The Oslo Accords are now dead, says an architect of deal

Palestinian boys walk amid the destruction caused by Israeli strikes in the village of Khuzaa, east of Khan Younis, on Monday. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 27 November 2023
Follow

The Oslo Accords are now dead, says an architect of deal

  • Norwegian peace worker Jan Egeland: International mediation is the only viable way out of the conflict

OSLO: The Oslo Accords, which aimed to bring “peaceful coexistence” to Israel and the Palestinians, are now dead, one of the deal’s architects, said Norwegian peace worker Jan Egeland.

The agreement produced the iconic image of Palestinian President Yasser Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin shaking hands Sept. 13, 1993, on the White House lawn as President Bill Clinton watched.

It was the start of a delicate process: Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization mutually recognized each other and created Palestinian self-government for an interim period of five years.

The aim was to give the two sides enough time to iron out several key issues, such as the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, and the fate of Palestinian refugees — a process that struggled to make headway.

Now, 30 years later, with a new bloody war raging between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, Egeland was asked by AFP whether the accords were “pretty much dead.”

“Absolutely,” he said in an interview in his office in the Norwegian capital.

“The Oslo Accords are gone as an accord. Now, there will be another accord, and it will have to be led by the US, the EU, and the Arab countries.”

The accords were the culmination of 14 rounds of secret talks in Oslo, initiated and organized by, among others, Egeland, who was, at the time, a state secretary in the Foreign Ministry.

International mediation is the only viable way out of the conflict for the 66-year-old former diplomat who now heads the Norwegian Refugee Council humanitarian organization.

“It’s not possible for Israel and Hamas to negotiate the future of these lands (alone). There will be zero trust,” he said.

“Israel has waged (war) to destroy Hamas. Hamas is there to eliminate Israel.”

He said the “leaderships on either side are not at all at the level they were at the time of the Oslo Accords.”

Egeland said: “Those were visionary leaders, they were strong leaders, really leaders. Now we have populists on both sides.”

Pictures hanging on the wall behind Egeland show him shaking hands with Arafat and US President George Herbert Walker Bush. 

The current conflict erupted on Oct. 7 when Hamas fighters broke through Gaza’s militarized border in an attack Israeli officials said killed about 1,200 people.

Israel’s retaliatory strikes alongside a ground offensive have killed about 15,000 people.

“After this, there will be so much bitterness and hatred on both sides that there will be more violence,” Egeland said.

“It’s an illusion that Israel can bomb itself to security and peace.

“It is an illusion that by killing Israeli civilians, as (Hamas) did massively, and taking civilians as hostages (that) you can solve the problem of Israel existing.”

But the international community is not up to the task, he lamented.


Democrats outpace Republicans in fundraising for key US House races

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Democrats outpace Republicans in fundraising for key US House races

  • Democratic strategists say House Republicans are more focused on preserving ‌their small majority than expanding it, prioritizing member retention over candidate recruitment

WASHINGTON: Democratic candidates so far have outraised Republican hopefuls in the most ​competitive districts for the US House of Representatives with crucial mid-term elections nine months away, according to a Reuters analysis of campaign finance reports.
Incumbents in battleground districts, regardless of party, have a clear edge over their challengers, hauling in more than $84 million last year, according to federal reports released in January.
But a Reuters review of disclosures in 30 of the most competitive districts where incumbents are seeking reelection found that Republican challengers have struggled to raise money from donors when compared to Democratic challengers taking on Republican ‌incumbents.
Forty-two Republican candidates ‌in 16 Democratic-held districts last year collected some $20 million, ​about $465,000 each, ‌while ⁠54 ​Democratic candidates ⁠in 14 Republican-held districts hauled in around $50 million, nearly $918,000 each.
Republicans hold a narrow 218-214 majority in the House. The party that controls the White House historically suffers losses in midterm elections, and Democrats would only need to flip a handful of seats in November to gain control of the chamber for the final two years of Donald Trump’s presidency.
Democrats have a fundraising edge in each of the three battleground districts in which there is ⁠no incumbent seeking reelection.
The reports show the financial picture of campaigns ‌in the districts that will likely determine control ‌of the House heading into the primary election season, which ​begins March 3 with votes in Texas, ‌North Carolina and Arkansas.
Democratic strategists say House Republicans are more focused on preserving ‌their small majority than expanding it, prioritizing member retention over candidate recruitment.
“Given the fact that Republicans have claimed for the last year that they’re on offense, one could be shocked to learn how weak their recruitment has been this cycle,” said Katarina Flicker, a spokesperson for the Democratic ‌super PAC House Majority PAC. “In competitive, Democratic-held seats across the country, Republicans are struggling to field credible candidates.”

REPUBLICANS CLAIM ADVANTAGE AMONG INCUMBENTS
Mike ⁠Marinella, a spokesperson ⁠for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said GOP incumbents as a whole “are absolutely dominating Democrats” in fundraising and on issues voters care about.
“It says a lot about the national Democrats’ desperation when they have to cherry-pick scraps of data to convince themselves they’re competing,” Marinella said.
At least 31 House Republicans will vacate their seats early next year after retiring or seeking higher office. The DCCC, House Democrats’ campaign arm, is targeting six of those seats, though only three are expected by political analysts to be competitive.
Control of the House and Senate will be determined by races in nearly three dozen districts and eight key states, respectively. The Republicans have a 53-47 edge in the Senate.
Other ​factors — such as the mid-decade redraw ​of congressional districts in several states and spending by political committees, national parties and super PACs — could play a significant role in the outcome of November’s congressional elections.