Rights groups call on Microsoft to ‘avoid contributing to human rights abuses’

Short Url
Updated 11 October 2025
Follow

Rights groups call on Microsoft to ‘avoid contributing to human rights abuses’

  • Appeal follows revelations that cloud infrastructure used by Israeli intelligence 

LONDON: Microsoft must suspend business activities that are contributing to grave human rights violations and international crimes by the Israeli military and government authorities, leading human rights organizations said in a joint statement published on Friday.

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Access Now, and several other rights groups jointly urged the US tech giant to “avoid complicity” in what they described as Israel’s ongoing atrocities against Palestinians. The appeal followed revelations that Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure was being used by Israeli intelligence for surveillance and targeting operations in Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

An investigation in August by The Guardian, +972 Magazine, and Local Call reported that Israel’s elite military intelligence unit, Unit 8200, was using Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform to process vast troves of intercepted Palestinian communications.

Following the report, Microsoft announced on Sept. 25 that it had disabled specific subscriptions and services linked to the Israeli military, including access to certain cloud storage and artificial intelligence tools, pending a review of the allegations.

“Microsoft has taken an important first step toward restricting the use of specific technologies by a unit within the Israeli military for repressing Palestinians,” said Deborah Brown, deputy director for technology and rights at Human Rights Watch. “It should comprehensively review its business relationships with Israeli authorities and take action to ensure its infrastructure and tools are not complicit in Israel’s extermination of Palestinians and other serious abuses.”

The company said it will formally respond to the joint letter by the end of October after completing its internal investigation and recommendations.

Human Rights Watch noted that Microsoft should already have conducted “heightened human rights due diligence” given Israel’s long-standing occupation and documented abuses against Palestinians. Reports by the UN, global media, and human rights groups have repeatedly warned of the risks posed by technology companies working with Israeli authorities.

The organizations said that data-driven systems and AI tools used by Israeli forces, including for surveillance and targeting in Gaza, raised serious concerns under international humanitarian law — particularly regarding the distinction between combatants and civilians.

The rights groups cited findings that Israeli authorities had carried out crimes against humanity — including extermination, apartheid, and persecution — as well as acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing. They accused Israel of violating binding orders by the International Court of Justice.

The media investigation found that Israel’s surveillance program, powered by Azure, stores millions of recorded mobile calls. Sources from Unit 8200 said the data had been used to identify bombing targets in Gaza and to “blackmail, detain, or justify the killing” of Palestinians in the West Bank. Microsoft’s own preliminary review reportedly “found evidence supporting elements of The Guardian’s reporting.”

Israel’s assault on Gaza has resulted in the deaths of more than 67,000 Palestinians, including at least 20,000 children, according to figures cited by Human Rights Watch. The bombardment has destroyed most of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure, including homes, schools, and hospitals.

Rights organizations say Israel’s extensive surveillance of Palestinians — enabled by advanced technologies — has been instrumental in the systematic oppression of the population and in the commission of war crimes.

Under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which Microsoft publicly endorses, companies must avoid causing or contributing to abuses and mitigate risks directly linked to their operations or partnerships.

“There is no time to delay,” Brown said. “Microsoft should take decisive action to ensure it is not profiting from grave human rights abuses of Palestinians.”


Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit

Updated 11 November 2025
Follow

Trump threatens $1 billion action as BBC apologises for speech edit

  • Trump’s lawyers say broadcaster must retract documentary or face action
  • BBC apologizes for ‘error of judgment,’ chair Shah rejects institutional bias

LONDON: US President Donald Trump has threatened the BBC with a billion-dollar lawsuit, US sources said, as the broadcaster apologized Monday for editing a speech that gave the impression he urged “violent action” just before the 2021 assault on the US Capitol.
Trump could seek $1 billion in damages from the BBC, a source close to his legal team said, amid a growing furor that prompted the resignations Sunday of two of the broadcaster’s top brass.
The source said the British broadcaster has been given until Friday to retract the 2024 documentary and apologize for the documentary broadcast just before the 2024 US presidential election.
Trump has been accused of launching lawsuits to stifle US media. But the latest controversy has reignited a debate over the British broadcaster, cherished by many but which has faced long-standing accusations of bias, from both ends of the political spectrum.
A spokesman for Trump’s private legal team confirmed that a letter had been sent to the BBC but did not give details.
“The BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally and deceitfully editing its documentary in order to try and interfere in the presidential election,” the spokesman said in a statement to AFP.
“President Trump will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in lies, deception, and fake news.”
A BBC spokesperson said: “We will review the letter and respond directly in due course.”

‘Vital role’ 

In a letter sent to MPs, BBC chairman Samir Shah said the broadcaster accepted that the editing of Trump’s speech for the documentary “did give the impression of a direct call for violent action.”
“The BBC would like to apologize for that error of judgment,” he added, vowing to reform oversight within the broadcaster.
Director general Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness stepped down over the escalating backlash on Sunday.
Trump promptly celebrated, accusing BBC journalists of being “corrupt” and “dishonest.” His press secretary called the broadcaster “100-percent fake news.”
However, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s spokesman told reporters the organization “has a vital role in an age of disinformation.”
“It’s important that the BBC acts swiftly to maintain trust and correct mistakes quickly when they occur,” he added.
The government is preparing a review of the BBC’s charter, which outlines the corporation’s governance and funding framework. The current charter ends in 2027.
The broadcaster, which has cut hundreds of jobs amid stretched finances, is funded by a license fee paid by anyone who watches live TV in Britain.
Some have welcomed the resignations as a timely reckoning for the BBC, while others fear the influence of right-wing detractors, including in the United States.
Ed Davey, leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, urged Starmer to tell Trump to “keep his hands off” the BBC.
Former BBC journalist Karen Fowler-Watt, head of the journalism department at City St. George’s University in London, told AFP the institution was “now really in a situation of crisis.”
She noted it was “very difficult not to see this as a right-wing attack, given the media ecosystem in which we all now live.”

Controversies

In London, Britons were both critical and sympathetic.
Jimmy, who works in construction and declined to give his surname, told AFP the BBC’s reputation had been “tarnished” and it had “shown that they’re not impartial.”
But 78-year-old writer Jennifer Kavanagh said it has “always been attacked from the right and from the left.”
“They can never get it right,” she added.
Its latest crisis intensified after the right-wing Daily Telegraph newspaper reported last week that a former external standards adviser’s warnings of serious and widespread failings of impartiality and systemic bias had been ignored.
That included the editing of sections of Trump’s January 6, 2021, speech ahead of the mob attack on the US Capitol following the 2020 US presidential election.
It appeared he had told supporters he was going to walk there with them and “fight like hell,” whereas the president also told the audience in the intervening period “we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.”
Earlier this year, the BBC apologized for “serious flaws” in the making of another documentary, about the Gaza war, which the UK’s media watchdog deemed “materially misleading.”
It also faced criticism for failing to pull a livestream of punk-rap duo Bob Vylan during this year’s Glastonbury festival after its frontman made anti-Israel comments.