Islamabad court restores twice weekly visits with jailed ex-PM Khan 

Police personnel stand outside the entrance of Adiala jail during the hearing of jailed former Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan, in Rawalpindi on January 30, 2024. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 24 March 2025
Follow

Islamabad court restores twice weekly visits with jailed ex-PM Khan 

  • Superintendent Adiala Jail where Khan is imprisoned had used discretionary powers to limit visits to Tuesdays and Thursdays only
  • Khan has been in jail since August 2023 and faces a slew of cases, from corruption to reason, that he says are politically motivated

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday restored twice weekly visiting rights for incarcerated former Prime Minister Imran Khan, allowing his family, lawyers and political aides to meet him on Tuesdays and Thursdays, his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party said.

A three-member larger bench was hearing 26 petitions related to visitation rights and jail conditions for Khan. Abdul Ghafoor Anjum, the superintendent at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi where Khan has been incarcerated since 2023, had used his discretionary powers to limit the former premier’s meetings to Tuesdays only. 

Khan’s cases have been tried inside prison on security grounds after he was jailed, and he has not been seen in public since. His messages to the public are conveyed by his lawyers and his social media accounts. 

During the hearing of the petitions on Monday, Khan’s counsel Zaheer Abbas said he was scheduled to meet his family and lawyers on Tuesday and his friends on Thursday, but the Thursday meeting was not being allowed. 

“IHC has ordered the jail authorities to resume meetings with Khan, of family, legal team and political leadership twice a week (Tuesday and Thursday) while banning media talk outside Rawalpindi Adiala Jail after the meetings,” the PTI party said in a statement. 

“Though it’s unfair to stop family and leadership to keep the media and public posted with the message from Khan but given the blatant bias toward the party and chairman, the legal team has opted to go for resuming biweekly meetings with Imran Khan.”

Nav­eed Malik, representing the jail superintendent, said Khan had been holding meetings in jail twice a week until he was convicted and handed a 14-year sentence in a land corruption case in January.

“The status of the founder of PTI has changed after being convicted in jail,” the lawyer informed the court. 

“According to the jail rules, the superintendent of Adiala Jail has the authority [to schedule the meetings accordingly].”

Malik said PTI leaders had been misusing the privilege of the meetings and making political statements outside Adiala jail. 

“After the meeting, they come outside the jail and make political statements to the media, this is a violation,” he argued. 

The judge heading the bench then ruled that Khan’s family and aides could meet him twice a week but should leave after the meetings and not engage in political activity outside the jail premises. 

“We take an undertaking from them that they will not talk to the media after jail meeting,” he said, adding that only the coordinator of the incarcerated PTI founder, Salman Akram Raja, who is the PTI general secretary, would name those allowed to meet him.

The jail superintendent’s lawyer said two meetings could be arranged weekly if Khan’s visitors provided assurances “that they will not come out and have political discussions.”

Khan has been in prison since August 2023 and faces a slew of cases, from corruption to treason, that he says are politically motivated. 

In January, the former premier, 72, was convicted on charges that he and his wife were given land by a real estate developer during his premiership from 2018 to 2022 in exchange for illegal favors. Khan and Bibi had pleaded not guilty. 


Walnut tree remains ‘under arrest’ for over a century, living symbol of colonial power in Pakistan

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Walnut tree remains ‘under arrest’ for over a century, living symbol of colonial power in Pakistan

  • British officer is said to have ordered chaining of the tree in 1898, a reminder of the absolute authority and psychological control enforced under colonial rule in Khyber Pass region
  • Locals and historians say the shackled tree survives as a physical memory of the Frontier Crimes Regulation era, when even nature could be punished to discipline subjects and display power

LANDI KOTAL, KHYBER: In the military cantonment of Landi Kotal, close to Pakistan’s Torkham border crossing with Afghanistan and the mouth of the historic Khyber Pass, a single walnut tree stands bound in heavy iron chains.

It has been this way for more than a century, a surreal, almost absurd monument to the power structures and punitive imagination of the British Empire’s rule in the tribal frontier.

Black shackles still brace parts of its branches, giving it the appearance of a theatrical installation. To locals, it is a wound that never fully healed, a reminder that even nature could be punished when authority wished to show dominance.

Local oral histories trace the origin of this bizarre imprisonment to 1898, when a British officer named James Squid, allegedly intoxicated, believed the tree was moving toward him and instantly ordered it arrested. Soldiers carried out the instruction and the walnut tree has never been freed since.

Muhammad Sardar, the caretaker who oversees the site today, recounted the story as it has been passed down for generations.

“This British military official at that time was drunk and thought this walnut tree was moving toward him to attack him,” he told Arab News. “The officer ordered to arrest this tree, hence the soldiers had to obey the order and arrest this tree.”

Whether the event unfolded exactly as described is impossible to verify, but historians and residents agree on what the continued chaining represented: the unquestionable authority of colonial power.

A LAW THAT COULD BIND PEOPLE — AND TREES

Landi Kotal was one of the most militarized points of the British-controlled frontier, a strategic chokepoint along the Khyber Pass, a route armies, traders and empires have used for thousands of years. To control the region, the British introduced the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR), a law that denied locals the right to appeal, hire lawyers or challenge government decisions. Entire tribes could be punished for the suspected action of one member.

The chained walnut tree is often interpreted as a physical embodiment of that era: a warning made visible.

Dr. Syed Waqar Ali Shah, Assistant Professor of History at the University of Peshawar, said the symbolism was deliberate.

“It was an assertion of their [British] authority, it was a symbol of their power. Right. It’s a funny thing as well, because it’s something which was under the influence of some intoxication,” he explained.

“The officer behaved or gave orders for the imprisonment of that particular tree under the influence of some intoxicants.”

Dr. Shah continued:

“It was something which was a symbol of colonial authority, assertion of their authority, of bureaucratic diplomacy, a symbol of their bureaucratic strength and power, and maybe some cultural encounter as well.”

He added that such displays endured because “it was a cultural link between the locals and the colonial power. So it was a reflection of that. But later on, they continued with it in the presence of FCR (Frontier Crimes Regulation) and regulations like this.”

Even once the officer sobered, the chains remained.

Dr. Shah believes that was intentional: psychological messaging meant to instill conformity and fear in people living under colonial law.

“Their objective and purpose was to make it a symbol of discipline for the masses. It was an exhibition of power, a sheer exhibition of power, a symbol that if we can do this to something which was inhuman … if they can deal with a tree like this, so the general public, they should be aware that discipline is very important.”

Landi Kotal’s older residents say their fathers and grandfathers retold the story long before Pakistan existed and long before independence movements dismantled the Raj.

Usman Khan Shinwari, a 26-year-old shopkeeper, said the story continues to live in households like a family inheritance.

“My grandfather would often narrate this story of the arrested tree,” he recalled. “My grandfather would say that it shows how the then rulers were treating the locals and what our ancestors had endured.”

Over a century later, long after the end of British rule and the formal abolition of the Frontier Crimes Regulation in 2018, the walnut tree remains exactly where it was chained, part spectacle, part scar.

Tourists sometimes come to photograph it. Others stand silently before it.

But for many in Khyber, it is neither attraction nor curiosity.

It is proof that power once flowed one way only. A tree could be punished, so people learned not to resist.