Wallace confirms resignation as UK defense minister in letter to PM Sunak

Ben Wallace ended four years in the post that saw him supervise the military response to the war in Ukraine. (File/AP)
Short Url
Updated 31 August 2023
Follow

Wallace confirms resignation as UK defense minister in letter to PM Sunak

  • Grant Shapps replaces Ben Wallace as UK defence minister
  • Ben Wallace helped lead Britain’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

LONDON: Ben Wallace confirmed his resignation as defense minister on Thursday in a letter to Rishi Sunak, offering the government his continued support while warning the British prime minister not to see defense as a “discretionary spend.”
Wallace, who helped lead Britain’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, said last month he wanted to step down after four years in the role and would quit as a lawmaker at the next national election to pursue new opportunities.

He was replaced by ex-energy secretary Grant Shapps as the new defense minister, the fifth government job for him over the last year, after serving in four different ministries - transport, interior affairs, business and then at energy and net zero.
Seen as a strong advocate for increased spending on the armed forces, Wallace had hoped to be a potential successor to NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg but the former Norwegian prime minister’s contract was extended by another year.
The departure of the popular Wallace saddened some in the governing Conservative Party, but the move was unlikely to change London’s support for Ukraine.
In his official resignation letter, Wallace renewed his appeal for the government not to turn to defense to make spending cuts.
“The Ministry of Defense is back on the path to being once again world class with world class people,” he wrote.
“I know you agree with me that we must not return to the days where defense was viewed as a discretionary spend by government and savings were achieved by hollowing out.”
He posted on X, formerly known as Twitter: “That’s all folks. Been a privilege to serve this great nation.”
Sunak praised Wallace for his work, saying in a letter in response: “You have served our country in three of the most demanding posts in government: defense secretary, security minister and Northern Ireland minister.”
“I fully understand your desire to step down after eight years of exacting ministerial duties.”
A former captain in the British army, Wallace, 53, was appointed as defense minister in 2019 by his friend and ally, former Prime Minister Boris Johnson after holding junior ministerial roles in earlier governments.
Wallace, alongside Johnson, soon became an ardent supporter of Ukraine after Russia launched its full-scale invasion last year, cajoling other nations to help supply the requests for weapons from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
But his frustration with not getting the NATO general secretary post earlier this year bubbled over at the military alliance’s summit last month, when he said Ukraine needed to show gratitude and not treat its allies like “Amazon.”
He later said in Ukrainian on Twitter that his comments “were somewhat misrepresented” and he instead wanted to emphasize that London’s relationship with Kyiv was not transactional but more of a partnership.


Trump raises the possibility of a ‘friendly takeover of Cuba’ coming out of talks with Havana

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Trump raises the possibility of a ‘friendly takeover of Cuba’ coming out of talks with Havana

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said Friday that the US is in talks with Havana and raised the possibility of a “friendly takeover of Cuba” without offering any details on what he meant.
Speaking to reporters outside the White House as he left for a trip to Texas, Trump said Secretary of State Marco Rubio was in discussions with Cuban leaders “at a very high level.”
“The Cuban government is talking with us,” the president said. “They have no money. They have no anything right now. But they’re talking to us, and maybe we’ll have a friendly takeover of Cuba.”
He added: “We could very well end up having a friendly takeover of Cuba.”
Trump didn’t clarify his comments but seemed to indicate that the situation with Cuba, a communist-run island that has been among Washington’s bitterest adversaries for decades, was coming to a critical point. The White House did not respond to requests for more information Friday.
The president also said that Cuba “is, to put it mildly, a failed nation” and “they want our help.”
His remarks came two days after the Cuban government reported that a Florida-registered speedboat carrying 10 armed Cubans from the US opened fire on soldiers off the island’s north coast. Four of the armed Cubans were killed, and six were injured in responding gunfire, according to Cuba’s government. One Cuban official also was injured.
Cuba has been on Trump’s mind since at least early January, after US forces ousted one of Havana’s closest allies, Venezuela’s socialist President Nicolás Maduro. Trump suggested in the aftermath of that raid that military action in Cuba might not be necessary because the island’s economy was weak enough — particularly in the absence of oil shipments from Venezuela that stopped after Maduro was taken into custody — to soon collapse on its own.
“We’ve had a lot of years of dealing with Cuba. I’ve been hearing about Cuba since I’m a little boy. But they’re in big trouble,” he said Friday.
Then, noting the exile community from the island living in the US, Trump said there could be something coming that “I think  very positive for the people that were expelled, or worse, from Cuba and live here.” He did not elaborate.
The US has maintained a strict trade embargo on Cuba since 1962, the year after a failed, CIA-sponsored invasion of the island at the Bay of Pigs. Trump nonetheless indicated earlier this month that talks with Cuban officials were underway.
Cuba’s government confirmed earlier this week that it was communicating with US officials following the shooting of the American boat. Rubio has said the US Department of Homeland Security and Coast Guard are investigating what happened.
An executive order that Trump signed in late January pledged to impose tariffs on countries providing oil to Cuba, threatening to further cripple a country already plagued by a deepening energy crisis, though US authorities have since indicated that oil from Venezuela can be sold to Cuban interests in some cases.
Carlos Fernández de Cossío, Cuba’s deputy foreign minister, posted, then later deleted on Friday that “the US maintains its fuel embargo against Cuba in full force, and its impact as a form of collective punishment is unwavering.”
“Nothing announced in recent days changes this reality,” he wrote on X before the post was removed. “The possibility of conditional sales to the private sector already existed and does not alleviate the impact on the Cuban population.”
Meanwhile, 40-plus US civil society organizations sent a letter to Congress on Friday asking that it “press the Trump administration to reverse its aggressive policy toward Cuba” and saying that efforts to cut oil shipments to the Caribbean island would spark a humanitarian collapse.
Signees included the Alliance of Baptists, ActionAid USA and the Presbyterian Church.
“Policies that deliberately impose hunger and mass hardship on millions of civilians constitute a form of collective punishment, and as such are a grave violation of international humanitarian law,” the letter reads.