Musk-Trump breakup puts billions in SpaceX contracts at risk, jolting US space program

SpaceX headquarters is shown in Hawthorne, California, on June 5, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 06 June 2025
Follow

Musk-Trump breakup puts billions in SpaceX contracts at risk, jolting US space program

  • Trump threatens to cancel Musk companies’ contracts amid tax cut bill dispute
  • Musk says SpaceX will decommission spacecraft used by NASA

WASHINGTON: About $22 billion worth of SpaceX’s government contracts is at risk and multiple US space programs could face dramatic changes in the fallout of Elon Musk and President Donald Trump’s explosive feud on Thursday.
The disagreement, rooted in Musk’s criticism of Trump’s tax-cut and spending legislation that began last week, quickly spiraled out of control. Trump lashed out at Musk when the president spoke in the Oval Office. Then in a series of X posts, Musk launched barbs at Trump, who threatened to terminate government contracts with Musk’s companies.
Taking the threat seriously, Musk said he would begin “decommissioning” SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft used by NASA. Under a roughly $5 billion contract, the craft has been the agency’s only US vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station, making Musk’s company a critical element of the US space program.




In this photo illustration, social media posts by US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk are displayed on a smartphone on June 05, 2025. (Getty Images via AFP)

The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump’s initiative to downsize the federal government.
If the president prioritized political retaliation and canceled billions of dollars worth of SpaceX contracts with NASA and the Pentagon, it could slow US space progress.
NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but said: “We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president’s objectives in space are met.”
Musk and Trump’s tussle ruptured an unprecedented relationship between a US president and industry titan that had yielded some key favors for SpaceX: a proposed overhaul of NASA’s moon program into a Mars program, a planned effort to build a gigantic missile defense shield in space, and the naming of an Air Force leader who favored SpaceX in a contract award.
Taking Dragon out of service would likely disrupt the ISS program, which involves dozens of countries under a two-decade-old international agreement. But it was unclear how quickly such a decommissioning would occur. NASA uses Russia’s Soyuz spacecraft as a secondary ride for its astronauts to the ISS.

SpaceX’s rise
SpaceX rose to dominance long before Musk’s foray into Republican politics last year, building formidable market share in the rocket launch and satellite communications industries that could shield it somewhat from Musk’s split with Trump, analysts said.
“It fortunately wouldn’t be catastrophic, since SpaceX has developed itself into a global powerhouse that dominates most of the space industry, but there’s no question that it would result in significant lost revenue and missed contract opportunities,” said Justus Parmar, CEO of SpaceX investor Fortuna Investments.
Under Trump in recent months, the US space industry and NASA’s workforce of 18,000 have been whipsawed by looming layoffs and proposed budget cuts that would cancel dozens of science programs, while the US space agency remains without a confirmed administrator.
Trump’s nominee for NASA administrator, Musk ally and billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, appeared to be an early casualty of Musk’s rift with the president when the White House abruptly removed him from consideration over the weekend, denying Musk his pick to lead the space agency.

 

Trump on Thursday explained dumping Isaacman by saying he was “totally Democrat.”
Musk’s quest to send humans to Mars has been a critical element of Trump’s space agenda. The effort has threatened to take resources away from NASA’s flagship effort to send humans back to the moon.
Trump’s budget plan sought to cancel Artemis moon missions beyond its third mission, effectively ending the over-budget Space Launch System rocket used for those missions.
But the Senate Commerce Committee version of Trump’s bill released late on Thursday would restore funding for missions four and five, providing at least $1 billion annually for SLS through 2029.
Since SpaceX’s rockets are a less expensive alternative to SLS, whether the Trump administration opposes the Senate’s changes in the coming weeks will give an indication of Musk’s remaining political power.
SpaceX, founded in 2002, has won $15 billion worth of contracts from NASA for the company’s Falcon 9 rockets and development of SpaceX’s Starship, a multipurpose rocket system tapped to land NASA astronauts on the moon this decade.
The company has also won billions of dollars to launch a majority of the Pentagon’s national security satellites into space while it builds a massive spy satellite constellation in orbit for a US intelligence agency.
In addition to not being in US interests, former NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said canceling SpaceX’s contracts would probably not be legal.
But she also added, “A rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts lives at risk, is untenable.”


Adrien Brody reflects on craft, collaboration and creative resolve at RSIFF 2025

Updated 20 sec ago
Follow

Adrien Brody reflects on craft, collaboration and creative resolve at RSIFF 2025

JEDDAH: Two-time Academy Award winner Adrien Brody captivated audiences at the Red Sea International Film Festival in Jeddah, where he spoke candidly about craft, collaboration, and the evolving landscape of global cinema.

Brody, who first made history in 2003 as the youngest-ever Best Actor Oscar winner for “The Pianist,” arrived at the festival following a triumphant year with Brady Corbet’s “The Brutalist,” a film that has earned him the Academy Award, BAFTA, Golden Globe, and Critics’ Choice Award for Best Actor.

