Foreign disinformation about Charlie Kirk’s killing seeks to widen US divisions

Items are displayed in the makeshift memorial for Charlie Kirk outside the headquarters of Turning Point USA on September 17, 2025, in Phoenix, Arizona. (Getty Images via AFP)
Short Url
Updated 18 September 2025
Follow

Foreign disinformation about Charlie Kirk’s killing seeks to widen US divisions

  • Russian voices have tried to tie Kirk’s death to US support for Ukraine, spreading a conspiracy theory that the Ukrainian government killed Kirk 
  • Pro-Iranian groups took a different tack, claiming Israel was behind Kirk’s death and that the suspect was set up to take the fall
  • Bots linked to Beijing claimed that Kirk’s death shows that the US is violent, polarized and dysfunctional

WASHINGTON: Russia moved to amplify online conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk’s killing just hours after it happened, seeding social media with the frightening claim that America is slipping into civil war.
Chinese and pro-Iranian groups also spread disinformation about the shooting, with those loyal to Iran’s interests backing antisemitic conspiracy theories while bots linked to Beijing claimed that Kirk’s death shows that the United States is violent, polarized and dysfunctional.
America’s adversaries have long used fake social media accounts, online bots and disinformation to depict the US as a dangerous country beset with extremism and gun violence. Kirk’s killing has provided another opportunity for those overseas eager to shape public understanding while inflaming political polarization.
“Charlie Kirk’s Death and the Coming Civil War,” tweeted Russian ultranationalist Alexander Dugin, whose influence earned him the moniker ” Putin’s brain,” referring to Russia’s president.

Pro-Russian bots blamed Democrats and predicted more violence. Russian state media published English-language articles with headlines claiming a conspiracy orchestrated by shadowy forces: “Was Charlie Kirk’s Killer a Pro?”
Foreign disinformation makes up a tiny fraction of the overall online discussion about Kirk’s death, but it could undermine any efforts to heal political divisions or even spur further violence.
“We’ve seen multiple Russian campaigns attempting to exploit” Kirk’s killing, said Joseph Bodnar, senior research manager at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. In many cases, the campaigns aren’t adding new claims but are recycling ones that emerged from American users. “They’re picking up domestic actors and amplifying them.”
Adversaries tailor disinformation
In each case, those spreading the disinformation have tailored it for their own ends. Chinese propaganda has focused on the violent nature of Kirk’s death, painting the US as a nation of violent gun owners and political extremists.
Russian voices have tried to tie Kirk’s death to US support for Ukraine, even spreading a conspiracy theory that the Ukrainian government killed Kirk because of his criticism of that aid.
Pro-Iranian groups took a different tack, claiming Israel was behind Kirk’s death and that the suspect was set up to take the fall. This conspiracy theory caught on with white supremacist groups in the US, showing how corrosive claims can easily spread online despite oceans and linguistic and cultural barriers.
The influence campaigns come as the US has rolled back government efforts to expose foreign disinformation.
On Wednesday the State Department announced it was ending its remaining efforts to counter foreign disinformation, following a decision earlier this year to shutter the Global Engagement Center, an office that had called out Russian, Chinese and Iranian disinformation in the past. Republicans had targeted the center and its mission because of what they said was its censorship of conservative ideas.
False and misleading claims can spread quickly following big news events as people go online to look for information. Artificial intelligence programs that can create lifelike video and audio can make it even harder to find the truth, as can AI chatbots that routinely offer up false information.
It happened again following Kirk’s killing, when misinformation about the shooting and the suspect quickly spread online.
In recent years, groups looking to spread confusion or distrust have seized on hurricanes, wars, the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, the COVID-19 pandemic and other disasters, as well as the attempted assassinations of President Donald Trump.
The details vary, but the conspiracy theories pushed by foreign adversaries all suggest American institutions — the government, the media, law enforcement, health care — are failing and can no longer be trusted, and that more violence is likely.
Calls for social media companies to crack down
Regardless of the source of the information, social media companies should do more to stop both foreign disinformation and domestic calls for violence, said Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which tracks online disinformation.
Posts calling for retaliatory violence following Kirk’s death have been seen 43 million times on X alone, according to the center’s research, though it can’t say which posts came from foreign sources.
Platforms like X “are failing catastrophically to limit the reach of posts that celebrate murder and mayhem,” Ahmed said.
Russia, China and Iran have all denied targeting Americans with disinformation. Officials in China have pushed back on claims that Chinese social media bots are being used to amplify false claims about the Kirk shooting.
“China condemns all unlawful and violent acts. That said, we firmly oppose some US politicians accusing China of ‘instilling disinformation and encouraging violence,’” a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry posted on X.
Russia likewise rejected the accusations of spreading misinformation about Kirk’s death. A.V. Bondarev, a spokesperson for Russia’s embassy in Washington, wrote in an email to The Associated Press that “Russia does not interfere and does not intend to interfere in the internal affairs of other states, including the United States.”
“We consider it unacceptable that this tragedy is being used as a pretext to fuel anti-Russian hysteria,” Bondarev wrote.
For authorities trying to keep the public informed, the false claims about Kirk’s death are a potentially dangerous effort to hijack American discourse.
“There is a tremendous amount of disinformation we are tracking,” Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, a Republican, said at a recent press conference about Kirk’s killing. “What we are seeing is our adversaries want violence. We have bots from Russia, China, all over the world that are trying to instill disinformation and encourage violence.”
Cox urged people to ignore bogus claims that seem designed to elicit fear — and suggested that Americans log off social media and spend time with family instead.
 


