New strain in ties as Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of aiding militants, experts warn

An Afghan security personnel member stands guard at a fenced corridor of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak district, Kandahar province. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 14 September 2025
Follow

New strain in ties as Pakistan accuses Afghanistan of aiding militants, experts warn

  • 19 soldiers killed in clashes with militants in Pakistan’s northwest
  • Pakistani PM Shehbaz Sharif says ‘terrorists come from Afghanistan’

KABUL: The Pakistani prime minister’s accusations of Afghan involvement in cross-border attacks are likely to further strain relations between the two neighbors, experts say, after 19 soldiers were killed in clashes in Pakistan’s northwest this week.

Over the past few days, Pakistani security forces have reported several raids in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province on what it said were hideouts of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan — an outlawed armed group, which is separate from the Afghan Taliban.

After the military said on Saturday the clashes with the militants killed at least 19 soldiers and 45 fighters, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif told reporters in Bannu, one of the districts where the attacks took place, that “terrorists come from Afghanistan” and that Pakistan “will have nothing to do” with the Afghan administration if it chooses to support them.

While there has been no immediate reaction from Kabul to the Pakistani prime minister’s statements, they marked “an escalation in hostile rhetoric toward Afghanistan,” Ahmed-Waleed Kakar, analyst and founder of the Afghan Eye podcast, told Arab News.

Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in 2021, Pakistan has been accusing them of allowing TTP militants to use Afghan territory for cross-border attacks — a claim the Taliban have repeatedly denied.

“Kabul has routinely dismissed the allegations against it as being Islamabad’s attempts at distracting from its own ‘internal problems,’” Kakar said.

Similar allegations were made even before the Taliban took over the country following the collapse of its Western-backed government of Ashraf Ghani.

“The same accusation was used in part to justify building a towering security fence along a historically porous frontier that, according to Pakistan’s own and contemporary statements, has abjectly failed to provide the security it was touted to,” Kakar said.

“(That) development illustrates how closely intertwined Pakistan’s historically tense relationship with Afghanistan is with its own precarious and increasingly fragile domestic stability.”

When the Pakistani prime minister made similar accusations against Afghanistan in April, Hamdullah Fitrat, Taliban deputy spokesman, said Kabul should not be held responsible for Islamabad’s “failed policies” and that it did not permit any group to use Afghan soil for “any activity or operation against Pakistan.”

Afghan-Pakistani relations reached a new low after a wave of deadly suicide bombings in Pakistan two years ago. Islamabad blamed them on TTP and, as violence mounted, started deporting undocumented foreigners, mostly Afghans, saying that the high number of refugees posed risks to national security.

Over the past two years, 1.4 million Afghan nationals have been expelled, deepening a humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan, which is struggling to accommodate the sudden influx of people.

“Islamabad is trying to justify the mass deportations by alleging refugee involvement in destabilizing activities — a claim that lacks sufficient substantiation,” said Naseer Ahmad Nawidy, political science professor at Salam University in Kabul.

“Further escalation of tensions serves no purpose. Both nations require economic development, regional connectivity, and constructive relations with the international community. Ongoing hostility only harms the broader region.”


US judge rejects Trump administration’s halt of wind energy permits

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

US judge rejects Trump administration’s halt of wind energy permits

  • 17 Democratic-led states challenged the suspension
  • Offshore wind group supports ruling for economic and energy priorities
BOSTON: A federal judge on Monday struck down an order by US President Donald Trump’s administration to halt all federal approvals for new wind energy projects, saying that agencies’ efforts to implement his directive were unlawful and arbitrary.
Agencies including the US Departments of the Interior and Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency have been implementing a directive to halt all new approvals needed for both onshore and offshore wind projects pending a review of leasing and permitting practices.
Siding with a group of 17 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, US District Judge Patti Saris in Boston said those agencies had failed to provide reasoned explanations for the actions they took to carry out the directive Trump issued on his first day back in office on January 20.
They could not lawfully under the Administrative Procedure Act indefinitely decline to review applications for permits, added Saris, who was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat whose state led the legal challenge, called the ruling “a big victory in our fight to keep tackling the climate crisis” in a social media post.
White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement that Trump through his order had “unleashed America’s energy dominance to protect our economic and national security.”
Trump has sought to boost government support for fossil fuels and maximize output in the United States, the world’s top oil and gas producer, after campaigning for the presidency on the refrain of “drill, baby, drill.”
The states, led by New York, sued in May, after the Interior Department ordered Norway’s Equinor to halt construction on its Empire Wind offshore wind project off the coast of New York.
While the administration allowed work on Empire Wind to resume, the states say the broader pause on permitting and leasing continues to have harmful economic effects.
The states said the agencies implementing Trump’s order never said why they were abruptly changing longstanding policy supporting wind energy development.
Saris agreed, saying the policy “constitutes a change of course from decades of agencies issuing (or denying) permits related to wind energy projects.”
The defendants “candidly concede that the sole factor they considered in deciding to stop issuing permits was the President’s direction to do so,” Saris wrote.
An offshore wind energy trade group welcomed the ruling.
“Overturning the unlawful blanket halt to offshore wind permitting activities is needed to achieve our nation’s energy and economic priorities of bringing more power online quickly, improving grid reliability, and driving billions of new American steel manufacturing and shipbuilding investments,” Oceantic Network CEO Liz Burdock said in a statement.