UK risks ‘tearing open’ US ties with Israel arms embargo: Trump adviser

File photo of Israel's F-35 Lightning II fighter (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 30 August 2024
Follow

UK risks ‘tearing open’ US ties with Israel arms embargo: Trump adviser

  • ‘Special relationship’ could suffer ‘serious rift,’ endanger Britain’s role in F-35 program: Robert O’Brien
  • UK must ‘take every step necessary’ to shut down ICC investigation into Israeli PM, defense minister

London: The UK risks damaging its relationship with Washington over a potential ban on weapons sales to Israel, a senior adviser to Donald Trump has warned.

The former US president’s last national security adviser, Robert O’Brien, said an arms ban on Israel by the UK government would also endanger Britain’s role in the F-35 jet program, The Guardian reported.

O’Brien, who is now a key voice on national security in the Trump election campaign, made the remarks at an event hosted by the Policy Exchange think tank.

He also urged the UK to avoid damaging the “special relationship” with the US by “taking every step necessary” to shut down the International Criminal Court investigation into Israel’s leadership.

The F-35 is the result of a multinational program that includes the UK as a partner and Israel as a sales customer.

Parts of the jet are produced by British arms companies, and Israel has used the aircraft in its devastation of Gaza.

The UK government is deciding whether to suspend arms export licenses to Israel over fears that British systems may have been used by the Israel Defense Forces to breach international humanitarian law.

“There is a potential there for a serious rift, whether it is a Harris or Trump administration, between the UK and the US, and I would tread very carefully,” O’Brien said.

“The F-35 is a joint project and it is going to continue to go to Israel no matter what Turkiye, the UK or any other country has to do with it.

“You would hate to see a situation where the UK is no longer a partner in the F-35 project or other advanced platforms because of a very ill-advised arms embargo on Israel.

“The consequences of an arms embargo on Israel is something the UK really needs to think about at a time when Russia and China are posing a massive threat to the West. A lot of high-tech on which the UK relies comes directly or indirectly via Israel.”

O’Brien also attacked Britain’s stance on the ICC probe, which he accused of being highly selective.

Under former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, the UK objected to the court’s issuing of arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

But under the current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the objections were dropped in late July.

O’Brien accused the court of being “an impediment to peace in the region,” adding: “For the ICC to go after Israeli leaders is a joke … the UK should take every step necessary to shut it down.”

If the UK moves ahead with an arms embargo on Israel, British firms may face difficulty in selling products in the US, O’Brien said.

Washington would “certainly” launch congressional action instituting a counter-embargo on major UK weapons firms, including BAE Systems, he added.

“It (the arms embargo) is an extraordinarily dangerous policy proposal and has the potential to tear open the special relationship and really hurt the Western alliance and NATO.”


Russia awaits an answer from the US on New START as nuclear treaty ticks down

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Russia awaits an answer from the US on New START as nuclear treaty ticks down

  • Russian leader Vladimir Putin has proposed keeping the treaty’s limits
  • US President Donald Trump has said Putin’s proposal sounded ‘like a good idea’
MOSCOW: Russia on Wednesday said it was still awaiting a formal answer from Washington on President Vladimir Putin’s proposal to jointly stick to the last remaining Russian-US arms control treaty, which expires in less than two months.
New START, which runs out on February 5, caps the number of strategic nuclear warheads that the United States and Russia can deploy, and the deployment of land- and submarine-based missiles and bombers to deliver them.
Putin in September offered to voluntarily maintain for one year the limits on deployed strategic nuclear weapons set out in the treaty, whose initials stand for the (New) Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.
Trump said in October it sounded “like a good idea.”
“We have less than 100 days left before the expiry of New START,” said Sergei Shoigu, the secretary of Russia’s powerful Security Council, which is like a modern-day politburo of Russia’s most powerful officials.
“We are waiting for a response,” Shoigu told reporters during a visit to Hanoi. He added that Moscow’s proposal was an opportunity to halt the “destructive movement” that currently existed in nuclear arms control.
Nuclear arms control in peril
Russia and the US together have more than 10,000 nuclear warheads, or 87 percent of the global inventory of nuclear weapons. China is the world’s third largest nuclear power with about 600 warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists.
The arms control treaties between Moscow and Washington were born out of fear of nuclear war after the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. Greater transparency about the opponent’s arsenal was intended to reduce the scope for misunderstanding and slow the arms race.
US and Russia eye China’s nuclear arsenal
Now, with all major nuclear powers seeking to modernize their arsenals, and Russia and the West at strategic loggerheads for over a decade — not least over the enlargement of NATO and Moscow’s war in Ukraine — the treaties have almost all crumbled away. Each side blames the other.
In the new US National Security Strategy, the Trump administration says it wants to reestablish strategic stability with Russia” — shorthand for reopening discussions on strategic nuclear arms control.
Rose Gottemoeller, who was chief US negotiator for New START, said in an article for The Arms Control Association this month that it would be beneficial for Washington to implement the treaty along with Moscow.
“For the United States, the benefit of this move would be buying more time to decide what to do about the ongoing Chinese buildup without having to worry simultaneously about new Russian deployments,” Gottemoeller said.