‘AI is here, now what?’ Arab News unveils report on future of media ahead of Bridge Summit

Updated 41 min 31 sec ago
Follow

‘AI is here, now what?’ Arab News unveils report on future of media ahead of Bridge Summit

  • As the Bridge Summit opens in Abu Dhabi, Arab News releases a landmark report on how AI is transforming media in the MENA region
  • Based on a high-level roundtable at the Dubai Future Forum, the new report highlights both the opportunities and risks facing Arab media

DUBAI: As the Bridge Summit kicks off in Abu Dhabi on Monday, bringing together global leaders to explore the future of media, entertainment, and the creative economy, Arab News has launched a timely report on how artificial intelligence is transforming the media industry in the Middle East and beyond.

The report, produced by the Arab News Research and Studies Unit following a high-level roundtable at the Dubai Future Forum, captures the urgency and complexity of AI adoption in the media industry of the Middle East and North Africa region.

It explores how AI is transforming newsroom operations, redefining journalistic roles, and raising critical questions around credibility, accuracy, and trust amid rapid technological disruption.

AI is no longer an emerging trend in the Middle East — it is a central force reshaping economies, governance and public communication.

Journalists watch an introductory video by the 'artificial intelligence' anchor Fedha on the twitter account of Kuwait News service, in Kuwait City on April 9, 2023. (AFP file photo)

With AI projected to contribute $320 billion to the regional economy by 2030, including more than $135 billion to Saudi Arabia’s gross domestic product and nearly $96 billion to the UAE’s, governments and industries are racing to integrate it.

But, for the region’s news media, AI represents something deeper than economic potential: a direct challenge to the foundations of credibility, trust and fact-based reporting.

Such were the questions that set the stage for the roundtable hosted and moderated by Arab News’ Deputy Editor-in-Chief Noor Nugali in collaboration with the Dubai Future Foundation, where editors, media executives and tech specialists convened to confront an industry experiencing one of the most dramatic transformations in its history.

Arab News held a roundtable on the sidelines of the Dubai Future Forum. (AN photo)

The result is an exhaustive and insightful report, which offers both optimism and unease as AI’s looming presence weaves into daily newsroom operations, just as the guardrails needed to protect journalism from misinformation, bias and opacity remain dangerously underdeveloped.

“AI is here and it’s transforming our newsroom,” said Mina Al-Oraibi, editor in chief of the UAE’s leading daily The National, as she described how her team recently held a full-newsroom AI workshop to generate internal use cases.

“We got 26 ideas that we’re working through so people don’t feel this is something imposed,” she said. “They need to feel they’re ahead of the curve rather than being eaten up by it.”

Across the region, that curve is moving quickly. Globally, 81 percent of journalists now use AI tools during their general work, while nearly half do so daily.

However, reporters admit they rely on it mostly to handle mundane, time-consuming tasks such as transcribing interviews, summarizing reports, and translating documents.

Nabeel Al-Khatib, general manager of Asharq News, explained how the shift has already redefined newsroom economics.

“A newsroom of 50 can now publish the equivalent of what 500 once could,” he said. However, although “machines will take over the production line,” he argued that “human oversight must remain to ensure accuracy, context and editorial standards.”

