Army says 11 soldiers, including two officers, killed in major gunbattle in northwest Pakistan

Security officials examine damaged vehicles at the site of a powerful car bombing, in Quetta, Pakistan, on September 30, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 08 October 2025
Follow

Army says 11 soldiers, including two officers, killed in major gunbattle in northwest Pakistan

  • Overnight intelligence raid in Orakzai also killed 19 militants linked to Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan
  • Pakistan blames India and Afghan-based militants as violence surges across its western provinces

ISLAMABAD: Nineteen militants and eleven security personnel, including a lieutenant colonel and a major, were killed in an overnight gunbattle in Pakistan’s northwestern Orakzai district, the military’s media wing said on Wednesday, in one of the deadliest clashes of this year.

Pakistan has witnessed a surge in militant violence in recent years, with proscribed groups such as the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the separatist Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) targeting security forces and civilians in the western provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, which border Afghanistan.

According to the Islamabad-based Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS), militant attacks rose sharply in the past three months, resulting in a 46-percent increase in fatalities — including civilians, soldiers and insurgents — compared to the previous quarter.

The think tank said the year 2025 is on track to become deadlier than 2024, already the most violent year in a decade.

“On night 7/8 October 2025, Security Forces conducted an intelligence-based operation in Orakzai District on reported presence of Khwarij belonging to Indian Proxy, Fitna al Khwarij,” the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said. “During the conduct of operation, nineteen Indian-sponsored khwarij were sent to hell due to effective engagement by own troops.”

“However, during the intense fire exchange, Lt. Col. Junaid Arif (age 39, resident of Rawalpindi), leading his troops from the front, along with second-in-command Major Tayyab Rahat (age 33, Rawalpindi), having fought gallantly, paid the ultimate sacrifice and embraced shahadat [martyrdom] along with his nine men,” it added.

Pakistan refers to the TTP, an umbrella network of various armed groups, as “khawarij,” a term rooted in early Islamic history and used to describe an extremist sect that rebelled against legitimate authority and declared other Muslims to be apostates.

The army said a “sanitization operation” was underway to clear the area and eliminate any remaining fighters.

Orakzai is part of Pakistan’s northwestern tribal districts, which turned into militant hotspots after the US invasion of Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks.

Pakistan launched multiple military operations to dismantle insurgent networks there, but the threat has persisted even after the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021.

Islamabad has repeatedly accused India of backing insurgent proxies and Afghanistan of allowing militants to use its territory for attacks inside Pakistan. Kabul and New Delhi have both denied the allegations, though the United Nations has warned of a continued risk of cross-border violence emanating from Afghanistan.


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.