Second place in Illinois adopts Gaza ceasefire resolution

Downtown Bolingbrook at The Promenade.
Short Url
Updated 15 February 2024
Follow

Second place in Illinois adopts Gaza ceasefire resolution

  • It was unanimously approved in a vote by the board of trustees of Bolingbrook, a village in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago
  • ‘Our thoughts are with all those affected by the conflict and we remain committed to supporting peace and justice in the region,’ says Egyptian American Mary Alexander-Basta, the village mayor

CHICAGO: The board of trustees of Bolingbrook, a village in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago, has adopted a resolution calling for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza.

The mayor of Bolingbrook, which with a population of 73,755 is the 16th-largest population center in Illinois, is Egyptian American Mary Alexander-Basta, who has held the office since August 2020.

She said the resolution, unanimously approved on Tuesday, is a statement rejecting all of the violence, including the Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas on Israel and the continuing Israeli military assault on Gaza that followed.

“As the Mayor of Bolingbrook, I wholeheartedly embrace the richness of our community’s diversity,” Alexander-Basta added. “It is our greatest strength, fostering innovation, understanding and unity among all residents.

“Embracing diversity ensures that every voice is heard and every individual is valued, creating a vibrant and inclusive community where everyone can thrive.

“It is imperative that humanitarian aid reaches those in need and that efforts to rebuild infrastructure are prioritized to restore stability and hope for the future. Our thoughts are with all those affected by the conflict and we remain committed to supporting peace and justice in the region.”

The resolution “condemns all violence” and states: “The mayor and board of trustees of the village of Bolingbrook stand for peace and call for the return of hostages and prisoners.”

It advocates “a durable, sustained humanitarian cessation of hostilities, the rebuilding of civilians’ lives, and refostering economic development,” as well as “a lasting, permanent and viable peace coupled with dignity and respect for Israelis, Palestinians and every ethnic and religious group involved in the current conflict.”

The resolution, which is advisory only and not legally binding, was unanimously approved by the village board in a vote on Tuesday night. The respectful discussion during the Bolingbrook meeting contrasted sharply with the antagonism that ceasefire proponents have faced elsewhere in Chicago and other cities in Illinois, an overwhelmingly Democrat state.

The Chicago City Council, for example, approved a resolution on Jan. 31 following a contentious meeting. After a month of political wrangling and opposition from pro-Israel elected officials, it narrowly passed by a vote of 24 to 23.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who expressed sympathy for all victims of the violence, was forced to cast the deciding vote for the resolution, which also called for the “immediate and unconditional release” of all Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

A similar resolution presented on Feb. 5 to the village board of Orland Park, also in southwestern suburbs of Chicago, prompted a verbal assault by Mayor Keith Pekau against the large Arab and Muslim population of the village.

After a group of about 75 homeowners presented the mayor with a petition signed by 800 residents, he launched into a lengthy diatribe during which he questioned their “patriotism.” Having anticipated the delivery of the petition, he read a lengthy speech that was dismissive of Palestinian human rights. He also requested that 10 police officers be present at the meeting, more than normal, resulting in what some attendees described as a “hostile” and “intimidating” environment.

After condemning the actions of the residents and taxpayers, Pekau called a recess, ordered those observing it to leave and, after the room was cleared, he continued to deliver his speech, in which he told Arab and Muslim residents they could “go to another country” if they did not like the way the conduct of village officials.

“Mayor Pekau’s actions were very disrespectful,” said Shad Mohammed, who attended the meeting.

The mayor’s actions prompted some members of the community to hold meetings about challenging his campaign for reelection in April 2025, and to launch a voter-registration drive.

Image credit: Wikipedia


China protests over Philippine coast guard’s Xi images

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

China protests over Philippine coast guard’s Xi images

MANILA: The Chinese Embassy in Manila said Friday it has filed a diplomatic protest against a Philippine Coast Guard spokesman over a social media post that included cartoonish images of President Xi Jinping.
Coast Guard spokesman Jay Tarriela and an embassy official had been trading barbs since last week over issues concerning the disputed South China Sea.
The crucial waterway, which Beijing claims historic rights to despite an international ruling that its assertion has no legal basis, has been the site of repeated clashes between Chinese and Philippine vessels.
Tarriela’s Facebook post on Wednesday included a photo of him giving a speech, with a background featuring a compilation of comical images of Xi under the banner “Why China remains to be bully?“
On Friday, the embassy slammed the post for “attacking and smearing Chinese leaders” in a statement it released.
The move “constitutes a serious violation of China’s political dignity,” the embassy said adding that it is a “blatant political provocation, which has crossed the red line.”
The embassy expressed “strong indignation” to the presidential palace, foreign affairs department and coast guard demanding an explanation for Tarriela’s “malicious provocations.”
In response, Tarriela Friday branded the protest “an attempt to deflect from the core issue: China’s repeated aggressive and illegal actions in the West Philippine Sea,” using the Filipino term for the waters immediately west of the country.
“If the Chinese Embassy objects to images or expressions that highlight these violations — often through legitimate public discourse or even satire — it only underscores discomfort with the truth being exposed,” Tarriela said, calling the response an “effort to intimidate.”
Manila’s presidential palace and Department of Foreign Affairs have yet to answer AFP’s request for comment.