For many newsrooms, the advent of generative AI — machines creating new original content — has created valuable efficiencies, freeing journalists to spend more time verifying and reporting, which are tasks no machine can yet replace.

US President Donald Trump is shown praying in this AI-generated image. Media experts worry that differentiating between true and fake pictures is becoming difficult. 

However, several speakers stressed that the value of AI depends entirely on how intentionally it is used.

“We believe it’s human first, human last,” said Nayla Tueni, editor in chief of Lebanese daily An-Nahar. “We need to always fact-check everything. But at the same time, we need to use all the tools.”

For Tueni, transformation is not optional. “I don’t think journalism will end,” she said. However, if outlets “don’t transform, they cannot continue because the world is transforming every second.”

Accessing revenue streams is also a concern. Elda Choucair, CEO of Omnicom Media Group MENA, said “the biggest danger is … if you don’t have content that you advertise around.”

The region’s audiences appear more comfortable with AI-enhanced content than those in Western markets. But even as opportunities expand, risks multiply. AI-generated misinformation has surged so dramatically that the World Economic Forum ranked it the top global short-term threat for the second year in a row.

A BBC-led audit of four major AI systems found that nearly half of AI-generated answers contained significant errors, fabricated details or incorrect sourcing.

This AI-generated image shows US President Donald Trump being arrested by the police. Media experts worry that differentiating between true and fake pictures is becoming difficult. 

“It’s already very difficult to differentiate between the (true) and the fake,” said Choucair. “We need to create awareness that sometimes, if you really want the truth, you’ve got to wait.”

At a time when 70 percent of global audiences say they struggle to trust online content, speakers warned that the misuse or undisclosed use of AI could deepen a crisis of confidence.

“The machine should be a slave to human beings,” advertising media mogul Pierre Choueiri said, adding: “This is where governments, or regulations, should come in.”

However, regulation in the region remains elusive. While Saudi Arabia has taken major steps, including the establishment of the Saudi Data & AI Authority and the Kingdom’s Generative AI Guidelines, efforts remain far from the comprehensive frameworks seen in Europe.

“It’s inconceivable that Arab consumers are left to face significant risks with no regulatory shield,” said media strategist and legal expert Mazen Hayek. He argued that the region needs its own protections, like the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, to ensure transparency, safeguard data and hold AI providers accountable.

For Hayek and others, the deeper problem involves technological sovereignty. Nearly all of the AI platforms used in the Middle East today — from search engines to large language models — are built and controlled abroad, often trained on datasets that do not reflect the region’s linguistic, cultural or political realities.

“We live in a region that has zero control over the platforms and the technology that we consume,” Hayek said. “Someone needs to create a platform that empowers the region to create and distribute its own content.”

Julien Hawari, CEO of the emerging social media platform Million, said the main issue is integrity. “That has been a problem for as long as we can think of.”

Rashid Al-Marri, CEO of the Media Regulation Sector at the Dubai Media Council, explained that “there has to be that human element understanding (the content) and what’s happening and being able to come out and speak and get the truth out there.”

Saudi Arabia’s push toward sovereign AI infrastructure, including Public Investment Fund-backed HUMAIN and the $100 billion Project Transcendence, was cited as a step in the right direction. However, roundtable participants warned that unless the region accelerates these efforts, it risks ceding its information future to external algorithms and foreign companies.

The human-capital gap is equally pressing. Despite widespread adoption, most journalists using AI have received little or no training. Many rely on self-learning or online tutorials, and nearly eight in 10 work in newsrooms without formal AI policies.

This lack of structure has created an environment where AI is widely deployed but rarely governed.

For CAMB.AI co-founder Avneesh Prakash, the solution requires both precaution and empowerment. “Like any innovation, AI needs to be regulated,” he said. “Just as a car has an accelerator and a brake, AI must include a kill switch because it requires human judgment, human creativity and human resilience.”

Despite the risks, the discussion ended on a note of guarded optimism. Participants agreed that AI can help rebuild journalism for a digital era — but only if newsrooms combine innovation with rigorous editorial oversight, transparency and a renewed commitment to verification.

Mamoon Sbeih, regional president of advertising firm APCO, offered a clear warning of what lies ahead. AI, he said, “might help the journalism industry progress and redefine itself, or it might expedite its demise.”

For now, the region’s media leaders remain determined to pursue the first path — ensuring that even as machines play a growing role in production, the values that define journalism remain firmly, unmistakably human.