Some partners from the US and Europe did not support this direction,” Zelensky said in answer to questions from reporters in a WhatsApp chat.
“Thus, today, bilateral security guarantees between Ukraine and the US, Article 5-like guarantees for us from the US, and security guarantees from European colleagues, as well as other countries — Canada, Japan — are an opportunity to prevent another Russian invasion,” Zelensky said.
“And it is already a compromise on our part,” he said, adding the security guarantees should be legally binding.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly demanded Ukraine officially renounce its NATO ambitions and withdraw troops from the about 10 percent of Donbas which Kyiv still controls. Moscow has also said Ukraine must be a neutral country and no NATO troops can be stationed in Ukraine.
Russian sources said earlier this year that Putin wants a “written” pledge by major Western powers not to enlarge the US-led NATO alliance eastwards — shorthand for formally ruling out membership to Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova and other former Soviet republics.
Sending Witkoff, who has led negotiations with Ukraine and Russia on a US peace proposal, appeared to be a signal that Washington saw a chance of progress nearly four years after Russia’s 2022 invasion.
Under pressure from Trump to sign a peace deal that initially backed Moscow’s demands, Zelensky accused Russia of dragging out the war through deadly bombings of cities and Ukraine’s power and water supplies.
A ceasefire along the current front lines would be a fair option, he added.

‘CRITICAL MOMENT’
Germany’s Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said it was a “good sign” Trump had sent his envoys while fielding questions in an interview with the ZDF broadcaster on the suitability of Witkoff and Kushner, two businessmen, as negotiators.
“It’s certainly anything but an ideal setup for such negotiations. That much is clear. But as they say, you can only dance with the people on the dance floor,” Pistorius said.
On the issue of Ukraine’s offer to give up its NATO aspirations in exchange for security guarantees, Pistorius said Ukraine had bitter prior experience of relying on security assurances. Kyiv had in 1994 agreed to give up its Soviet-era nuclear arsenal in exchange for territorial guarantees from the US, Russia and Britain.
“Therefore, it remains to be seen to what extent this statement Zelensky has now made will actually hold true, and what preconditions must be met,” Pistorius said.
“This concerns territorial issues, commitments from Russia and others,” he said, adding mere security guarantees, especially without significant US involvement, “wouldn’t be worth much.”
Britain, France and Germany have been working to refine the US proposals, which in a draft disclosed last month called for Kyiv to cede more territory, abandon its NATO ambitions and accept limits on its armed forces.
European allies have described this as a “critical moment” that could shape Ukraine’s future, and sought to shore up Kyiv’s finances by leveraging frozen Russian central bank assets to fund Kyiv’s military and civilian budget.