Pakistan court orders KP speaker to swear in new chief minister if governor fails

Newly-elected Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Sohail Afridi, speaks during a KP assembly session in Peshawar, Pakistan, on October 13, 2025. (KP government/File)
Short Url
Updated 14 October 2025
Follow

Pakistan court orders KP speaker to swear in new chief minister if governor fails

  • Court gives Governor Kundi until 4 p.m. Wednesday to administer oath to CM-elect Sohail Afridi
  • Afridi’s election took place amid uncertainty after Kundi’s refusal to accept ex-CM’s resignation

ISLAMABAD: A Pakistani high court on Tuesday directed Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) Assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati to administer the oath of office to Chief Minister-elect Sohail Khan Afridi if Governor Faisal Karim Kundi fails to do so by 4 p.m. on Oct. 15.

The development comes after incarcerated former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party petitioned the Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday to nominate Swati or another person to administer the oath after Afridi secured a majority in the provincial assembly.

Afridi’s election took place amid uncertainty triggered by Kundi’s refusal to accept outgoing Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur’s resignation, which was submitted twice — on Oct. 8 and Oct. 11 — over discrepancies in his signatures.

However, the governor’s refusal to accept Gandapur’s resignation was widely viewed as political rather than procedural, aimed at stalling PTI’s smooth transition of power in the province. Kundi belongs to the Pakistan Peoples Party, which is part of the ruling coalition at the federal level, while PTI is the main opposition force at the center, with a great deal of bitterness between the two sides.

A single-judge bench headed by PHC Chief Justice S.M. Attique Shah issued the verdict on the matter after hearing the case on Tuesday.

“[I]n the event of failure of the worthy governor to administer the oath of office ... by 4 p.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2025, then, in exercise of the authority conferred in terms of Article 255(2) of the Constitution ... I, S.M. Attique Shah, CJ PHC, hereby nominate Babar Saleem Swati ... to administer the oath of office to the newly elected CM,” the chief justice said in his nine-page order.

Article 255(2) of Pakistan’s Constitution states that if a specific person is unable to administer the oath, it may be administered by another person duly nominated.

“Certainly, upon his failure to administer the oath to the newly elected chief minister within a reasonable time, it would be construed that such circumstances have arisen as to render the administering of oath to the newly elected chief minister impracticable in terms of Article 255(2) of the Constitution,” the order said.

“This forum further trusts that no impediment shall be caused in the administration of the oath, and that the process will be completed without any further delay,” it added.

Afridi was elected chief minister after Khan directed Gandapur to step down amid concerns over governance and the deteriorating security situation in KP, the province bordering Afghanistan that has faced frequent militant attacks by the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) and other groups in recent months.

Gandapur, who assumed office last year following the PTI party’s victory in the provincial elections, was regarded as one of Khan’s most loyal aides.

Afridi, a legislator from the Bara district, is expected to face major challenges, including rebuilding provincial finances and tackling cross-border militancy.


Imran Khan not a ‘national security threat,’ ex-PM’s party responds to Pakistan military

Updated 06 December 2025
Follow

Imran Khan not a ‘national security threat,’ ex-PM’s party responds to Pakistan military

  • Pakistan’s military spokesperson on Friday described Khan’s anti-army narrative as a “national security threat”
  • PTI Chairman Gohar Ali Khan says words used by military spokesperson for Khan were “not appropriate”

ISLAMABAD: Former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party on Saturday responded to allegations by Pakistan military spokesperson Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry from a day earlier, saying that he was not a “national security threat.”

Chaudhry, who heads the military’s media wing as director general of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), spoke to journalists on Friday, in which he referred to Khan as a “mentally ill” person several times during the press interaction. Chaudhry described Khan’s anti-army narrative as a “national security threat.”

The military spokesperson was responding to Khan’s social media post this week in which he accused Chief of Defense Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir of being responsible for “the complete collapse of the constitution and rule of law in Pakistan.” 

“The people of Pakistan stand with Imran Khan, they stand with PTI,” the party’s secretary-general, Salman Akram Raja, told reporters during a news conference. 

“Imran Khan is not a national security threat. Imran Khan has kept the people of this country united.”

Raja said there were several narratives in the country, including those that created tensions along ethnic and sectarian lines, but Khan had rejected all of them and stood with one that the people of Pakistan supported. 

PTI Chairman Gohar Ali Khan, flanked by Raja, criticized the military spokesperson as well, saying his press talk on Thursday had “severely disappointed” him. 

“The words that were used [by the military spokesperson] were not appropriate,” Gohar said. “Those words were wrong.”

NATURAL OUTCOME’

Speaking to reporters earlier on Saturday, Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif defended the military spokesperson’s remarks against Khan.

“When this kind of language is used for individuals as well as for institutions, then a reaction is a natural outcome,” he said. 

“The same thing is happening on the Twitter accounts being run in his [Khan’s] name. If the DG ISPR has given any reaction to it, then I believe it was a very measured reaction.”

Khan, who was ousted after a parliamentary vote of confidence in April 2022, blames the country’s powerful military for removing him from power by colluding with his political opponents. Both deny the allegations. 

The former prime minister, who has been in prison since August 2023 on a slew of charges he says are politically motivated, also alleges his party was denied victory by the army and his political rivals in the 2024 general election through rigging. 

The army and the government both deny his allegations.