Draft law approved seeking to ‘frustrate’ Pakistan court ruling on extra seats for Khan’s party

People stand outside the Parliament house during a budget session in Islamabad on June 26, 2024. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 31 July 2024
Follow

Draft law approved seeking to ‘frustrate’ Pakistan court ruling on extra seats for Khan’s party

  • Proposed legislation says amendments to Elections Act 2017 will take precedence over court orders
  • Pakistan’s top court this month ruled that ex-PM Khan’s party was eligible for reserved seats

ISLAMABAD: A Pakistani parliamentary panel on Wednesday approved a bill suggesting that a political party should not be allocated reserved seats for women and minorities if it failed to submit its list of candidates for those seats within the prescribed time, a move being seen widely as an attempt by the government to hold on to its two-thirds majority in parliament. 
Pakistan’s top court this month delivered a landmark verdict saying the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party of jailed former prime minister Imran Khan was eligible for reserved seats in parliament, mounting pressure on the fragile ruling coalition of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. His government stands to lose its two-thirds majority in parliament after the ruling. 
In Pakistan, parties are allocated 70 reserved seats — 60 for women, 10 for non-Muslims — in proportion to the number of seats won in general elections. This completes the National Assembly’s total 336 seats. A simple majority in Pakistan’s parliament is 169 out of 336 seats.
All candidates from Khan’s PTI party were forced to contest the February polls as independents after the party was stripped of its election symbol of the cricket bat by the country’s election regulator on the technical grounds that it did not hold intra-party elections, a prerequisite for any party to take part in polls. After the election, the PTI-backed candidates were forced to join the Sunni Ittehad Council, or SIC party, to claim a share of 70 reserved seats as independents are not eligible for the extra seats.
“The government wants to frustrate the Supreme Court judgment through this legislation but practically it will be of no effect,” Imran Shafique, a legal expert, told Arab News. “The Supreme Court has determined rights of the political parties as per existing laws which cannot be undone through a simple parliamentary legislation.”
Bilal Azhar Kayani, a lawmaker of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party, tabled the bill in parliament on Tuesday. The bill includes a declaration that proposed amendments to the Elections Act 2017 would take precedence over court orders, including those of the Supreme Court.
The Parliamentary Affairs Committee approved the bill with a majority of 8-4 votes. The bill will now be presented in the National Assembly and Senate where it will be voted on. 
The draft law says that individuals who contested the general election as independent candidates cannot change their affidavit at a later stage to declare their affiliation with any political party.
“The amendment aims to provide clarity in the law according to the true spirit of the constitution,” Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar told the committee.
The bill also states that any political party that fails to submit its list of reserved seats within the timeline defined by the election regulator shall “not be eligible for the quota in the reserved seats at a later stage.”
Shafique alleged that the draft bill was not a public interest legislation but was instead passed by the committee to serve the interests of certain political parties in parliament. 
“The Supreme Court can strike down this law if challenged and also its retrospective application is not possible,” he explained. 
Shafique said the government could gain time through this legislation and delay the process of allocating reserved seats to the PTI in the national and provincial assemblies. 
“The government may try to get political mileage from the law but it cannot stop the allocation of reserved seats to the PTI as per the top court’s ruling,” he added.