US, Saudi, UAE, Egypt call for Sudan truce, transition to civilian rule

Sudanese villagers are seen at a displacement camp in Al Dabba, Sudan, on September 6, 2025, as the humanitarian situation deteriorates amid the ongoing conflict between the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese army. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 13 September 2025
Follow

US, Saudi, UAE, Egypt call for Sudan truce, transition to civilian rule

  • Transition should “meet the aspirations of the Sudanese people toward smoothly establishing an independent, civilian-led government”, the four countries said in a statement
  • Since April 2023, Sudan has been torn apart by war between its army — which maintains control over most state institutions — and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces 

WASHINGTON : The United States, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt called on Friday for a three-month humanitarian truce in Sudan, to be followed by a permanent ceasefire and a nine-month transition toward civilian rule.
In a joint statement issued by the US State Department, the four countries said the transition should “meet the aspirations of the Sudanese people toward smoothly establishing an independent, civilian-led government with broad-based legitimacy and accountability.”
Since April 2023, Sudan has been torn apart by war between its army — which maintains control over most state institutions — and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).
The conflict has killed tens of thousands, displaced millions and created what the United Nations describes as one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.
“Sudan’s future governance is for the Sudanese people to decide through an inclusive and transparent transition process, not controlled by any warring party,” Friday’s statement said.
The statement appeared to have been released in lieu of a meeting involving the foreign ministers of the four countries that had originally been scheduled for July in Washington but was postponed due to disagreements between Egypt and the UAE.
Egypt, a key ally of Sudan’s regular army, has consistently called for the protection of state institutions.
The UAE, meanwhile, has been widely accused — including in UN reports — of supplying arms to the RSF, a claim it denies.




A satellite image shows long-range 'suicide' drones and launching gear north of the airport in Nyala, Sudan, on May 6, 2025. (Maxar Technologies/Handout via REUTERS )

Diplomatic sources told AFP that Cairo objected to earlier language barring both the army and the RSF from taking part in the transition.
The final language appears to reflect a compromise, avoiding specific mention of either side while insisting Sudan’s next government be decided by the people.
It also explicitly excludes the involvement of “violent extremist groups part of or evidently linked to the Muslim Brotherhood” in the transition process.
The United States on Friday imposed sanctions on Sudan’s army-aligned finance minister, Gebreil Ibrahim, a senior Islamist figure, and on the Baraa Ibn-Malik Brigade, an Islamist militia that has been fighting alongside the army.
Islamists dominated Sudanese politics for three decades under ousted president Omar Al-Bashir and have seen a resurgence during the war, aligning with the army.
“These sanctions aim to limit Islamist influence within Sudan and curtail Iran’s regional activities, which have contributed to regional destabilization, conflict, and civilian suffering,” the US Treasury Department said in a statement.
Despite international efforts to push for peace, it remains unclear whether the warring factions are willing to engage.
In June, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a one-week ceasefire in North Darfur’s besieged capital of El-Fasher. The army agreed to the pause, but the RSF rejected it.
Both sides have repeatedly vowed to continue fighting until securing outright military victory.
The army currently controls Sudan’s east, north and center, while the RSF holds parts of the south and nearly all of the western Darfur region — where it recently declared a parallel government, fueling fears of the country’s fragmentation.
Friday’s joint statement, however, maintained “there is no viable military solution to the conflict, and the status quo creates unacceptable suffering and risks to peace and security.”
 


UN peacekeepers say Israeli forces fired on them in southern Lebanon

Updated 11 December 2025
Follow

UN peacekeepers say Israeli forces fired on them in southern Lebanon

  • “Yesterday, peacekeepers in vehicles patrolling the Blue Line were fired upon by IDF soldiers in a Merkava tank,” UNIFIL said
  • It said that both the peacekeepers and the Israeli tank were in Lebanese territory

BEIRUT: The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon said Wednesday that Israeli forces fired on its peacekeepers a day earlier in the country’s south, urging Israel’s army to “cease aggressive behavior.”
It is the latest such incident reported by the peacekeepers in southern Lebanon, where UNIFIL acts as a buffer between Israel and Lebanon and has been working with Lebanon’s army to support a year-old truce between Israel and militant group Hezbollah.
“Yesterday, peacekeepers in vehicles patrolling the Blue Line were fired upon by IDF (Israeli army) soldiers in a Merkava tank,” a UNIFIL statement said, referring to the de facto border.
“One ten-round burst of machine-gun fire was fired above the convoy, and four further ten-round bursts were fired nearby,” the statement said.
It said that both the peacekeepers and the Israeli tank were in Lebanese territory at the time of the incident and that the Israeli military had been informed of the location and timing of the peacekeeping patrol in advance.
“Peacekeepers asked the IDF to stop firing through UNIFIL’s liaison channels... Fortunately, no one was injured,” it said.
Last month UNIFIL said Israeli soldiers shot at its troops in the south, while Israel’s military said it mistook blue helmets for “suspects” and fired warning shots.
In October, UNIFIL said one of its members was wounded by an Israeli grenade dropped near a UN position in the country’s south, the third incident of its kind in just over a month.
“Attacks on or near peacekeepers are serious violations of (UN) Security Council Resolution 1701,” UNIFIL said on Wednesday, referring to the 2006 resolution that formed the basis of the November 2024 truce.
“We call on the IDF to cease aggressive behavior and attacks on or near peacekeepers working to rebuild stability along the Blue Line,” the peacekeepers said.
Israel carries out regular attacks on Lebanon despite the truce, usually saying it is targeting sites and operatives belonging to Hezbollah, which it accuses of rearming.
It has also kept troops in five south Lebanon areas it deems strategic.
On Saturday, a UN Security Council delegation visiting Lebanon urged all parties to uphold the ceasefire.
It emphasized that the “safety of peacekeepers must be respected and that they must never be targeted,” after gunmen on mopeds attacked UNIFIL personnel last week.