Former Israeli soldier teaches Japanese the reality of the conflict in Gaza

Dani Nehushtai, a former soldier in the Israeli Air Force, became a conscientious objector and now devotes his life to pacifism in Japan, teaching people the reality of the situation in Israel and the region. (ANJ)
Short Url
Updated 30 January 2024
Follow

Former Israeli soldier teaches Japanese the reality of the conflict in Gaza

  • Dani Nehushtai, who wanted to become a pilot, spoke in the Nerima district of Tokyo on Sunday under the banner “Peace Cannot Be Obtained Through Force”
  • After the ICJ condemned Israel for risking genocide against the Palestinians, he welcomed the decision and denounced the massacre of 26,000 Palestinians

TOKYO: Dani Nehushtai, a former soldier in the Israeli Air Force, became a conscientious objector and now devotes his life to pacifism in Japan, teaching people the reality of the situation in Israel and the region.
As Gaza suffers daily bombings by Israel, Nehushtai, who wanted to become a pilot, spoke in the Nerima district of Tokyo on Sunday under the banner “Peace Cannot Be Obtained Through Force.”
He spoke about his relationship with the army and his commitment to becoming a “Top Gun” pilot, but he realized that, as a military man, he would have no choice if ordered to bomb buildings with families in them. So, he gave up becoming a pilot in the Air Force.
Now he is a peace activist and a craftsman manufacturing wooden furniture in Saitama, just north of Tokyo.
He also writes books in Japanese on his pacifist and environmentalist commitments and since 2008 has given lectures, following the bombing by Israel of a building and tunnel complex run by Hamas.
It is estimated around 1,300 civilians and soldiers died in the operation.
After the International Court of Justice condemned Israel on Friday for risking genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, the former military man welcomed the decision and denounced the massacre of 26,000 Palestinians, including nearly 10,000 children. He said none of this was justified, despite the attack by Hamas that killed 1,200 Israelis on October 7.
Concerning the international anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp, he told Arab News that Israelis are not particularly interested in this day and that other anniversaries exist to celebrate the memory of the Holocaust.
Nehushtai condemned the Hamas massacre and told his audience that the Palestinians wanted their land and their freedom. He added that the families of the Israeli hostages held by Hamas wanted the release of their loved ones, but the Israeli government believed that destroying Hamas through a massive bombing campaign was the more important target.
For him, the renunciation of war is possible. As proof, he cited the agreements signed at Camp David between Egyptian President Anwar el Sadat, Israeli Prime Minister Menahem Begin and American President Jimmy Carter that enabled the 1978 peace agreements stipulating the withdrawal from the Occupied Territories.
The three leaders received the Nobel Peace Prize and Nehushtai said the Camp David Agreement means there is hope that peace is possible even with former fratricidal enemies.
The activist, who experienced Gaza without a wall and without a security barrier in his youth, said that there used to be Israeli-Palestinian friendship movements, but they were suppressed by the Israeli government. After the attack on October 7, the peace movements, and buds of friendship between Jews and Palestinians were weakened.
The recognition of Dani Nehushtai’s action for peace was welcomed by several Japanese politicians from different political parties who are committed to the defense of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution that renounces war.
 


Trump takes unconventional approach to communicating to the public about war in Iran

Updated 03 March 2026
Follow

Trump takes unconventional approach to communicating to the public about war in Iran

  • The communications strategy opened Trump to criticism that he hadn’t done enough to explain the rationale and objectives of the war

