Hezbollah seeks boost in Lebanon vote as disarmament calls grow

Iran-backed Lebanese militant group aims to maintain political sway after pounding in war with Israel. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 23 May 2025
Follow

Hezbollah seeks boost in Lebanon vote as disarmament calls grow

  • Iran-backed Lebanese militant group aims to maintain political sway after pounding in war with Israel
  • Reconstruction aid for Lebanon tied to Hezbollah disarmament, foreign minister says

NABATIEH: Amid the rubble left by Israeli bombardment of south Lebanon, campaign posters urge support for Hezbollah in elections on Saturday as the group aims to show it retains political clout despite the pounding it took in last year’s war.
For Hezbollah, the local vote is more important than ever, coinciding with mounting calls for its disarmament and continued Israeli airstrikes, and as many of its Shiite Muslim constituents still suffer the repercussions of the conflict.
Three rounds of voting already held this month have gone well for the Iran-backed group. In the south, many races won’t be contested, handing Hezbollah and its allies early wins.
“We will vote with blood,” said Ali Tabaja, 21, indicating loyalty to Hezbollah. He’ll be voting in the city of Nabatieh rather than his village of Adaisseh because it is destroyed.
“It’s a desert,” he said.
The south’s rubble-strewn landscape reflects the devastating impact of the war, which began when Hezbollah opened fire in support of Hamas at the start in October 2023 of the Gaza conflict and culminated in a major Israeli offensive.
Hezbollah emerged a shadow of its former self, with its leaders and thousands of its fighters killed, its influence over the Lebanese state greatly diminished, and its Lebanese opponents gaining sway.
In a measure of how far the tables have turned, the new government has declared it aims to establish a state monopoly on arms, meaning Hezbollah should disarm — as stipulated by the US-brokered ceasefire with Israel.
Against this backdrop, the election results so far indicate “the war didn’t achieve the objective of downgrading Hezbollah’s popularity in the community,” said Mohanad Hage Ali of the Carnegie Middle East Center, a think tank. “On the contrary, many Shia now feel their fate is tied to Hezbollah’s fate.”
Hezbollah’s arms have long been a source of division in Lebanon, sparking a brief civil conflict in 2008. Critics say Hezbollah has unilaterally dragged Lebanon into hostilities.
Foreign Minister Youssef Raji, a Hezbollah opponent, has said that Lebanon has been told there will be no reconstruction aid from foreign donors until the state establishes a monopoly on arms.
Hezbollah, in turn, has put the onus on the government over reconstruction and accuses it of failing to take steps on that front, despite promises that the government is committed to it.

DISARMAMENT TERMS
Hage Ali said that conditioning reconstruction aid on disarmament was intended to expedite the process, but “it’s difficult to see Hezbollah accepting this.”
Hezbollah says its weapons are now gone from the south, but links any discussion of its remaining arsenal to Israel’s withdrawal from five positions it still holds, and an end to Israeli attacks.
Israel says Hezbollah still has combat infrastructure including rocket launchers in the south, calling this “blatant violations of understandings between Israel and Lebanon.”
A French diplomatic source said reconstruction would not materialize if Israel continues striking and the Lebanese government does not act fast enough on disarmament.
Donors also want Beirut to enact economic reforms.
Hashem Haidar, head of the government’s Council for the South, said the state lacks the funds to rebuild, but cited progress in rubble removal. Lebanon needs $11 billion for reconstruction and recovery, the World Bank estimates.
In Nabatieh, a pile of rubble marks the spot where 71-year-old Khalil Tarhini’s store once stood. It was one of dozens destroyed by Israeli bombardment in Nabatieh’s central market.
He has received no compensation, and sees little point in voting. Expressing a sense of abandonment, he said: “The state did not stand by us.”
The situation was very different in 2006, after a previous Hezbollah-Israel war. Aid flowed from Iran and Gulf Arab states.
Hezbollah says it has aided 400,000 people, paying for rent, furniture and renovations. But the funds at its disposal appear well short of 2006, recipients say.
Hezbollah says state authorities have obstructed funds arriving from Iran, though Tehran is also more financially strapped than two decades ago due to tougher US sanctions and the reimposition of a “maximum pressure” policy by Washington.
As for Gulf states, their spending on Lebanon dried up as Hezbollah became embroiled in regional conflicts and they declared it a terrorist group in 2016. Saudi Arabia has echoed the Lebanese government’s position of calling for a state monopoly of arms.
Hezbollah lawmaker Hassan Fadlallah said it was up to the government to secure reconstruction funding and that it was failing to take “serious steps” to get the process on track.
He warned that the issue risked deepening divisions in Lebanon if unaddressed. “How can one part of the nation be stable while another is in pain?” he said, referring to Shiites in the south and other areas, including Beirut’s Hezbollah-dominated southern suburbs, hard hit by Israel.


Top ex-British Army officers urge complete arms embargo on Israel

Updated 13 sec ago
Follow

Top ex-British Army officers urge complete arms embargo on Israel

  • Evidence of war crimes in Gaza is ‘so well documented and compelling’
  • Appeal made in letter to UK PM ‘to avoid the charge of complicity’

LONDON: Four former senior members of the British Army have urged the government to impose a complete arms embargo on Israel, The Times reported.

They also called for a ban on any British involvement in Israeli-owned or Israeli-supported arms manufacturers.

The appeal came in a letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in which the signatories said that amid Gaza’s fragile ceasefire, “now is not the time to return to business as usual with the Israeli government.” More severe sanctions must be placed on Israel, they said.

The letter was signed by John Deverell, a retired brigadier general who served for more than 30 years, and Sir Andrew Graham, a retired lieutenant general and former director general of the Defence Academy of the UK. Deverell was defense attache in Saudi Arabia and Yemen at the time of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Maj. Gen Peter Currie and Maj. Gen. Charlie Herbert, a former senior British Army commander in Afghanistan, are also signatories.

The army is set to decide next year whether to award the British subsidiary of Elbit Systems, a major weapons company, a £2 billion ($2.7 billion) training contract for soldiers, aimed at future preparedness.

Elbit Systems UK is part of a consortium of defense companies bidding for the substantial 15-year contract offered by the British Army. Raytheon UK leads the competing consortium.

The signatories strongly pushed back against a claim that Israel’s military had followed similar protocols to the British Army during the war on Gaza.

They challenged remarks by a senior UK Ministry of Defence source who said: “Israel appears to have thorough and rigorous processes for the conduct of hostilities and targeting, that in many respects resemble our own.”

They said British military practices have clear differences with Israel’s ones, including the latter’s indiscriminate firing of munitions that led to “exceptionally disproportionate and avoidable civilian fatalities, and widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure.”

They added that the UK should ban Israeli officers from attending British military courses, and prevent UK defense officials from taking part in visits to Israel.

The letter also highlighted the issue of famine in Gaza, noting that more than 100 humanitarian organizations have expressed grave concerns over conditions in the war-torn Palestinian enclave.

Israel’s military had frequently targeted hospitals, schools and other sites essential for civilian survival, they said, citing humanitarian groups.

The signatories also referred to high-profile reports of Palestinian detainees facing torture in Israeli custody.

Evidence of Israeli war crimes is “so well documented and compelling that the British government should cut all military collaboration with Israel forthwith, to avoid the charge of complicity,” they said.

The group also called on the UK government to prevent the use of Royal Air Force or British-contracted aircraft in any Israeli military activities. Britain should also suspend any transfer of military technology to Israel, they said.