Lives of 36 babies at Gaza hospital hang in the balance despite Israeli incubator offer

This photo released by Dr. Marawan Abu Saada shows prematurely born Palestinian babies in Shifa Hospital in Gaza City on Nov. 12, 2023. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 14 November 2023
Follow

Lives of 36 babies at Gaza hospital hang in the balance despite Israeli incubator offer

  • Al Shifa Hospital medical staff say no clear mechanism to move babies despite Israeli offer to supply incubators for evacuation
  • Three of the original 39 premature babies have already died since Gaza’s biggest hospital ran out of fuel at the weekend

GAZA/JERUSALEM: The lives of 36 babies at Gaza’s Al Shifa Hospital were hanging in the balance on Tuesday, according to medical staff there who said there was no clear mechanism to move them despite an Israeli effort to supply incubators for an evacuation.
Three of the original 39 premature babies have already died since Gaza’s biggest hospital ran out of fuel at the weekend to power generators that had kept their incubators going.
The Gaza Strip has been under a total Israeli blockade since Hamas launched an attack on Israel on Oct. 7. An Israeli ground incursion since then has brought fighting to streets around the hospital in the center of Gaza City in the north of the strip.
The 36 babies, who weigh less than 1.5 kg (3.3 pounds) and with some as small as 700 to 800 grams, were now lying side-by-side on ordinary beds, exposing them to infection and without any individual adjustments to humidity levels and temperatures, staff said.
“Luckily they are still 36, we didn’t lose any of them overnight,” Dr. Ahmed El Mokhatallali, a surgeon, told Reuters by telephone from Al Shifa. “But still the risks are really high ... We have still the risk of losing them.”
Israel’s military said earlier on Tuesday it was coordinating the transfer of incubators into the Gaza Strip in a step to allow the evacuation of the babies. It posted on social media an image of a soldier unloading incubators from a van.
The military also posted a video showing Shani Sasson, a spokesperson from an Israeli Defense Ministry liaison office that deals with Palestinian civilian affairs, standing in front of incubators and saying a formal offer of help had been made.
“Extensive efforts are underway to ensure that these incubators right here behind me can reach the babies in Gaza without delay,” she said in the video.
An Israeli official involved in those efforts, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said three available incubators had been provided by Israeli hospitals.
“The intention is to enable the safe evacuation of newborn babies. To our understanding, Shifa does not have the necessary transport incubators for that,” the official said, adding the incubators were on standby outside Gaza for any agreed handover.
Images published by the military showed standard transport incubators, said Arthur Edelman, a professor of paediatrics and neonatology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
“They are battery-operated, which would allow for a couple of hours of running time. They also have the option of plugging into an ambulance power source,” he said.

‘NO CLEAR MECHANISM’
The military did not say what steps it would take to make an evacuation possible, amid intense air strikes and ongoing fighting in the vicinity of Al Shifa hospital.
A spokesman for Gaza’s health ministry, which is under Hamas control, said there was no objection to evacuating the babies but said there was no mechanism to do this.
Many of Gaza’s hospitals, like Al Shifa, have also shut down because of a lack of fuel and supplies, or are already crammed full of patients and those wounded in the fighting.
“We have no objection to have the babies moved to any hospital, in Egypt, the West Bank or even to the occupation (Israeli) hospitals. What we care most is about the wellbeing and the lives of those babies,” Gaza health ministry spokesperson Ashraf Al-Qidra said, speaking by telephone from the hospital. “So far there is no clear mechanism.”
Israel says the hospital is not under siege and says its forces offers exit routes to those inside. Medical staff and officials in the hospital say those trying to leave have come under fire. Reuters could not independently verify the accounts.
Al Shifa’s Mokhatallali said he was aware of efforts to rescue the babies but did not know the details.
“Someone asked us to get the names of the babies and how many there are. But no actual steps on the ground. So we don’t know how serious these efforts are to evacuate these babies,” he said.
The Israeli military posted an audio recording of what it said was a conversation between a senior officer from Israel’s Coordination and Liaison Administration and the director-general of Al Shifa Hospital, speaking in Arabic, subtitled in English.
In it, the official talks about depositing an incubator at the hospital gate, without giving details of how or when that would happen. The director-general says that would help, adding that four respirators for children are also needed.
The official says he will see what he can do to help. The director-general responds that all the wards and staff inside the hospital need help.
Israel has vowed to wipe out Hamas after the group’s fighters rampaged through southern Israel on Oct. 7, killing 1,200 people and taking around 240 hostage, according to Israeli numbers. Its counteroffensive has killed more than 11,000 people in Gaza so far.


Second US aircraft carrier is being sent to the Middle East, AP source says

Updated 57 min 57 sec ago
Follow

Second US aircraft carrier is being sent to the Middle East, AP source says

  • Move by the USS Gerald R. Ford, first reported by The New York Times, will put two carriers and their accompanying warships in the region
  • Trump told Axios earlier this week that he was considering sending a second carrier strike group to the Middle East

WASHINGTON: The world’s largest aircraft carrier has been ordered to sail from the Caribbean Sea to the Middle East, a person familiar with the plans said Thursday, as US President Donald Trump considers whether to take possible military action against Iran.
The move by the USS Gerald R. Ford, first reported by The New York Times, will put two carriers and their accompanying warships in the region as Trump increases pressure on Iran to make a deal over its nuclear program. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss military movements.
The USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and three guided-missile destroyers arrived in the Middle East more than two weeks ago.
It marks a quick turnaround for the USS Ford, which Trump sent from the Mediterranean Sea to the Caribbean last October as the administration build up a huge military presence in the leadup to the surprise raid last month that captured then-Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
It also appears to be at odds with Trump’s national security strategy, which put an emphasis on the Western Hemisphere over other parts of the world.
Trump on Thursday warned Iran that failure to reach a deal with his administration would be “very traumatic.” Iran and the United States held indirect talks in Oman last week.
“I guess over the next month, something like that,” Trump said in response to a question about his timeline for striking a deal with Iran on its nuclear program. “It should happen quickly. They should agree very quickly.”
Trump told Axios earlier this week that he was considering sending a second carrier strike group to the Middle East.
Trump held lengthy talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday and said he insisted to Israel’s leader that negotiations with Iran needed to continue. Netanyahu is urging the administration to press Tehran to scale back its ballistic missile program and end its support for militant groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah as part of any deal.
The USS Ford set out on deployment in late June 2025, which means the crew will have been deployed for eight months in two weeks time. While it is unclear how long the ship will remain in the Middle East, the move sets the crew up for an usually long deployment.
The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.