Pentagon is sending up to 1,500 active duty troops to help secure US-Mexico border

A drone view shows members of the Mexican military setting up a mobile kitchen, where Mexican authorities will build a temporary shelter for migrants deported from the United States, in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 24 January 2025
Follow

Pentagon is sending up to 1,500 active duty troops to help secure US-Mexico border

WASHINGTON: The Pentagon said Wednesday it has begun deploying 1,500 active duty troops to help secure the southern border in the coming days, putting in motion plans President Donald Trump laid out in executive orders shortly after he took office to crack down on immigration.
Acting Defense Secretary Robert Salesses said the Pentagon will provide military aircraft to support Department of Homeland Security deportation flights for more than 5,000 detained migrants and the troops will assist in the construction of barriers.
The number of troops and their mission may soon change, Salesses said in a statement. “This is just the beginning,” he said.
It remains to be seen if they will end up doing law enforcement, which would put American troops in a dramatically different role for the first time in decades.
The active duty forces will join the roughly 2,500 US National Guard and Reserve forces already there. There are currently no active duty troops working along the roughly 2,000-mile border.
Personnel started moving to the border earlier Wednesday, according to a military official briefing reporters on the condition of anonymity to provide additional details on the deployment. The troops will include 500 Marines from Camp Pendleton in California, and the remainder will be Army.
Troops have done similar duties in support of Border Patrol agents in the past, when both Trump and former President Joe Biden sent active duty troops to the border.
Troops are prohibited by law from doing law enforcement duties under the Posse Comitatus Act, but that may change. Trump has directed through executive order that the incoming secretary of defense and incoming homeland security chief report back within 90 days if they think an 1807 law called the Insurrection Act should be invoked. That would allow those troops to be used in civilian law enforcement on US soil.
The last time the act was invoked was in 1992 during rioting in Los Angeles in protest of the acquittal of four police officers charged with beating Rodney King.
The widely expected deployment, coming in Trump’s first week in office, was an early step in his long-touted plan to expand the use of the military along the border. In one of his first orders on Monday, Trump directed the defense secretary to come up with a plan to “seal the borders” and repel “unlawful mass migration.”
“This is something President Trump campaigned on,” said Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary. “The American people have been waiting for such a time as this — for our Department of Defense to actually implement homeland security seriously. This is a No. 1 priority for the American people.”
On Tuesday, just as Trump fired the Coast Guard commandant, Adm. Linda Fagan, the service announced it was surging more cutter ships, aircraft and personnel to the “Gulf of America” — a nod to the president’s directive to rename the Gulf of Mexico.
Trump said during his inaugural address on Monday that “I will declare a national emergency at our southern border. All illegal entry will immediately be halted, and we will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places in which they came.”
Military personnel have been sent to the border almost continuously since the 1990s to help address migration. drug trafficking and transnational crime.
In executive orders signed Monday, Trump suggested the military would help the Department of Homeland Security with “detention space, transportation (including aircraft), and other logistics services.”
There are about 20,000 Border Patrol agents, and while the southern border is where most are located, they’re also responsible for protecting the northern border with Canada. Usually agents are tasked with looking for drug smugglers or people trying to enter the country undetected.
More recently, however, they have had to deal with migrants actively seeking out Border Patrol in order to get refuge in America — taxing the agency’s staff.
In his first term, Trump ordered active duty troops to the border in response to a caravan of migrants slowly making its way through Mexico toward the United States in 2018. More than 7,000 active duty troops were sent to Texas, Arizona and California, including military police, an assault helicopter battalion, various communications, medical and headquarters units, combat engineers, planners and public affairs units.
At the time, the Pentagon was adamant that active duty troops would not do law enforcement. So they spent much of their time transporting Border Patrol agents to and along the border, helping them erect additional vehicle barriers and fencing along the border, assisting them with communications and providing some security for border agent camps.
The military also provided Border Patrol agents with medical care, pre-packaged meals and temporary housing.
It’s also not yet clear if the Trump administration will order the military to use bases to house detained migrants.
Bases previously have been used for that purpose, and after the 2021 fall of Kabul to the Taliban, they were used to host thousands of Afghan evacuees. The facilities struggled to support the influx.
In 2018, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis ordered Goodfellow Air Force Base in San Angelo, Texas, to prepare to house as many as 20,000 unaccompanied migrant children, but the additional space ultimately wasn’t needed and Goodfellow was determined not to have the infrastructure necessary to support the surge.
In March 2021, the Biden administration greenlighted using property at Fort Bliss, Texas, for a detention facility to provide beds for up to 10,000 unaccompanied migrant children as border crossings increased from Mexico.
The facility, operated by DHS, was quickly overrun, with far too few case managers for the thousands of children that arrived, exposure to extreme weather and dust and unsanitary conditions, a 2022 inspector general report found.


