Pakistan seeks overland access to Central Asia, Europe in talks with Kazakh deputy PM

Kazakhstan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Murat Nurtleu (center) speaks during a meeting with his Pakistani counterpart at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Islamabad, Pakistan, on September 9, 2025. (MOFA) 
Short Url
Updated 09 September 2025
Follow

Pakistan seeks overland access to Central Asia, Europe in talks with Kazakh deputy PM

  • Both sides reaffirm resolve to deepen relations ahead of Kazakh president’s November visit
  • Pakistan highlights spare port capacity, pitches dedicated Central Asia terminal at Gwadar

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday discussed enhanced economic and regional connectivity with Kazakhstan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Murat Nurtleu, emphasizing the development of air, rail and road links to encourage more trade and people-to-people contacts.

Pakistan was among the first nations to recognize Kazakhstan’s independence in December 1991, with formal diplomatic ties established in February 1992 during President Nursultan Nazarbayev’s visit to Islamabad. Relations between the two countries are rooted in shared Islamic heritage and a growing strategic partnership, with Pakistan offering the landlocked Central Asian republics access to southern seaports for global trade.

Nurtleu arrived in Islamabad on Monday for a two-day visit, accompanied by Kazakhstan’s transport and deputy trade ministers, and held meetings with his counterpart, Senator Ishaq Dar, and Sharif’s other senior cabinet members.

“The Prime Minister expressed Pakistan’s desire to enhance bilateral trade, investment, connectivity (through air, rail and road links), and people-to-people exchanges with Kazakhstan,” said a statement released by his office after the meeting.

Earlier, the visiting Kazakh delegation met Federal Minister for Communications Abdul Aleem Khan, Minister for Food Security Rana Tanveer Hussain and Railways Minister Hanif Abbasi.

“Both countries can benefit from mutual experiences in the communications sector,” Khan said during the interaction.

“Trade corridors and better transport links are our priority,” he added. “Pakistan is keen to gain access to Central Asia and Europe.”

Both sides agreed that they can undertake substantial work in the field of transport and communications. They also hoped the visit to Pakistan would be mutually beneficial for the two countries and brighten prospects for expanding future cooperation between them.

MARITIME PUSH

In a separate engagement, officials from the Ministry of Maritime Affairs briefed the Kazakh delegation on seaport opportunities. They pointed out Kazakhstan could benefit from container handling, logistics, off-dock terminals, free trade zones and other port facilities under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), noting that Pakistan’s tariffs were regionally competitive.

Karachi Port Trust and Port Qasim Authority highlighted spare capacity to handle Central Asian cargo, while stressing that a dedicated multipurpose terminal at Gwadar was crucial for long-term trade growth.

Presentations on business opportunities and incentives at Karachi, Port Qasim and Gwadar were given to the visiting delegation.

Meanwhile, delegation-level talks co-chaired by Dar and Nurtleu were held at the Foreign Office to review the full spectrum of bilateral cooperation, including trade and investment, agriculture, information technology, education, culture, tourism, security and logistics connectivity.

A roadmap for Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s planned visit to Pakistan in November was finalized, and the two sides signed an Action Plan of Cooperation between their foreign ministries.

Pakistan also offered to send a delegation to Astana to finalize various memoranda of understanding and agreements under consideration ahead of Tokayev’s visit.


Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says over 330 Afghan fighters killed in clashes

Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says over 330 Afghan fighters killed in clashes

  • Clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistan’s airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend
  • US voices support for Pakistan, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar says they aim to make Pakistan safe

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until an end to “terrorism” emanating from the Afghan soil, officials said on Friday, following the killing of more than 330 Afghan fighters in cross-border clashes this week.

The latest clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistan’s airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend triggered Afghan retaliatory attacks along the border on Thursday, escalating long‑simmering tensions over Pakistan’s claim that Afghanistan shelters Pakistani Taliban militants. Afghanistan denies this and argues Pakistan is deflecting blame for its own security failures.

Pakistani Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said they had killed 331 Afghan fighters, destroyed over 100 posts and targeted 37 military locations across Afghanistan. Afghan officials have said that more than 50 Pakistani soldiers have been killed and several Pakistan posts have been captured by their forces. None of the casualty figures or battlefield claims from either side could be independently verified.

Meanwhile, Mosharraf Zaidi, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s spokesperson for foreign media, ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until Kabul addresses the issue as the United States (US) expressed his support for what it called Pakistan’s “right to defend itself” against attacks from Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers.

“There won’t be any talks, there is nothing to talk about... Terrorism from Afghanistan has to end,” Zaidi told Pakistani state media, saying Islamabad would continue to target militant havens inside Afghanistan.

“Pakistan’s responsibility is to protect its citizens. If we know that there is a terrorist in point A and we know that there is a terrorist enabler at point A, we will find a weapon to land at point A and eliminate the threat.”

Zaidi said he didn’t expect Pakistan to deviate from this position and that the government had clearly conveyed what it was doing.

“We have clearly articulated what we are doing and what we plan on continuing to do and what it will take for us to stop doing what we are doing,” Zaidi said.

“And we will expect that both the international community and the regime in question, the Afghan Taliban, will come to their senses and will help reduce instability and disorder in this region.”

Pakistan is a major non-NATO ally of Washington, while the US considers the Afghan Taliban to be a “terrorist” group.

“The United States supports Pakistan’s right to defend itself against attacks from the Taliban, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist group,” Reuters quoted a State Department spokesperson as saying. US diplomat Allison Hooker said on X she spoke on Friday with Pakistan Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch.

The State Department spokesperson said Washington was aware of the escalation in tensions and “outbreak of fighting between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban,” adding the US was “saddened by the loss of life.”

“The Taliban have consistently failed to uphold their counterterrorism commitments,” the State Department said, adding that “terrorist groups use Afghanistan as a launching pad for their heinous attacks.”

Meanwhile, Afghan Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid called for talks to resolve the crisis.

“We have always emphasized peaceful resolution, and now too we want the issue to be resolved through dialogue,” he said on Friday afternoon.

Asked what Pakistan desired, Information Minister Tarar said: “Neutralizing the threat and ensuring that Pakistan is safe.”

“Because for us, we’ve been good neighbors, we’ve been very friendly neighbors, we’ve been very, very generous neighbors. Our generosity, unfortunately, has often been seen as our weakness,” he told state media.

“So the objective, aim is to neutralize the threat and make Pakistan safe.”

To a question about a ceasefire, Tarar said it was “too early” to comment on that as it was an evolving situation.