Roger Federer tells friend and rival Rafael Nadal that he made him enjoy tennis more

Roger Federer says Rafael Nadal made him enjoy tennis “even more” during a rivalry that spanned 40 matches over 15 years. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 19 November 2024
Follow

Roger Federer tells friend and rival Rafael Nadal that he made him enjoy tennis more

  • Federer began his message with the word “Vamos” and said: “As you get ready to graduate from tennis, I’ve got a few things to share before I maybe get emotional”
  • “Let’s start with the obvious: you beat me — a lot. More than I managed to beat you”

MALAGA, Spain: Roger Federer says Rafael Nadal made him enjoy tennis “even more” during a rivalry that spanned 40 matches over 15 years.
Writing on social media Tuesday, hours before the start of the Davis Cup Final 8, Nadal’s last event before heading into retirement, Federer began his message with the word “Vamos” and said: “As you get ready to graduate from tennis, I’ve got a few things to share before I maybe get emotional.”
“Let’s start with the obvious: you beat me — a lot. More than I managed to beat you. You challenged me in ways no one else could,” Federer said. “On clay, it felt like I was stepping into your backyard, and you made me work harder than I ever thought I could just to hold my ground. You made me reimagine my game — even going so far as to change the size of my racquet head, hoping for any edge.”
Federer, now 43, was established at No. 1 in the rankings when Nadal, now 38, came along. Federer started his career with a 7-0 record in Grand Slam finals before his first loss at that stage arrived against Nadal in the 2006 French Open final, the first of their three consecutive title matches in Paris — each with the same result.

Nadal also defeated Federer in the 2008 Wimbledon final, ending the Swiss star’s bid for a sixth championship in a row at the All England Club.
In all, Nadal led their head-to-head series 26-14, including 10-4 at Grand Slam tournaments and 6-3 in Slam finals.
Still, Federer told Nadal in his post, referring to him by the nickname Rafa: “You made me enjoy the game even more.”
They helped form the Big Three of men’s tennis along with Novak Djokovic, who is still active at age 37 and has won a men’s-record 24 major trophies. Nadal is next on the list with 22, followed by Federer with 20.
“What an incredible run you’ve had,” Federer posted. “Including 14 French Opens — historic! You made Spain proud ... you made the whole tennis world proud.”
When Federer left the sport by playing a doubles match at the Laver Cup in September 2022, his partner was Nadal. The two sat side-by-side afterward, crying.
“It meant everything to me that you were there by my side — not as my rival but as my doubles partner,” Federer wrote Tuesday. “Sharing the court with you that night, and sharing those tears, will forever be one of the most special moments of my career.”
Nadal’s Spanish team was scheduled to meet the Netherlands in the Davis Cup quarterfinals Tuesday. Neither Nadal nor Spain’s captain, David Ferrer, would say Monday whether Nadal will play singles or doubles, both — or neither.
“Rafa, I know you’re focused on the last stretch of your epic career. We will talk when it’s done,” Federer wrote. “I want you to know that your old friend is always cheering for you, and will be cheering just as loud for everything you do next.”


Swiss politicians call for UEFA’s tax-exempt status to be revoked over stance on Israel

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Swiss politicians call for UEFA’s tax-exempt status to be revoked over stance on Israel

  • ‘A double standard is unacceptable. While UEFA has rightly chosen to sanction Russian teams it has taken no action or measures against Israel to date,’ says one lawmaker
  • Former UN human rights chief says Swiss authorities should know their international reputation as a leading proponent of humanitarian law is on trial

GENEVA: Swiss politicians on Wednesday argued that UEFA’s privileged tax status should be revoked until European football’s governing body ends what critics described as its complicity in the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands.
Local and national parliamentarians issued a statement calling for a vote on the issue, citing a Jul. 19, 2024, ruling by the International Court of Justice that found Israel was illegally occupying Palestinian land, including in the West Bank.
The lawmakers argue that since the Israeli Football Association, which fields teams that play on that occupied land, is a member of UEFA, the legal standing of the governing body and its associated tax advantages in Switzerland, where it has its headquarters, are in question.
They said that the tax relief granted to UEFA means that instead of benefiting from that revenue, Swiss citizens are effectively funding illegal activities of the Israeli Football Association.
“As an international federation, (UEFA) has long benefited, despite its significant commercial activity, from a tax exemption granted specifically because international sports federations play an important role in promoting peace and combating racism and discrimination,” they said in the statement.
“UEFA has long placed these concerns at the heart of its decisions. Its commitment to peace, for example, was among the motivations cited in support of sanctions adopted by the organization following Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. However, it is clear that this objective is not being pursued today.”
Raphael Mahaim, a member of the Swiss National Council, said: “UEFA enjoys preferential tax treatment in Switzerland. This comes with certain obligations, including promoting the values of peace.
“A double standard is unacceptable. While UEFA has rightly chosen to sanction Russian teams, it has taken no action or measures against Israel to date.”
Craig Mokhiber, an international human rights lawyer and former director of the UN’s human rights office in New York, said: “On Dec. 10 (International Human Rights Day) Swiss and cantonal authorities started the debate on the continuation of UEFA’s privileged tax status.
“That status should be revoked until UEFA ends its complicity in the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian land.”
Swiss authorities should know that their international reputation as a leading proponent of humanitarian law is itself on trial in this process, he added.
Theophile Schenker, a member of the Cantonal Parliament of Vaud, the canton in which UEFA’s headquarters is located, said: “UEFA must choose: either it genuinely acts to promote peace and can benefit from the advantages it offers, or it completely abandons this objective and its tax exemption.
“In the first case, it cannot remain passive when the IFA condones illegal and discriminatory practices, which are contrary to sporting values.”
Ashish Prashar, a former adviser to the Middle East Peace Envoy, and campaign director for the Game Over Israel pressure group, said: “UEFA is at the forefront of funding and normalizing the apartheid and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian territories, by continuing to provide a subsidy and allowing the IFA to be a member.
“This is money that could be going into the Swiss coffers; instead, the public is funding the illegal activities of the IFA.”
Prashar said that the simple solution for UEFA and its president, if they truly believe in international law, national law and the promotion of peace, would be to suspend Israel’s membership of the organization.
Abed Ayoub, national executive director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, said UEFA cannot claim to promote peace through football while shielding a country that fields five teams in occupied Palestinian territory, and is responsible for the genocide of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.
“For decades, Israel’s human rights abuses have been thoroughly documented, yet UEFA continues to carve out an exception that no other nation enjoys,” he said.
“The actions of a government always carry consequences for its citizens; that rule applies to every country except Israel. Enough is enough. UEFA must remove Israel from the league or accept the consequences of protecting impunity.
“In this dark moment in history, accountability is the only path forward.”