NICOSIA: Cyprus has fully activated a mechanism to allow third-country nationals evacuating the Middle East safe passage through the island as the crisis in the region worsens, government officials said on Wednesday.
One country has sought Cyprus’s assistance for the evacuation of civilians, and Cypriot authorities had offered facilities to nine other countries in assisting smaller groups of people to leave, Foreign Minister Constantinos Kombos said. He did not identify the countries.
Kombos said that while airports in the region remained functional, use of the Cypriot facility might be unnecessary.
“If, as a result of yesterday’s developments, airports in the region shut, the (evacuation) plan comes into play,” Kombos said after a meeting of the island’s national security council, top advisers to the government on security issues.
He was referring to Tuesday’s missile attack by Iran on Israel, which had previously launched a barrage of attacks against the Iran-backed Hezbollah group in Lebanon, decimating its senior command.
Close to 60,000 people from Lebanon were evacuated through Cyprus in 2006, during the last large-scale conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. The island is the closest European Union member state to Lebanon, about 40 minutes by air and 10 hours away by boat. Some individuals from Lebanon have already started arriving on the island on private yachts, Cypriot officials said.
![]()
Cyprus on standby to assist evacuations from Middle East
Short Url
https://arab.news/pjb9g
Cyprus on standby to assist evacuations from Middle East
- One country has sought Cyprus’s assistance for the evacuation of civilians
- Cypriot authorities had offered facilities to nine other countries in assisting smaller groups of people to leave
UN experts slam Israeli ‘terrorist’ death penalty bill
GENEVA: United Nations experts on Wednesday called on Israel to withdraw a bill proposing the mandatory death penalty for terrorist acts, warning it would violate the right to life and discriminate against Palestinians.
Israel’s parliament last November passed a first reading of a draft amendment to the country’s penal code, demanded by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir.
“Mandatory death sentences are contrary to the right to life,” a dozen independent UN rights experts warned in a statement.
“By removing judicial and prosecutorial discretion, they prevent a court from considering the individual circumstances, including mitigating factors, and from imposing a proportionate sentence that fits the crime,” they said.
While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country: the last person to be executed was the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann in 1962.
But the amendment, which must pass a second and third reading before becoming law, would change that and would introduce two tracks for the death penalty in Israel, a dozen independent UN rights experts warned in a statement.
In the occupied West Bank, the statement said “the death penalty would be imposed by military courts under military law for terrorist acts causing the death of a person, even if not intended.”
In Israel and occupied East Jerusalem, meanwhile, capital punishment would continue to be applied only under Israeli criminal law and only for the “intentional killing of Israeli citizens or residents.”
‘Vague and overbroad’
The experts’ statement warned that under both tracks, “vague and overbroad definitions of terrorist offenses under Israeli law would apply, which can include conduct that is not genuinely terrorist, and the death penalty would be mandatory.”
The experts, including Francesca Albanese, the special rapporteur for the rights situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, stressed that unintentional killings were not considered among the “most serious” crimes to which the death penalty can be applied under international law.
“Since Israeli military trials of civilians typically do not meet fair trial standards under international human rights law and humanitarian law, any resulting death sentence would further violate the right to life,” said the experts, who also included the special rapporteurs for protecting rights while countering terrorism and for extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.
“Denial of a fair trial is also a war crime,” they stressed.
The independent experts, who are mandated by the UN Human Rights Council but who do not speak on behalf of the United Nations, also warned that “the bill makes matters worse by allowing death sentences to be imposed by a simple majority vote of military judges.”
Hamas said in November that the proposed law “embodies the ugly fascist face of the rogue Zionist occupation and represents a blatant violation of international law.”
The Ramallah-based Palestinian foreign ministry called it a “new form of escalating Israeli extremism and criminality against the Palestinian people.”
Israel’s parliament last November passed a first reading of a draft amendment to the country’s penal code, demanded by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir.
“Mandatory death sentences are contrary to the right to life,” a dozen independent UN rights experts warned in a statement.
“By removing judicial and prosecutorial discretion, they prevent a court from considering the individual circumstances, including mitigating factors, and from imposing a proportionate sentence that fits the crime,” they said.
While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country: the last person to be executed was the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann in 1962.
But the amendment, which must pass a second and third reading before becoming law, would change that and would introduce two tracks for the death penalty in Israel, a dozen independent UN rights experts warned in a statement.
In the occupied West Bank, the statement said “the death penalty would be imposed by military courts under military law for terrorist acts causing the death of a person, even if not intended.”
In Israel and occupied East Jerusalem, meanwhile, capital punishment would continue to be applied only under Israeli criminal law and only for the “intentional killing of Israeli citizens or residents.”
‘Vague and overbroad’
The experts’ statement warned that under both tracks, “vague and overbroad definitions of terrorist offenses under Israeli law would apply, which can include conduct that is not genuinely terrorist, and the death penalty would be mandatory.”
The experts, including Francesca Albanese, the special rapporteur for the rights situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, stressed that unintentional killings were not considered among the “most serious” crimes to which the death penalty can be applied under international law.
“Since Israeli military trials of civilians typically do not meet fair trial standards under international human rights law and humanitarian law, any resulting death sentence would further violate the right to life,” said the experts, who also included the special rapporteurs for protecting rights while countering terrorism and for extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.
“Denial of a fair trial is also a war crime,” they stressed.
The independent experts, who are mandated by the UN Human Rights Council but who do not speak on behalf of the United Nations, also warned that “the bill makes matters worse by allowing death sentences to be imposed by a simple majority vote of military judges.”
Hamas said in November that the proposed law “embodies the ugly fascist face of the rogue Zionist occupation and represents a blatant violation of international law.”
The Ramallah-based Palestinian foreign ministry called it a “new form of escalating Israeli extremism and criminality against the Palestinian people.”
Latest updates
Recommended
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.