Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists

Palestinian journalists lift placards during rally in protest of the killing of fellow reporters Hussam Shabat and Muhammad Mansour in Israeli strikes at the al-Ahli Arab hospital in Gaza City on March 25, 2025. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 September 2025
Follow

Media giants release film urging Israel to grant Gaza access to foreign journalists

  • The short film from the BBC, AFP, Reuters and AP times to coincide with the UN General Assembly taking place in New York

LONDON: Four major international news agencies have released a film that urges Israel to allow foreign journalists into Gaza.

The short film from the BBC, AFP, Reuters and AP, times to coincide with the UN General Assembly taking place in New York, features historic journalistic footage from conflicts such as World War II, Vietnam, Tiananmen Square, the Rwandan genocide, the Syrian refugee crisis and the war in Ukraine.

“History is told by those who report it,” it begins, narrated by BBC journalist David Dimbleby.

“The report of a child’s body washed up on a beach revealed the stark reality of the Syrian refugee crisis; in Ukraine, journalists from around the world risk their lives every day to report the suffering of the people,” he said, over a slideshow of wartime images.

“But when it comes to Gaza, the job of reporting falls solely to Palestinian journalists who are paying a terrible cost, leaving fewer to bear witness.”

 

 

The BBC said in a statement on Thursday that the film aims “to highlight the importance of independent journalism throughout key moments in recent history.”

Deborah Turness, CEO of BBC News, said: “As journalists, we record the first draft of history. But in this conflict, reporting is falling solely to a small number of Palestinian journalists, who are paying a terrible cost.”

Foreign journalists have been barred from entering the enclave since the onset of Israel’s war in Gaza, which followed the attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023. Only a select few have been escorted in under tight military control, sparking accusations of censorship and a lack of transparency.

Israel has cited security concerns for the restrictions. In a statement last year, the Israel Defense Forces claimed journalists were accompanied “to ensure safety” in battlefield areas.

Media watchdogs and human rights groups have described the Gaza conflict as the deadliest for journalists.

According to the UN Human Rights Office, at least 248 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza since the war began. The Israeli government denies they are deliberately targeted.

“We must now be let into Gaza. To work alongside local journalists, so we can all bring the facts to the world,” Turness said.

The new film premiered in New York on Wednesday night during an event hosted by the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Israel is facing mounting international pressure to end the war on Gaza after a wave of Western countries formally recognized the State of Palestine this week amid renewed backing for a two-state solution to the decades-long conflict.

The war has killed more than 65,000 people in Gaza, according to local authorities, and triggered a catastrophic humanitarian crisis marked by famine and widespread displacement.

In response to the diplomatic shift, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state and threatened to annex parts of the occupied West Bank, defying growing global calls for a negotiated solution.

In previous months, the four media outlets had issued joint statements expressing concern over the humanitarian conditions faced by journalists in Gaza, including hunger, displacement and the risk of death.

In August, 27 countries, including the UK, issued a joint statement urging Israel to allow immediate foreign media access to Gaza and condemning attacks on journalists.


BBC ‘determined to fight’ Trump defamation claim

Updated 17 November 2025
Follow

BBC ‘determined to fight’ Trump defamation claim

  • Corporation chair Samir Shah says he sees no basis for Trump’s defamation claim, apologized for editing of Trump’s speech
  • Trump’s lawyers said would file case in the US where the US president is expected to face tougher legal standard given the protection of freedom of speech in the constitution

LONDON: The BBC is determined to fight any legal action filed by US President Donald Trump and sees no basis for a defamation case over its editing of one of his speeches, its chair said on Monday.
Trump said on Friday he was likely to sue the British broadcaster this week for up to $5 billion after it spliced together separate excerpts of a speech on January 6, 2021, when his supporters stormed the Capitol. The edit created the impression he had called for violence.
BBC chair Samir Shah sent a letter to Trump to apologize for the edit, the BBC said on Thursday, but it said it strongly disagreed there was a basis for a defamation claim.

SHAH SAYS BBC POSITION HAS NOT CHANGED
Trump told reporters on Friday he would sue for anywhere between $1 billion and $5 billion.
Shah told BBC staff in an email on Monday there was speculation about the possibility of legal action, including potential costs or settlements.
“In all this we are, of course, acutely aware of the privilege of our funding and the need to protect our license fee payers, the British public,” Shah wrote.
“I want to be very clear with you — our position has not changed. There is no basis for a defamation case and we are determined to fight this.”
The documentary, made by a third party, aired in Britain before the November 2024 US election. It showed Trump telling supporters “we’re going to walk down to the Capitol” and we “fight like hell,” a comment he made in a different part of his speech. Trump had in fact said supporters would “cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.”
The edit was made public after the Daily Telegraph published a leaked internal BBC report.
The report, written by an independent adviser, contained wider criticism of the BBC’s news output, including assertions of anti-Israel bias at BBC Arabic and a lack of balance in stories about trans issues, and led to the resignation of the director-general Tim Davie and head of news Deborah Turness.

NO US BROADCAST
Trump’s lawyers said the edit caused the president “overwhelming reputational and financial harm,” according to a letter seen by Reuters.
They said they would sue in Florida, rather than in Britain, where the one-year limit to file a defamation case has expired.
Trump will face a tougher legal standard in the United States given the protection of freedom of speech in the constitution, lawyers have said.
The BBC is likely to argue that the program was not broadcast and was not available on its streaming service in the US, so voters in Florida could not have seen it.
The BBC, which is funded by a mandatory levy on TV-watching households, is also widely expected to challenge the reputational harm claim on grounds that Trump went on to win the election, and say the edit was not done in malice.