Pakistani students force closure of Lahore college campus amid protests over rape reports

Police personnel stand guard outside a college as students protest to condemn the alleged rape of a female student by a security guard inside the premises of the college, in Lahore on October 14, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 14 October 2024
Follow

Pakistani students force closure of Lahore college campus amid protests over rape reports

  • Police said no victim had come forward to file a complaint and the college dismissed the allegations as ‘false’
  • Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari urges people to share if they had confirmed information about incident

ISLAMABAD: Hundreds of students on Monday staged protests over a reported rape of a student at a college in the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore and forced closure of one of the campuses, with police and provincial government officials denying the incident.
The incident was first reported on social media over the weekend, with varying accounts stating the rape took place on Thursday or Friday evening in the basement of a Punjab College for Women campus.
However, the police on Monday said no victim had come forward to file a complaint and the college dismissed the allegations as “false.”
“The records of all the CCTV cameras in the campus have been checked,” Faisal Kamran, a senior Lahore police official, said at a press conference. “Till now, we are unable to verify the incident.”
“The alleged victim has not been identified as yet,” he said, adding the police had also checked hospital records.
The Punjab College for Women said in a post on Instagram that no such incident had been reported to police and false information was being spread online.
The police, however, took a security guard into custody who was identified online.
“The accused guard has been in custody since yesterday, but no girl or incident has been reported yet,” Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari said on X.
“If anyone has any confirmed information about this incident, please share.”
— With additional input from AFP


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 57 min 11 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.