IMF deal will improve Pakistan’s funding prospects — Moody’s

An exterior view of the building of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), with the IMG logo, is seen on March 27, 2020 in Washington, DC. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 17 July 2024
Follow

IMF deal will improve Pakistan’s funding prospects — Moody’s

  • Rating agency says government’s ability to sustain reform implementation will be key to continually unlocking financing
  • Capping talks that started in May, Pakistan and IMF reached bailout deal for $7 billion, 37-month loan program last week

ISLAMABAD: Rating agency Moody’s has said this week a new $7 billion bailout deal with the International Monetary Fund would improve funding for Pakistan from bilateral and multilateral partners but the ability to sustain reforms would be key to easing liquidity risks.

Pakistan and the IMF reached an agreement for a $7 billion, 37-month loan program last week, capping negotiations that started in May after Islamabad completed a short-term, $3 billion program that helped stabilize the economy, avert a sovereign debt default, and set challenging revenue targets in its budget to get IMF approval.

In a comment regarding the new IMF deal, Moody’s said, “the new IMF program will improve Pakistan’s (Caa3 stable) funding prospects.

“The program will provide credible sources of financing from the IMF and catalyze funding from other bilateral and multilateral partners to meet Pakistan’s external financing needs.”

However, the agency cautioned that the government’s ability to sustain reform implementation would be key to allowing Pakistan to continually unlock financing over the duration of the IMF program, leading to a durable easing of government liquidity risks.

The new IMF bailout deal comes with conditions of far-reaching reforms, such as measures to broaden the tax base and remove exemptions and make timely adjustments of energy enterprises’ management and privatization, phasing out agricultural support prices and associated subsidies, advancing anti-corruption, governance and transparency reforms, and gradually liberalizing trade policy.

A resurgence of social tensions on the back of high cost of living – which may increase because of higher taxes and future adjustments to energy tariffs – could weigh on reform implementation, Moody’s said. Moreover, risks that the coalition government may not have a sufficiently strong electoral mandate to continually implement difficult reforms remain, the rating agency said in the comment.

According to an IMF report published in May, Pakistan’s external financing needs are about $21 billion for fiscal 2025 (ending June 2025) and about $23 billion for fiscal 2026-27. The Moody’s agency said Pakistan’s external position remained fragile, with high external financing requirements over the next three to five years.

The country is vulnerable to policy slippages, it said, adding that weak governance and high social tensions can compound the government’s ability to advance reforms, jeopardizing its ability to complete reviews under the IMF program and unlock external financing.


Pakistan calls for new global cricket body, says ICC ‘hostage to Indian politics’

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan calls for new global cricket body, says ICC ‘hostage to Indian politics’

  • Pakistan’s government has barred its team from playing against India in World Cup fixture on Feb.15
  • India generates largest share of cricket’s commercial revenue, enjoying overarching influence in the sport

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif called for a new global cricket governing body on Tuesday, saying that the International Cricket Council (ICC) has become hostage to Indian political interests amid a fresh row between the neighbors ahead of the T20 World Cup 2026. 

Pakistan’s government announced earlier this week that it has cleared its national men’s team to play the upcoming World Cup, scheduled to be held in India and Sri Lanka from Feb. 7. However, Islamabad said the national team will boycott its upcoming fixture against India on Feb. 15 without mentioning a reason. The ICC responded by saying that Pakistan’s decision was “not in the interest of the global game or the welfare of fans worldwide, including millions in Pakistan.”

Pakistan’s dispute with the ICC can be traced back to it expressing displeasure recently at the cricket body’s decision to replace Bangladesh with Scotland for the World Cup. Bangladesh had requested the global governing body shift its matches to any another venue outside India owing to security concerns, as political tensions surge Delhi and Dhaka surge. 

“A new international organization of cricket is needed to keep the spirit of the gentleman’s game alive,” Asif wrote on social media platform X. “ICC has become hostage to Indian political interests in South Asia.”

India generates the largest share of cricket’s commercial revenue and hence enjoys overarching influence over the sport. Critics argue that this financial contribution translates into decisive leverage within the ICC. 

A large part of that revenue comes from the Indian Premier League (IPL), the sport’s most lucrative T20 cricket competition, which is run by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Between 2024 and 2027, the IPL is projected to earn $1.15 billion, nearly 39 percent of the ICC’s total annual revenue, according to international media reports. 

The ICC is headed by Jay Shah, the son of Indian Home Minister Amit Shah. The ICC chair is expected to be independent from any cricket board and hence take impartial decisions.

India and Pakistan engaged in a military confrontation that lasted for four days in May last year before Washington brokered a ceasefire. Militaries of the two countries pounded each other with drones, missiles, fighter jets and exchanged artillery fire in what was the worst fighting between them since 1999. 

These bilateral tensions have made their way to cricket, with India refusing to shake hands with Pakistani cricketers during the September 2025 Asia Cup tournament between both sides. The two teams met for three matches, all of which India won, and did not shake hands before or after the fixtures. 

The two countries have not played a full bilateral series since 2012–13 due to political tensions. They meet largely at neutral venues.