The film, which premiered to acclaim at Venice and has since become an international success, features Brody as architect Laszlo Toth in one of his most demanding roles to date. His career, spanning decades and genres, includes standout performances in “Asteroid City,” “Blonde,” “Succession,” “The Grand Budapest Hotel,” “Peaky Blinders,” and “Winning Time.” He has collaborated with some of cinema’s most distinct voices, from Wes Anderson and Peter Jackson to Spike Lee and Roman Polanski.

Beyond acting, Brody leads Fable House Films and maintains a parallel career as a visual artist, exhibiting works in New York, Art Basel and international galleries. Raised in New York City, he trained at LaGuardia High School and the American Academy of Dramatic Arts, roots he often credits for shaping his artistic appetite.

Brody began his “In Conversation” session by expressing admiration for Saudi Arabia’s rapid creative growth: “It’s been pretty packed. Lots of activities but just wonderful to be here and witness the evolution of the festival and what Saudi’s doing in film and creative empowerment for so many people.”

He went on to praise the new generation of storytellers emerging from the region:

“New directors, women whose voices are underserved, and I find that really wonderful and admirable … It’s been very special.”

Before taking the stage, the packed audience was shown a clip from “The Brutalist,” a fitting prelude for a conversation that dove deeply into the complexity of portraying driven, conflicted characters.

Saudi director Hakeem Jomah, who moderated the session, asked Brody about the pressure of embodying characters shaped by real history.

Brody began by clarifying the creative space within “The Brutalist,” saying: “As real and true to life that ‘Brutalist’ is, it’s a fictional story … My journey primarily is about the struggle for driven artistic people to persevere and have their vision endure in spite of the wants and needs of the benefactor.”

He explained how the film reflects universal challenges faced by artists and creators, adding: “Sometimes you are blessed with the support of your financiers … and sometimes you’re not. This film really delves very deeply into the oppressiveness of that.”

Brody emphasized the personal and emotional toll these narratives carry.

“Every film, every role that an actor agrees to undertake is its own journey,” he said, describing acting as an intensely internal and empathetic process.

Brody described his method as one rooted in emotional truth and responsiveness:

“If you can find ways to connect at least to the emotionality and the circumstances that feel relatable … it is expressed somehow through the responsibility of carrying out the dialogue.”

He acknowledged the difficulties of portraying experiences far removed from his own, especially in films set in other eras or involving trauma. Actors, he said, must “find ways to understand those better, internalize them” and convey them responsibly.

When asked whether he prefers working collaboratively or in isolation during preparation, Brody emphasized balance: “I have to show up knowing who I am, what I’m here to do … There has to be a degree of malleability because making a movie is a collaboration … yet an actor has a very distinct responsibility.”

He added that defending a character’s authenticity is sometimes necessary, noting how fortunate he has been to work with directors who are “greatly respectful and inspiring.”

He explained that cinematography and performance must function as a unified language, saying the camera’s distance or intimacy can radically shape the emotional connection with the audience. This, he stressed, requires alignment among actor, director, and cinematographer to ensure that the visual storytelling truly serves the narrative.

Brody reflected briefly on his long experience in the industry, “I’ve been working professionally on camera since I was 12.”

He expressed gratitude for a lifetime in film, noting that his experience helps him support the process while also recognizing that the director ultimately shapes the final work. He spoke about the unpredictable nature of filmmaking, technical issues, lost footage, and the surprises of the editing room, reminding the audience that even the best work can be undone by a corrupted file or a physical flaw on celluloid.

Shifting to the physical and emotional demands of filmmaking, Brody explained that there is no such thing as holding back on set.

He noted that time feels distorted during a production, especially one as intense as “The Brutalist,” which, despite being a three-and-a-half-hour epic shot on VistaVision, was completed in just 23 days. The process left the entire team depleted but also bonded them through shared stamina and commitment.

Brody described his own methods of preserving emotional depth: “I don’t hang out with my fellow actors and crew when I have any heavy lifting … I’m often alone. I sometimes won’t eat lunch to not be tired.”

These disciplined rituals allow him to show up fully for demanding scenes, though he reminds younger actors that “it’s not a science, and you’re not a machine.”

When Jomah asked how Brody decides which scripts to accept, the actor joked warmly about the host’s career change: “These are wonderful questions and thank you … This man is a doctor as well … I’m very impressed by him.”

He then explained his criteria for choosing projects, calling each film “a journey” that must offer artistic meaning and the potential for personal discovery. Commercial success, he noted, is a consideration, but never the only one.

Asked whether his accolades make him feel freer or more pressured in his choices, Brody responded, “I assumed that I had less to prove … but you have a responsibility to a career trajectory … I’ve not taken films since ‘The Brutalist’ … They didn’t feel quite right.”

Brody closed with reflections on the transformations reshaping the industry: “We’re living in a time that there’s immense shifts in every field … Technology is a major factor.”

He spoke nostalgically about growing up before digital devices, learning from filmmakers who relied on physical stunts and in-camera effects. While he acknowledged the power of new tools, he stressed that technology must never overshadow human emotion.

“There is nothing to replace emotion … We should always cherish and support the creative process and the beauty of filmmaking.”