From ‘Sleepy Joe’ to ‘Comrade Kamala,’ Republicans sharpen their tone

Supporters of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump pray at the start of a campaign rally at the Expo World Market Center in Las Vegas, Nevada, on September 13, 2024. (AFP) e
Short Url
Updated 14 September 2024
Follow

From ‘Sleepy Joe’ to ‘Comrade Kamala,’ Republicans sharpen their tone

  • Trump and his surrogates have portrayed Harris as far more radical than Biden, applying the labels “left” and “radical” to her twice as often as they did to him

PARIS: A “Marxist” and a “radical” who wants to “destroy” America: as Democrats rally around the candidacy of Kamala Harris, Republicans have begun employing significantly more negative and aggressive rhetoric than they had against Joe Biden.
An AFP analysis of the language used in nearly 120 hours of televised speeches and remarks by both parties’ candidates and their surrogates, from May 1 to September 1, reveals the strategies Republicans have adopted to undermine the Democratic candidate’s credibility.
After dismissing President Biden as “crooked,” “bad” and “sleepy,” Trump and his supporters now mock Harris as a “border czar,” for what they say is her badly failed work in curbing undocumented migration to the United States.
That nickname has popped up 80 times in rallies — once every 14 times the former California senator’s name is mentioned.
Republicans have repeatedly accused Harris of an “open border” policy, which they say allows “millions of illegal aliens” to flood into the country.
The negative rhetoric is much more prominent now — 30 percent more — than it was against Biden before he dropped out of the race on July 21. Trump supporters appearing on television associate her with negative words like “crime,” “destroy,” “suffer” and “bad.”
At the same time, Democrats have been using much more positive, enthusiastic language since Harris succeeded Biden as the Democrats’ flag-bearer, with words like “freedom,” “joy,” “win” and “care” being used 30 percent more often on talk shows and 70 percent more in rallies.

Trump and his surrogates have portrayed Harris as far more radical than Biden, applying the labels “left” and “radical” to her twice as often as they did to him.
And since July 21, their use of the term “liberal” in describing Harris has exploded — used eight times more in rallies and six times more in talk shows — while adjectives like “socialist” and “Marxist,” rarely applied to Biden, have become commonplace in Republicans’ vocabulary.
In the United States, the “Red Scare” — fear of subversion by far-left elements, including immigrants — hit its peak in the early 1950s. But years after the Cold War ended, any hint of communist sympathies remains anathema among US politicians.
This, presumably, was behind Trump finally settling on “Comrade Kamala” as his favored nickname for his Democratic rival — he has used that term at least 30 times in his rallies.
Through the entirety of Republican remarks analyzed by AFP, “Comrade” and the name of the vice president represent the seventh-most common pairing of words.
The two words most frequently linked, not surprisingly, are “Biden” and “Harris,” as Republicans seek to leverage Biden’s unpopularity — even after he dropped out of the race. The president’s name comes up every five or six times that Harris is mentioned.
By comparison, Democrats are only half as likely to link the names of Biden and their new candidate.
They describe Harris with words including “leader” and “ready” — ready to be president, that is.
Also among the top 20 terms used to describe her are “fight,” “freedom” and “believe” — reflecting the renewed sense of hope that her rapid ascension has brought to many Democrats.
 


Ex-Syrian intelligence officer appears in UK court charged with crimes against humanity

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Ex-Syrian intelligence officer appears in UK court charged with crimes against humanity

LONDON: A former member ‌of Syria's Air Force Intelligence attended a British court hearing via videolink on Tuesday charged with crimes against humanity and torture relating to the suppression of pro-democracy demonstrations ​in Damascus in 2011.
Salem Michel Al-Salem, 58, who now lives in Britain, appeared virtually at the hearing at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court from his home. He was wearing a breathing apparatus mask and the court was told he suffered from degenerative motor neurone disease.
Al-Salem is charged with three counts of murder as a crime against humanity relating to deaths in April and July 2011 "as part of ‌a widespread or ‌systematic attack against a civilian population with ​knowledge ‌of ⁠the attack".
He ​is ⁠also accused of three charges of torture relating to incidents in 2011 and 2012, and one of conduct ancillary to murder as a crime against humanity. He did not speak during the hearing and there was no indication as to how he would plead.
His lawyer Sean Caulfield told the court that Al-Salem was too unwell to confirm his ⁠name.
The seven charges were brought under a British ‌law that allows the prosecution of serious ‌international crimes committed abroad. The Crown Prosecution ​Service said it was the ‌first time it had brought charges of murder as crimes against ‌humanity.
In 2005, Afghan warlord Faryadi Zardad was convicted by a British court of torture that had taken place in Afghanistan.
Al-Salem, who has sought indefinite leave to remain in Britain, was a colonel in the Syrian Air Force ‌Intelligence department with oversight of the Information Branch in the district of Jobar, to the east of ⁠central Damascus, British prosecutors ⁠say.
He is accused of leading a group tasked with quelling the demonstrations, which mostly occurred during Friday afternoon prayers. Prosecutors say he gave his men orders to open fire on protesters, which led to the deaths of some individuals.
Prosecutors say he was also present at, or took part in, the torture of men at the Information Branch building.
Al-Salem was first arrested in central England in December 2021. His lawyer had sought an order to withhold his name, arguing it could pose a risk to his safety. England's ​Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring rejected the ​application but ordered that his address not be made public.
He will next appear on Friday at London's Old Bailey court.