Case filed against protesters attempting to storm Pakistan Supreme Court over blasphemy ruling

A general view of the Pakistan's Supreme Court is pictured in Islamabad on April 6, 2022. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 21 August 2024
Follow

Case filed against protesters attempting to storm Pakistan Supreme Court over blasphemy ruling

  • Protests against chief justice have been ongoing since February when he granted bail to a blasphemy suspect 
  • Blasphemy is a sensitive subject in Muslim-majority Pakistan where a mere accusation can lead to lynchings

ISLAMABAD: Police on Wednesday filed a case against over 6,000 protesters who had entered the federal capital’s sensitive Red Zone and tried to storm the Supreme Court earlier this week over a ruling in a blasphemy case heard by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa. 

In February this year, hundreds of supporters of religious outfits rallied to protest against what they said were blasphemous remarks by CJ Isa in a case against a member of the minority Ahmadi community who has been accused of blasphemy for distributing Islamic literature and been in jail for 13 months. Following the protests, the Supreme Court had released a statement calling the “impression” of blasphemy by Isa “absolutely wrong” and rejecting the “vicious campaign” against him.

On Monday, angry protesters, under the banner of the religious organization, the Aalmi Majlis Tahaffuz-i-Nabuwat, clashed with police after barging into Islamabad’s Red Zone, home to sensitive government buildings such as the Presidency, Prime Minister House, Parliament and the Supreme Court. 

“At around 3:35 p.m. [on Monday], miscreants coming from three sides under the leadership of Qazi Abdul Rasheed started assembling at Express Chowk,” a copy of the police complaint registered by Islamabad Police and seen by Arab News said. 

“They were about 5,000 to 6,000 and armed with weapons and batons,” the report said, adding that Safe City cameras would be used to identify the suspects. 

The complaint said Islamabad’s administration and police officials informed protesters that rallies were the capital under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which bars gatherings of more than four people in the interest of public safety. However, the demonstrators blocked three main roads leading to the Red Zone, namely Ataturk Avenue, Jinnah Avenue, and Embassy Road, and set up a stage at Express Chowk, from where they delivered inflammatory speeches through loudspeakers, demanding the chief justice’s resignation.

The police report said authorities tried to peacefully stop protesters from marching toward the Supreme Court building but they advanced forward after attacking police officials and damaging the entry gate to the D-Chowk square as well as cameras, streetlights and police vehicles. Protesters also snatched anti-riot kits from police officials along with a 12-bore gun and beat and injured some officials. 

“They continued to spread hatred and incitement, whose purpose was to spread fear and terror in the judiciary, including the higher judiciary, by interpreting religion by themselves and using religion to achieve their nefarious purposes,” the complaint said, adding that the group was stopped at the National Assembly gate from where it later dispersed. 

The police report said a case had been filed against the protesters under the country’s Anti-Terrorism Act and various sections of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) for charges ranging from terrorism, robbery, rioting with deadly weapons and obstructing public servants from discharging their duties.

Human rights groups say Pakistan’s harsh blasphemy laws are often misused to settle personal scores, and mere accusations have led to violence and mob justice in the past.

Pakistan’s government last month warned the Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) religio-political party, which had led the February protests against the chief justice, against spreading hate on the basis of religion after a TLP leader announced a reward of Rs1,00,00,000 [$345,736] for anyone who would kill the top judge. 


‘Look ahead or look up?’: Pakistan’s police face new challenge as militants take to drone warfare

Updated 14 January 2026
Follow

‘Look ahead or look up?’: Pakistan’s police face new challenge as militants take to drone warfare

  • Officials say militants are using weapons and equipment left behind after allied forces withdrew from Afghanistan
  • Police in northwest Pakistan say electronic jammers have helped repel more than 300 drone attacks since mid-2025

BANNU, Pakistan: On a quiet morning last July, Constable Hazrat Ali had just finished his prayers at the Miryan police station in Pakistan’s volatile northwest when the shouting began.

His colleagues in Bannu district spotted a small speck in the sky. Before Ali could take cover, an explosion tore through the compound behind him. It was not a mortar or a suicide vest, but an improvised explosive dropped from a drone.

“Now should we look ahead or look up [to sky]?” said Ali, who was wounded again in a second drone strike during an operation against militants last month. He still carries shrapnel scars on his back, hand and foot, physical reminders of how the battlefield has shifted upward.

For police in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province, the fight against militancy has become a three-dimensional conflict. Pakistani officials say armed groups, including the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), are increasingly deploying commercial drones modified to drop explosives, alongside other weapons they say were acquired after the US military withdrawal from neighboring Afghanistan.

Security analysts say the trend mirrors a wider global pattern, where low-cost, commercially available drones are being repurposed by non-state actors from the Middle East to Eastern Europe, challenging traditional policing and counterinsurgency tactics.

The escalation comes as militant violence has surged across Pakistan. Islamabad-based Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies (PICSS) reported a 73 percent rise in combat-related deaths in 2025, with fatalities climbing to 3,387 from 1,950 a year earlier. Militants have increasingly shifted operations from northern tribal belts to southern KP districts such as Bannu, Lakki Marwat and Dera Ismail Khan.

“Bannu is an important town of southern KP, and we are feeling the heat,” said Sajjad Khan, the region’s police chief. “There has been an enormous increase in the number of incidents of terrorism… It is a mix of local militants and Afghan militants.”

In 2025 alone, Bannu police recorded 134 attacks on stations, checkpoints and personnel. At least 27 police officers were killed, while authorities say 53 militants died in the clashes. Many assaults involved coordinated, multi-pronged attacks using heavy weapons.

Drones have also added a new layer of danger. What began as reconnaissance tools have been weaponized with improvised devices that rely on gravity rather than guidance systems.

“Earlier, they used to drop [explosives] in bottles. After that, they started cutting pipes for this purpose,” said Jamshed Khan, head of the regional bomb disposal unit. “Now we have encountered a new type: a pistol hand grenade.”

When dropped from above, he explained, a metal pin ignites the charge on impact.

Deputy Superintendent of Police Raza Khan, who narrowly survived a drone strike during construction at a checkpoint, described devices packed with nails, bullets and metal fragments.

“They attach a shuttlecock-like piece on top. When they drop it from a height, its direction remains straight toward the ground,” he said.

TARGETING CIVILIANS

Officials say militants’ rapid adoption of drone technology has been fueled by access to equipment on informal markets, while police procurement remains slower.

“It is easy for militants to get such things,” Sajjad Khan said. “And for us, I mean, we have to go through certain process and procedures as per rules.”

That imbalance began to shift in mid-2025, when authorities deployed electronic anti-drone systems in the region. Before that, officers relied on snipers or improvised nets strung over police compounds.

“Initially, when we did not have that anti-drone system, their strikes were effective,” the police chief said, adding that more than 300 attempted drone attacks have since been repelled or electronically disrupted. “That was a decisive moment.”

Police say militants have also targeted civilians, killing nine people in drone attacks this year, often in communities accused of cooperating with authorities. Several police stations suffered structural damage.

Bannu’s location as a gateway between Pakistan and Afghanistan has made it a security flashpoint since colonial times. But officials say the aerial dimension of the conflict has placed unprecedented strain on local forces.

For constables like Hazrat Ali, new technology offers some protection, but resolve remains central.

“Nowadays, they have ammunition and all kinds of the most modern weapons. They also have large drones,” he said. “When we fight them, we fight with our courage and determination.”