King Charles given military honors on first day of Australia tour

People look at projections of photographs of Britain's King Charles III and Queen Camilla as they are displayed on the Sydney Opera House on October 18, 2024, as the royals arrive for a six-day visit to Sydney and Canberra. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 October 2024
Follow

King Charles given military honors on first day of Australia tour

SYDNEY: King Charles was granted five-star rank in each branch of Australia’s armed forces Saturday, a ceremonial gesture to mark the first full day of his landmark tour Down Under.
Charles, in addition to being king of realm can now call himself field marshal of Australia’s army, marshal of its airforce and admiral of the fleet.
It was not a bad day’s work for the 75-year-old monarch, who spent Saturday recuperating and without public engagements after a marathon flight from London to Sydney.
The monarch — who received the life-changing cancer diagnosis just eight months ago — and Queen Camilla have begun a nine-day visit to Australia and Samoa, the first major foreign tour since being crowned.
They landed in Sydney on Friday and were greeted by local dignitaries and posy-bearing children, before a quick private meeting with Australia’s staunchly republican Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his fiancee.
“We are really looking forward to returning to this beautiful country to celebrate the extraordinarily rich cultures and communities that make it so special,” the royal couple said in a social media post ahead of their arrival.
Royal tours to far-flung domains are a vital way of kindling local support for the monarchy, and the political stakes for the royals are high.
A recent poll showed about a third of Australians would like to ditch the monarchy, a third would keep it, and a third are ambivalent.
Visiting British royals have typically embarked on weeks-long visits to stoke support, hosting grand banquets and parading through streets packed with thrilled, flag-waving subjects.
This visit will be a little different. The king’s health has caused much of the usual pomp and ceremony to be scaled back.
A planned stop in New Zealand was canceled altogether, and he will be in Sydney and Canberra for just six days before attending a Commonwealth summit in Samoa.
There are few early morning or late night engagements on his schedule and aside from a community barbecue in Sydney and an event at the city’s famed Opera House, there will be few mass public gatherings.
There had been rumors that he may attend a horse race in Sydney on Saturday, but he was not to be seen.
When the time came the well-hydrated crowd belted out Australia’s anthem “Advance Australia Fair” rather than the royal anthem “God Save the King.”

Land Down Under
It is not just age, jetlag and health worries that the king has to contend with Down Under.
Australians, while marginally in favor of the monarchy, are far from the enthusiastic loyalists they were in 2011 when thousands flocked to catch a white-gloved wave from his mother Queen Elizabeth II.
“I think most people see him as a good king,” said 62-year-old Sydney solicitor Clare Cory, who like many is “on the fence” about the monarchy’s continued role in Australian life.
“It’s a long time. Most of my ancestors came from England, I think we do owe something there,” she said, before adding that multi-cultural Australia is now more entwined with the Asia-Pacific than a place “on the other side of the world.”
Some are less charitable, seeing no reason to retain a king whose accent, formal get-up and customs have little to do with the daily lives of easygoing antipodeans.
“He just gives old white guy vibes,” said home school teacher Maree Parker. “We don’t need a king and queen, we can just do our own thing.”
Still, Australia is a land of many happy memories for Charles, and he can be sure to find some support.
He first visited as a gawky 17-year-old in 1966, when he was shipped away to the secluded alpine Timbertop school in regional Victoria.
“While I was here I had the Pommy bits bashed off me,” he would later remark, describing it as “by far the best part” of his education.
Bachelor Charles was famously ambushed by a bikini-clad model on a later jaunt to Western Australia, who pecked him on the cheek in an instantly iconic photo of the young prince.


Bangladesh halts controversial relocation of Rohingya refugees to remote island

Updated 29 December 2025
Follow

Bangladesh halts controversial relocation of Rohingya refugees to remote island

  • Administration of ousted PM Sheikh Hasina spent about $350m on the project
  • Rohingya refuse to move to island and 10,000 have fled, top refugee official says

DHAKA: When Bangladesh launched a multi-million-dollar project to relocate Rohingya refugees to a remote island, it promised a better life. Five years on, the controversial plan has stalled, as authorities find it is unsustainable and refugees flee back to overcrowded mainland camps.

The Bhasan Char island emerged naturally from river sediments some 20 years ago. It lies in the Bay of Bengal, over 60 km from Bangladesh’s mainland.

Never inhabited, the 40 sq. km area was developed to accommodate 100,000 Rohingya refugees from the cramped camps of the coastal Cox’s Bazar district.

Relocation to the island started in early December 2020, despite protests from the UN and humanitarian organizations, which warned that it was vulnerable to cyclones and flooding, and that its isolation restricted access to emergency services.

Over 1,600 people were then moved to Bhasan Char by the Bangladesh Navy, followed by another 1,800 the same month. During 25 such transfers, more than 38,000 refugees were resettled on the island by October 2024.

The relocation project was spearheaded by the government of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who was ousted last year. The new administration has since suspended it indefinitely.

“The Bangladesh government will not conduct any further relocation of the Rohingya to Bhasan Char island. The main reason is that the country’s present government considers the project not viable,” Mizanur Rahman, refugee relief and repatriation commissioner in Cox’s Bazar, told Arab News on Sunday.

The government’s decision was prompted by data from UN agencies, which showed that operations on Bhasan Char involved 30 percent higher costs compared with the mainland camps in Cox’s Bazar, Rahman said.

“On the other hand, the Rohingya are not voluntarily coming forward for relocation to the island. Many of those previously relocated have fled ... Around 29,000 are currently living on the island, while about 10,000 have returned to Cox’s Bazar on their own.”

A mostly Muslim ethnic minority, the Rohingya have lived for centuries in Myanmar’s western Rakhine state but were stripped of their citizenship in the 1980s and have faced systemic persecution ever since.

In 2017 alone, some 750,000 of them crossed to neighboring Bangladesh, fleeing a deadly crackdown by Myanmar’s military. Today, about 1.3 million of them shelter in 33 camps in the coastal Cox’s Bazar district, making it the world’s largest refugee settlement.

Bhasan Char, where the Bangladeshi government spent an estimated $350 million to construct concrete residential buildings, cyclone shelters, roads, freshwater systems, and other infrastructure, offered better living conditions than the squalid camps.

But there was no regular transport service to the island, its inhabitants were not allowed to travel freely, and livelihood opportunities were few and dependent on aid coming from the mainland.

Rahman said: “Considering all aspects, we can say that Rohingya relocation to Bhasan Char is currently halted. Following the fall of Sheikh Hasina’s regime, only one batch of Rohingya was relocated to the island.

“The relocation was conducted with government funding, but the government is no longer allowing any funds for this purpose.”

“The Bangladeshi government has spent around $350 million on it from its own funds ... It seems the project has not turned out to be successful.”