Americans split on Trump’s use of military in immigration protests, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

1 / 2
Protesters run from police as they use tear gas and flash-bangs at the Federal Building in Santa Ana, California, on June 9, 2025. (The Orange County Register via AP)
2 / 2
Protesters lie on the ground in front of police outside the US Citizenship and Immigration Services Santa Ana Field Office during a protest action on June 9, 2025.(AFP)
Short Url
Updated 13 June 2025
Follow

Americans split on Trump’s use of military in immigration protests, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

  • Poll shows partisan divide on military use in protests
  • Few approve of Trump’s handling of Los Angeles protests
  • Support for increased deportations remains mainstream in US

WASHINGTON: Americans are divided over President Donald Trump’s decision to activate the military to respond to protests against his crackdown on migrants, with about half supportive of the move, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Thursday.
Some 48 percent of respondents in the two-day poll agreed with a statement that the president should “deploy the military to bring order to the streets” when protests turn violent, while 41 percent disagreed. Views on the matter split sharply along partisan lines, with members of Trump’s Republican Party overwhelmingly backing the idea of calling in troops while Democrats were firmly opposed.
At the same time, just 35 percent of respondents said they approved of Trump’s response to the protests in Los Angeles, which has included sending National Guard troops and US Marines to the city and also threatening to arrest Democratic officials, including the governor of California. Some 50 percent of people in the poll said they disapproved of Trump’s response.
Trump has argued the military deployment in Los Angeles was needed due to protests there following a series of immigration raids in the city. Some of the demonstrations in Los Angeles have turned violent — leaving burned out cars on city streets — and 46 percent of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said protesters opposing Trump’s immigration policies had gone too far, compared to 38 percent who disagreed with that view.
The protests have spread to other US cities including New York, Chicago, Washington and San Antonio, Texas — all of which have large immigrant populations and tend to vote for Democrats rather than Republicans.
Trump campaigned and won last year’s election on a promise to increase deportations of undocumented immigrants and Reuters/Ipsos polls have shown that his support on immigration policy has been consistently higher than on other matters, such as his stewardship of the US economy.
The Reuters/Ipsos poll, which surveyed 1,136 Americans nationwide and has a margin of error of about 3 percentage points, showed wide support for increased deportations. Some 52 percent of respondents — including one in five Democrats and nine in 10 Republicans — backed ramping up deportations of people in the country illegally. Still, 49 percent of people in the poll said Trump had gone too far with his arrests of immigrants, compared to 40 percent who said he had not done so.
The most heated protests have taken place in Los Angeles County, where one in three residents are immigrants and about half of people born abroad are naturalized US citizens, according to US Census estimates.
Nationwide, Americans took a generally dim view of Trump’s threats to arrest Democratic officials like California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat. Just 35 percent of respondents said Trump should order arrests of state and local officials who try to stop federal immigration enforcement.


Panama court annuls Hong Kong firm’s canal port concession

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Panama court annuls Hong Kong firm’s canal port concession

  • The Supreme Court found the laws which allowed CK Hutchison Holdings to operate two of the five ports of the canal ‘unconstitutional’
PANAMA CITY: The Panamanian Supreme Court on Thursday annulled the concession allowing Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison to operate ports at the Panama Canal, a year after US President Donald Trump threatened to seize the crucial passageway claiming China controlled it.
The Supreme Court found the laws which allowed CK Hutchison Holdings to operate two of the five ports of the canal “unconstitutional,” according to a court statement.
The lawsuit to cancel the concession was brought before the Panamanian high court last year on allegations that it was based on unconstitutional laws and that the Hong Kong business was not paying taxes.
Panama Ports Company — a CK Hutchison Holdings subsidiary — currently manages the ports of Cristobal on the canal’s Atlantic side and Balboa on the Pacific side.
That arrangement was automatically renewed in 2021 for another 25 years.
The case came after Trump threatened just days into his second term last year to take back the canal — built by the United States and handed to Panama in 1999 — as he said China was effectively “operating” it.
CK Hutchison Holdings is one of Hong Kong’s largest conglomerates, spanning finance, retail, infrastructure, telecoms and logistics.
It has sought to sell the Panama Canal ports to a consortium led by US asset manager BlackRock.