Final arguments in Jimmy Lai’s national security trial in Hong Kong delayed over health concerns

Police officers stand guard outside the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts building for the closing submissions in the national security collusion trial of Jimmy Lai, in Hong Kong on Aug. 15, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 15 August 2025
Follow

Final arguments in Jimmy Lai’s national security trial in Hong Kong delayed over health concerns

  • Jimmy Lai was arrested in 2020 under a national security law imposed by Beijing following anti-government protests in 2019
  • He faces charges of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security and conspiring with others to issue seditious publications

HONG KONG: The final arguments in prominent Hong Kong activist Jimmy Lai’s national security trial were postponed Friday after his lawyer said the former pro-democracy newspaper founder had experienced heart palpitations and the judges wanted him to receive medical treatment first.

Lai, the 77-year-old founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper, was arrested in 2020 under a national security law imposed by Beijing following anti-government protests in 2019. He faces charges of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security and conspiring with others to issue seditious publications. If convicted, he faces up to life imprisonment.

Lai’s landmark case – which has already lasted over 140 days, far beyond the original estimate of 80 days – is widely seen as a trial of press freedom and a test for judicial independence in the Asian financial hub.

Closing statements were initially scheduled to begin on Thursday, but were postponed due to heavy rains from Tropical Storm Podul.

On Friday, Lai’s lawyer, Robert Pang, told the court that Lai felt unsteady and had experienced heart palpitations. Pang said his client does not want to disturb the court proceedings.

Judge Esther Toh said Lai had not received medication and a heart monitor, as recommended by a medical specialist. The judges decided to postpone the hearing until Monday.

When Lai entered the courtroom, he smiled and nodded at people sitting in the public gallery.

Lai’s detention has drawn attention from foreign governments. US President Donald Trump, before the election last November, was asked whether he would talk to Chinese leader Xi Jinping to seek Lai’s release, and Trump said: “One hundred percent, I will get him out.”

In a Fox News radio interview released Thursday, Trump denied saying he would “100 percent” save Lai. “I said, 100 percent, I’m going to be bringing it up. And I’ve already brought it up, and I’m going to do everything I can to save him,” he said.

Lai’s son and rights groups have voiced concerns about his health. His son Sebastien Lai earlier told reporters in Washington that he fears his father could pass away at any time.

On Tuesday, global media watchdog Reporters Without Borders said Lai has been held in solidarity confinement for over 1,680 days and that his health is deteriorating. In a statement, it called for the international community to take action to ensure the immediate release of Lai and six other former Apple Daily executives involved in the case.

But the Hong Kong government rejected in a statement on Wednesday what it called “slanderous remarks” by external forces, including “anti-China media organizations,” about the case and Lai’s custody treatment.

Ahead of the hearing, dozens of people lined up outside the court building to secure a seat in the main courtroom. Some of them also waited for hours in heavy rain on Thursday before the postponement, including resident Margaret Chan.

Chan, who arrived before 5:30 a.m. on Friday, said Lai’s case showed the world the decline in Hong Kong’s press freedom.

“To me, he’s a great person. He made such a big sacrifice. He’s so rich. He could have predicted this, and he could have left,” said Chan.


From AI to Starlink: how drone tech is reshaping war in Ukraine

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

From AI to Starlink: how drone tech is reshaping war in Ukraine

KYIV: As the war in Ukraine drags into its fifth year, drones have come to completely dominate the front line — a transformation in modern warfare that is being watched around the world.
Here is a look at the technology that is reshaping the war, four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion by pouring tanks and men over the border:

- Kill zone -

Ranging from cheap commercial devices designed for civilian use to explosive-packed miniature aircraft, drones are responsible for up to 80 percent of battlefield damage, Ukraine’s Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov has said.
“Modern warfare is now impossible without drones,” Koleso, a Ukrainian infantry soldier, told AFP in eastern Ukraine.
The front line has been transformed into a “kill zone” stretching up to 20 kilometers (12 miles) deep — “an area between two sides where nothing can survive because it’s constantly monitored by drones,” military expert Kateryna Bondar explained.
Soldiers can only operate there in small groups, moving fast and with their eyes fixed to the sky, hoping to stay undetected.
Heavy pieces of artillery, as well as sluggish tanks and armored vehicles, are too slow and visible — making them easy targets for both sides.
Unwilling to send more men that necessary into the kill zone, Ukrainian troops use ground drones to ferry supplies to dangerous areas and to evacuate wounded soldiers.

- Fibre optics -

Maintaining a stable connection between the drone and its operator, controlling it remotely, is a crucial task.
“That’s where the real race is happening — communications and connections,” Bondar said.
Initially, most drones operated on a radio connection.
But they proved vulnerable to electronic warfare — the practice of jamming and intercepting enemy craft, causing them to drop out of the sky or lose connection to the operator.
Russia has turned to drones controlled by ultra-thin fiber-optic cables, largely immune to electronic jamming.
In scenes that resemble a dystopian sci-fi movie, their widespread use has left swathes of frontline cities and fields entombed in webs of cable.

- Starlink -

In another alternative to radio control, Ukrainians have begun attaching Starlink terminals to drones.
This allows them to fly using a satellite Internet connection.
“We need to fly far away with a stable video signal and stable control,” said Phoenix, a commander from Ukraine’s Lasar Group, a pioneer in the use of Starlink.
Russian troops soon started copying, until Ukraine pushed Elon Musk last month to disable unauthorized Russian terminals.
The move disrupted both Russian and Ukrainian systems, military observers said.
The US-based Institute for the Study of War said the switch-off likely helped enable a localized, but rapid, Ukrainian advance in the southern Zaporizhzhia region in early February.

- Air defenses -

The spread of drones has forced a revamp of air defense systems.
Firing advanced missiles — which can cost millions — to down drones worth just a fraction of that is too expensive a response.
Alongside jamming, Ukraine has also developed cheap interceptor drones built specially to destroy other craft mid-air.
“We opened the chapter of the war of drones with drones,” said Marko Kushnir of General Cherry, a leading interceptor drone maker.
Roads near the front have been equipped with protective nets attempting to stop attacking drones, while trucks fitted with anti-drone cages and drone jammers speed along them.
Machine guns are also a last resort to shoot down drones from the sky.
Ukraine’s Western allies have increasingly looked to Kyiv’s experience after Russian drones made repeat incursions into European airspace in recent months.

- AI -

Engineers are racing to equip drones with artificial intelligence to improve their performance.
Ukrainian firms such as The Fourth Law (TFL) say they have developed so-called terminal guidance, which allows AI to take control of a device in the final moments before impact.
This is meant to improve the accuracy of strikes, especially as connection is typically lost in the final moments before a hit.
“Russia and China are also developing such technologies, and if our countries don’t... we will lose,” said TFL’s Maksym Savanevskyi.
But full autonomy remains some way off.
“AI is performing a helping function rather than substituting human,” said Bondar, the military expert.
“I thought they could simply remove people from battle equipment, that it could be fully automated. That’s a naive view,” said former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, now head of SwiftBeat, a company that supplies AI drones to Ukraine’s army.
“For the foreseeable future, you’ll have drones first, people second,” he told a conference in Kyiv.
All the way on the eastern front, Koleso said foot soldiers would always remain relevant.
“Until you plant the flag yourself, with your own hands, and take the position, it cannot be considered yours,” he said.