New strain in ties as Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of aiding militants, experts warn

An Afghan security personnel member stands guard at a fenced corridor of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak district, Kandahar province. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 14 September 2025
Follow

New strain in ties as Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of aiding militants, experts warn

  • 19 soldiers killed in clashes with militants in Pakistan’s northwest
  • Pakistani PM Shehbaz Sharif says ‘terrorists come from Afghanistan’

KABUL: The Pakistani prime minister’s accusations of Afghan involvement in cross-border attacks are likely to further strain relations between the two neighbors, experts say, after 19 soldiers were killed in clashes in Pakistan’s northwest this week.

Over the past few days, Pakistani security forces have reported several raids in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province on what it said were hideouts of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan — an outlawed armed group, which is separate from the Afghan Taliban.

After the military said on Saturday the clashes with the militants killed at least 19 soldiers and 45 fighters, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif told reporters in Bannu, one of the districts where the attacks took place, that “terrorists come from Afghanistan” and that Pakistan “will have nothing to do” with the Afghan administration if it chooses to support them.

While there has been no immediate reaction from Kabul to the Pakistani prime minister’s statements, they marked “an escalation in hostile rhetoric toward Afghanistan,” Ahmed-Waleed Kakar, analyst and founder of the Afghan Eye podcast, told Arab News.

Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 2021, Pakistan has been accusing them of allowing TTP militants to use Afghan territory for cross-border attacks — a claim the Taliban have repeatedly denied.

“Kabul has routinely dismissed the allegations against it as being Islamabad’s attempts at distracting from its own ‘internal problems,’” Kakar said.

Similar allegations were made even before the Taliban took over the country following the collapse of its Western-backed government of Ashraf Ghani.

“The same accusation was used in part to justify building a towering security fence along a historically porous frontier that, according to Pakistan’s own and contemporary statements, has abjectly failed to provide the security it was touted to,” Kakar said.

“(That) development illustrates how closely intertwined Pakistan’s historically tense relationship with Afghanistan is with its own precarious and increasingly fragile domestic stability.”

When the Pakistani prime minister made similar accusations against Afghanistan in April, Hamdullah Fitrat, Taliban deputy spokesman, said Kabul should not be held responsible for Islamabad’s “failed policies” and that it did not permit any group to use Afghan soil for “any activity or operation against Pakistan.”

Afghan-Pakistani relations reached a new low after a wave of deadly suicide bombings in Pakistan two years ago. Islamabad blamed them on TTP and, as violence mounted, started deporting undocumented foreigners, mostly Afghans, saying that the high number of refugees posed risks to national security.

Over the past two years, 1.4 million Afghan nationals have been expelled, deepening a humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan, which is struggling to accommodate the sudden influx of people.

“Islamabad is trying to justify the mass deportations by alleging refugee involvement in destabilizing activities — a claim that lacks sufficient substantiation,” said Naseer Ahmad Nawidy, political science professor at Salam University in Kabul.

“Further escalation of tensions serves no purpose. Both nations require economic development, regional connectivity, and constructive relations with the international community. Ongoing hostility only harms the broader region.”


Palestine activists on hunger strike in UK prisons ‘face death’ if government fails to act

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Palestine activists on hunger strike in UK prisons ‘face death’ if government fails to act

  • One activist, who has refused food since Nov. 2, was rushed to hospital after collapsing
  • None of the 8 Palestine Action members have been convicted of a crime

LONDON: Eight Palestine Action activists on hunger strike in the UK face dying in prison if Justice Secretary David Lammy fails to intervene, lawyers representing the group have warned.

Two of the activists on Wednesday reached the 46-day mark of their protest. A third is on 45 days.

It was at 46 days that Martin Hurson, 24, became the sixth of 10 prominent Irish Republican Army hunger strikers to die in 1981.

Lawyers for the activists on Tuesday sent a letter to Lammy, also the UK’s deputy prime minister, The Times reported.

He was warned that without intervention, the deaths of the eight activists is “increasingly more than a mere possibility. It is a likelihood.”

None of the activists have been convicted of a crime, and are serving lengthy periods on remand for two alleged break-ins in protest against Israeli arms companies and military sites with ties to the country.

One of the group, Qesser Zuhrah, 20, has refused food since Nov. 2. She collapsed several nights ago in prison as her legs shook uncontrollably, her lawyers said.

Zuhrah was left on the floor for hours “coming in and out of consciousness” before she was rushed to hospital, they added.

In the days before her collapse, she found it difficult to walk and suffered sharp pain in her neck, shoulders and lower abdominal region, they said.

A protest demanding an ambulance for Zuhrah was held on Tuesday night and attended by Your Party MP Zarah Sultana. The rally outside the prison descended into violence, with police arresting three protesters.

Another Palestine Action protester on hunger strike, Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 30, is suffering cognitive decline and has low red and white blood cell counts, test results quoted by her lawyers show.

One of the eight protesters who has since ended his involvement has muscular dystrophy. Another, a diabetic, is at the 13-day mark of the hunger strike.

The lawyers representing the group, from Imran Khan & Partners, said it is the “biggest coordinated prison hunger strike” in the UK since 1981. That year, 10 prisoners in Northern Ireland died after taking part in an IRA hunger strike.

The legal firm said: “All have lost a significant percentage of their body weight, and, with the hunger strike in its second month, are reaching a critical stage and nearing the point of no return.”

Despite mounting pressure from MPs, Lammy has refused to meet the activists’ lawyers.

A group of 58 MPs have signed an early day motion expressing “extreme concern” over the status of the activists.

Their families are set to hold a press conference on Thursday.

Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons speaker, said last week that Lammy’s refusal to meet MP John McDonnell over the issue was “totally unacceptable.”

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in Parliament this week that “there are rules and procedures in place in relation to hunger strikes, and we’re following those rules and procedures.”

The Ministry of Justice said: “We continually assess prisoners’ wellbeing and will always take the appropriate action, including taking prisoners to hospital if they are assessed as needing treatment by a medical professional.”

The alleged crimes of the eight activists took place before Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organization by the government in July.

The group are demanding immediate bail, a reversal of Palestine Action’s proscription and an end to restrictions on their communications in prison.

Imran Khan & Partners’ letter to Lammy, seen by The Times, said: “You are uniquely placed in that as a senior government minister with oversight of His Majesty’s prison service, you can bring about a resolution of the situation, such that the increasing deterioration of our clients’ health does not lead to their death.

“We are at a loss why you would not want to do this. We make clear that our request for a meeting is in an effort to seek to resolve the immediate situation and prevent the loss of life. Unless you tell us, we cannot see any reason why you would not want to engage in this process.”