Pakistan's Imran Khan’s public hearings in state secrets case adjourned until Nov. 28

Former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, center, arrives to the Islamabad High Court surrounded by journalists and security in Islamabad, Pakistan, on September 8, 2022. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 23 November 2023
Follow

Pakistan's Imran Khan’s public hearings in state secrets case adjourned until Nov. 28

  • The trial was being held in prison away from cameras before Pakistan court declared it illegal
  • The government has accused Khan of leaking official secrets and using them for political gains

ISLAMABAD: Public hearings in a case in which former Prime Minister Imran Khan is accused of leaking state secrets began today, Thursday, at the Judicial Complex in Islamabad, but was adjourned until Nov. 28, his party said, with the court directing the ex-premier to appear in person on that date.

The government had passed an order on Aug. 29 that the case would be heard in prison due to “security concerns.” A special court had since been conducting the trial in jail, with no members of the public or media allowed, until Tuesday when the Islamabad High Court declared the prison trial illegal.

The saga relates to an alleged diplomatic correspondence between Washington and Islamabad that Khan says was proof that his ouster as PM in a parliamentary vote of no-confidence in April 2022 was part of a US conspiracy to remove him. Washington has repeatedly denied Khan’s accusations.

The government has since accused Khan of leaking state secrets and using them for political gains. A special court was formed on Aug. 21 under the Official Secrets Act, 1923, to adjudicate the case through in-camera proceedings. Khan and his close aide, former Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, were indicted in the case last month.

"Special Court Judge Abul Hasanat Muhammad Zulqarnain conducted the hearing and requested a copy of the [Islamabad] High Court decision [declaring jail trial illegal], which his staff promptly provided. The hearing was brief and adjourned until next Tuesday, November 28," Qureshi's lawyer Ali Bukhari told Arab News, adding that the court had summoned Khan and Qureshi in person on that date. 

Khan’s lawyers had opposed the government’s decision to hold a jail trial over concerns the ex-PM would not get a fair trial behind closed doors. Last month, the PTI also took the matter to the Islamabad High Court where its plea was turned down by Chief Justice Aamir Farooq who said there was apparently no malice behind the government’s decision to hold the jail trial.

Khan’s legal team then filed an intra-court appeal against the decision which led the Islamabad High Court to issue a stay order against the prison trial on Tuesday.

The order declared all proceedings of the trial conducted since Aug. 29 as void.

"The proceedings and the trial conducted in jail premises in a manner that cannot be termed as an open trial stand vitiated," said the court order, adding that jail trial orders by the government did not fulfil legal requirements:

“In exceptional circumstances, and where it is conducive to justice, a trial can be conducted in jail in a manner that fulfils the requirement of an open trial or a trial in camera provided it is in accordance with the procedure provided by law.”

The ruling meant the prosecution would have to restart the trial, either in open court or in jail after fulfilling those legal requirements.

Last week, the Pakistan government also approved Khan’s jail trial in a separate case of a £190 million settlement with a property tycoon.

Khan is currently being held at Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail where he is serving a three-year jail sentence in a case in which he was convicted in August for not declaring assets earned from the sale of state gifts while he was PM.


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 57 min 11 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.