Typical of an unconventional presidency, the Trump administration waited more than 48 hours to make any live, public communication to the American people about why it had decided to go to war with Iran.
President Donald Trump discussed why he launched the attack prior to a White House ceremony honoring military heroes on Monday but took no questions from reporters. Earlier in the day, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine briefed journalists at the Pentagon.
The two days previous, Trump delivered two pretaped statements that were released on Truth Social, the social media site owned by the president’s media company, and granted telephone interviews to more than a dozen journalists — several of which produced fragmented responses that, to some, clouded as much as they cleared up.
The communications strategy opened Trump to criticism that he hadn’t done enough to explain the rationale and objectives of the war, even as the American military suffered its first casualties. By contrast, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has teamed with the US against Iran, delivered two statements the day the war began and addressed reporters Monday at the site of a missile attack that killed nine people. The Israeli military has held multiple press briefings each day.
“The American people need a commander in chief, and he has been absent in that role,” Rahm Emanuel, White House chief of staff under President Barack Obama, said on CNN Monday. Emanuel, a Democrat, is contemplating a run for the presidency in 2028.
An unconventional strategy leads to criticism
Peter Baker, chief White House correspondent for The New York Times, wrote on social media that “after Trump launched a new war on Iran, he did not rush back to the White House to make an Oval Office address to rally the nation as other presidents have done. He stayed at Mar-a-Lago to attend a glitzy political fundraiser.”
That post provoked a response from Steven Cheung, White House communications director. “Imagine being a reporter so consumed with Trump Derangement Syndrome that he wants President Trump to mimic the failed policies of the past. The truth is that President Trump spent the majority of his time monitoring the situation in a secure facility, in constant contact with world leaders, and made multiple addresses to the nation that garnered hundreds of millions of views. He also took dozens of calls with reporters.”
The calls included one with Baker’s colleague at The Times, Zolan Kanno-Youngs. Trump’s mobile phone number is known to many of the reporters who cover him, and the president often takes their calls for on-the-spot interviews. Besides The Times, he spoke in the aftermath of the attack to journalists for ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, CNBC, Fox News Channel, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, Axios, Politico and an Israeli television station.
Most of the calls were brief and marginally illuminating; Politico’s Dasha Burns said Trump answered but said he was too busy to talk. The public couldn’t hear what Trump said in the interviews and was dependent upon what the journalists chose to report on the conversations.
“I spoke to President Trump today and he told me that the operation in Iran is going to go very fast,” Libby Alon, a reporter for Channel 14 News in Israel, wrote about her interview on X. “It’s doing very well, and (will) make the people of Israel very happy, and the people of the world very happy.”
The Times reported that in its six-minute chat, Trump “offered several seemingly contradictory visions of how power might be transferred to a new government — or even whether the existing Iranian power structure would run that government or be overthrown.”
In one of his two conversations with Trump, ABC News’ Jonathan Karl said when he asked about the death of Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the president said: “I got him before he got me. They tried twice. Well I got him first.” CNN’s Jake Tapper went on the air minutes after his conversation Monday, saying Trump told him “the big one is coming soon,” an apparent reference to a future attack.
Asked for comment, White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: “President Trump is the most transparent and accessible president in American history. The American people have never had a more direct and authentic relationship with a president of the United States than they have with President Trump.”
Hegseth briefing concentrates on friendly reporters
Pentagon reporters learned late Sunday about Hegseth’s briefing. Reporters from The Associated Press, Reuters, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News Channel and Stars & Stripes were permitted into the briefing room, but Hegseth did not call on them. Instead, he took questions from NewsNation and Trump-friendly outlets like the Daily Caller, Daily Wire, One America News and the Christian Broadcasting Network. Most mainstream news outlets left their regular stations at the Pentagon last fall rather than agree to Hegseth’s rules restricting their work.
Hegseth denounced the “foolishness” of people wanting to know details of the operation in advance, such as whether Americans would commit to more than air power, and said the operation would continue as long as it took to achieve objections. He initially ignored NBC News’ Courtney Kube when she called out a question: “President Trump put a four-week time limit on it. Are you saying he’s wrong?”
Later, Hegseth denounced Kube for asking “the typical NBC sort of gotcha-type question. President Trump has all the latitude in the world to talk about how long it might take — four weeks, two weeks, six weeks, it could move up, it could move back. We’re going to execute at his command the objectives he set out to achieve.”
Unlike Pentagon briefings in past administrations, reporters were given assigned seats, with the Trump-friendly outlets seated in front. Jennifer Griffin, Hegseth’s former colleague at Fox News Channel who left the Pentagon with other reporters after not accepting his new rules, was seated in the last row.