What’s next after US Supreme Court tariff ruling?

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

What’s next after US Supreme Court tariff ruling?

WASHINGTON: The Supreme Court’s striking down of President Donald Trump’s global tariffs, while a relief to many, heralds more months of uncertainty as US businesses brace for new levies and a fight for refunds plays out.
What comes next after the conservative-majority court’s decision?

Long road to refunds

The ruling sets up a long fight for tariff refunds, as the duties, now deemed illegal, generated some $133.5 billion from January 2025 to mid-December.
The top court did not address the refunds issue, and analysts say this will be decided by lower courts in the coming months.
The US Court of International Trade is expected to manage this process, said ING analysts Carsten Brzeski and Julian Geib.
“Refunds won’t come automatically, as any importer that wants its money back must sue individually,” they said.
“This process has already kicked off, with over 1,000 corporate entities now involved in a legal fight.”
Trump told reporters Friday: “We’ll end up being in court for the next five years.”

More volatility

Hours after the court decision, Trump vowed to impose a new 10-percent tariff on imports under an alternative authority.
This is widely seen as a temporary move to pave the way for more durable tariffs, but is set to trigger other challenges and upheaval in the meantime.
The law Trump is tapping for this tariff — Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 — only allows for a duty of 150 days unless Congress extends it.
Trump has said there will be new investigations of unfair trade practices under Section 301, a path toward more lasting duties.
Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council, said Friday’s ruling merely “opens a new chapter” in Trump’s tariff policy.
There will be “more uncertainty, more volatility for businesses to navigate, and more fraught trade deals for countries to negotiate,” Lipsky added.

Losing speed

But for now, the court’s decision “removes one of Trump’s fastest tools for imposing broad tariffs,” said ING.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News on Friday that tariffs based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act  “were custom made for President Trump to assert leverage” against other countries.
“We were able to bring them to the table very quickly,” he said.
“We will get back to the same tariff level for the countries,” Bessent vowed. “It will just be in a less direct and slightly more convoluted manner.”

Trade deal uncertainty?

With tariffs imposed via emergency economic powers forming the basis of recent trade talks, analysts warned that some partners may try to rethink their commitments.
Lipsky expects economies that have already made deals to keep them rather than “risk unraveling an agreement which at least has provided some stability.”
But those still finalizing deals may have more leverage now.
Asia Society Policy Institute senior vice president Wendy Cutler expects that walking away from announced deals “does not seem to be in the cards for our partners.”
“They know all too well that such a step could end up leaving them in a worse position with the White House,” she said.

Lower tariffs?

With the Supreme Court ruling, consumers “face an overall average effective tariff rate of 9.1 percent, which remains the highest since 1946 excluding 2025,” according to The Budget Lab at Yale University.
This is down from 16.9 percent.
Despite Trump’s plan to move toward more lasting duties, Navy Federal Credit Union chief economist Heather Long expects Friday’s ruling “will force a reset in tariff policy.”
She anticipates this is “likely to lead to lower overall tariff rates and a more orderly imposition of future tariffs.”