Pakistan’s top court to hear from Wednesday case on spy agencies’ meddling in judiciary

A man walks past the Pakistan's Supreme Court building in Islamabad, Pakistan, on January 12, 2024. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 01 April 2024
Follow

Pakistan’s top court to hear from Wednesday case on spy agencies’ meddling in judiciary

  • Six Islamabad High Court judges have accused ISI of interference, intimidation over judicial decisions and cases
  • Retired chief justice appointed to head government-led inquiry commission recuses himself from responsibility 

ISLAMABAD: The chief justice of Pakistan on Monday constituted a seven-member bench to start hearings from Wednesday in a case involving allegations by six Islamabad High Court judges of interference and intimidation by the country’s powerful intelligence agencies in judicial decisions, the court roster showed. 

In a letter addressed to the Supreme Judicial Council watchdog last week, six judges accused the military’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI), the country’s main spy agency, of intimidating and coercing them over legal cases.

The judges provided various examples of alleged interference, including a case concerning Pakistan’s imprisoned former prime minister Imran Khan. The letter also mentioned incidents where the judges said their relatives were abducted and tortured and their homes were secretly surveilled, aiming to coerce them into delivering favorable judgments in specific cases.

“Court roster for Wednesday 3rd April 2024 in the matter of letter dated 25 March 2024 of the six judges of the Islamabad High Court,” the notice said, naming the seven-member bench headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa. 

Others on the panel are Justices Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Yahya Afridi, Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Athar Minallah, Musarrat Hilali and Naeem Akhtar Afghan.

Last Thursday, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chief Justice Isa met to discuss the matter and nominated ex-chief justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani to head a government inquiry commission.

But on Monday, in a letter to Sharif seen by Arab News, Jillani recused himself from the commission and said the matter should be probed by the Supreme Judicial Council or the Supreme Court itself. 

On Sunday, over 300 lawyers had urged the Supreme Court to take suo motu notice of the allegations leveled by the IHC judges, saying a government-headed commission would lack the power to hold an independent inquiry.

In the past, Imran Khan’s main opponent, PM Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), had also accused the ISI of intimidating court decisions, including those that led to convictions of his elder brother Nawaz Sharif after his ouster from the prime minister’s office in 2017.

The powerful army plays an oversized role in making and breaking governments in Pakistan. The country has been ruled by military regimes for almost half its history since independence from Britain in 1947. Khan and the elder Sharif both have alleged that they were ousted by the military after they fell out with the generals.

The army denies it interferes in political matters. It has so far refrained from commenting on the judges’ letter. 


Pakistan urges equal application of international law, flags Indus treaty at UN debate

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan urges equal application of international law, flags Indus treaty at UN debate

  • Pakistani envoy says silence over violations of international law are fueling conflicts from South Asia to Gaza
  • He urges the UN secretary-general to use the Charter’s preventive tools more proactively to help avert conflicts

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s UN ambassador on Monday called for equal application of international law in resolving global conflicts, warning that India’s decision to hold the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance and the unresolved dispute over Kashmir continued to threaten stability in South Asia.

Speaking at an open debate of the UN Security Council on “Leadership for Peace,” Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad said selective enforcement of international law and silence in the face of violations were fueling conflicts worldwide, undermining confidence in multilateral institutions.

His remarks come months after a brief but intense military escalation between India and Pakistan in May, following a gun attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir. India blamed the attack on Pakistan, a charge Islamabad denied while calling for a transparent international probe.

The attack triggered a military standoff between the two South Asian nuclear neighbors and prompted New Delhi to suspend the World Bank-brokered Indus Waters Treaty, a move Pakistan says has no basis in international law and has described as “an act of war.”

“India’s unilateral suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty — a rare and enduring example of successful diplomacy — is yet another blatant breach of international obligations that undermines regional stability and endangers the lives and livelihoods of millions,” Ahmad told the council.

He said Jammu and Kashmir remained one of the oldest unresolved disputes on the Security Council’s agenda and required a just settlement in line with UN resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people, a position India has long rejected.

Ahmad broadened his remarks to global conflicts, citing Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan and other crises, and said peace could not be sustained through “selective application of international law” or by sidelining the United Nations when violations occur.

The Pakistani envoy also referred to the Pact for the Future, a political declaration adopted by UN member states this year aimed at strengthening multilateral cooperation, accelerating progress toward the 2030 development goals and reforming global governance institutions.

While welcoming the pact, Ahmad warned that words alone would not deliver peace, pointing to widening development financing gaps, rising debt distress and climate shocks that he said were reversing development gains across much of the Global South.

He called for a stronger and more proactive role for the UN Secretary-General, including earlier use of preventive tools under the UN Charter, and urged the Security Council to demonstrate credibility through consistency, conflict prevention and greater respect for international court rulings.

“No nation can secure peace alone,” Ahmad said. “It is a collective endeavor, requiring leadership, cooperation and genuine multilateralism.”