Pakistan unhappy with new ICC revenue model, demands clarity

The photo taken on on December 26, 2022 shows chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), Najam Sethi, at National Bank Cricket Arena, Karachi, Pakistan. (Photo courtesy: PCB)
Short Url
Updated 16 May 2023
Follow

Pakistan unhappy with new ICC revenue model, demands clarity

  • According to figures, India would claim 38.5 percent, while England, Australia would pocket 6.89 percent, 6.25 percent 
  • Pakistan stands to earn 5.75 percent of the ICC’s projected earnings, primarily from its media rights sale 

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is unhappy with the proposed new revenue distribution model for international cricket although it accepts that India, the game’s financial engine, should get the biggest share, chairman Najam Sethi told Reuters.

The International Cricket Council (ICC), the game’s global governing body, has proposed a new revenue sharing model for the 2024-27 cycle to be voted on at its next board meeting in June.

According to figures leaked to Cricinfo, India would claim 38.5 percent, while England and Australia would pocket 6.89 percent and 6.25 percent respectively. Pakistan stands to earn 5.75 percent of the ICC’s projected earnings, primarily from its media rights sale.

The 12 full members of the ICC would collectively get 88.81 percent, while the rest would be distributed among its 96 associate members.

“We are insisting that the ICC should tell us how these figures were arrived at,” Sethi told Reuters from London.

“We are not happy with the situation as it stands.

“Come June, when the board is expected to approve the financial model, unless these details are provided to us, we are not going to approve it.”

India generates an estimated 80 percent of ICC revenue and Disney Star shelled out $3 billion last year to acquire the 2024-27 media rights for the Indian market.

Sethi said the PCB had already asked the ICC to explain how its finance and commercial affairs committee, headed by Indian cricket board secretary Jay Shah, determined the share.

Despite the fact that all nations will get more money, Sethi said at least two other test playing nations were not happy with the model and had sought more details.

The ICC, which considered factors such as the performance of a country’s men’s and women’s teams and their contribution to the ICC’s commercial revenue, was not immediately available to comment.

“In principle, India should get more, there is no doubt about that but ... how is this table being developed?” Sethi said.

The proposed revenue split has become a major talking point in world cricket, which is already facing a rapidly altering landscape because of the Indian-driven rise of franchise-based leagues.

Former England captain Mike Atherton, writing in The Times newspaper on Monday, criticized the “flawed” model, which he feared would only deepen the game’s existing inequality.

“If that distribution comes to pass, then the strong will get stronger, the weak weaker (relatively) and international cricket will continue to become less competitive — which is in nobody’s long-term interest,” Atherton wrote.


Pakistan’s president defends ongoing strikes in Afghanistan, urges Kabul to dismantle militants

Updated 02 March 2026
Follow

Pakistan’s president defends ongoing strikes in Afghanistan, urges Kabul to dismantle militants

  • Afghanistan on Thursday launched attacks in retaliation for Pakistani airstrikes the previous Sunday
  • Pakistan’s military says it is only targeting Afghan military installations to avoid civilian casualties

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s president on Monday defended his country’s ongoing military strikes in neighboring Afghanistan, saying Islamabad tried all forms of diplomacy before targeting militants operating from Afghan territory, and called on the Taliban government in Kabul to disarm groups responsible for attacks in Pakistan.

Pakistan earlier said it is in “open war” with Afghanistan, alarming the international community. The border area remains a stronghold for militant organizations including Al-Qaeda and the Daesh (Islamic State) group.

“(The Afghan Taliban) must choose to dismantle the terror groups that survive on conflict and its war economy,” Asif Ali Zardari said during a speech to lawmakers, adding that “no state accepts serial attacks on its soil.”

Afghanistan on Thursday launched attacks in retaliation for Pakistani airstrikes the previous Sunday. Since then, Pakistan has carried out operations along the border, with Information Minister Attaullah Tarar claiming the killing of 435 Afghan forces and the capture of 31 Afghan positions.

Kabul has denied such claims.

In Afghanistan, the deputy government spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat said Pakistan’s military fired mortar shells at a refugee camp in eastern Kunar province, killing three children and injuring three others.

Afghanistan’s defense ministry said Afghan forces carried out strikes targeting a Pakistani military facility near Paktia province, causing “substantial losses and heavy casualties.”

Pakistan’s military did not respond to questions. It has said Pakistan is only targeting Afghan military installations to avoid civilian casualties.

Pakistan has witnessed a surge of violence in recent months and blames it on the outlawed Pakistani Taliban, known as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan or TTP. It operates both inside Pakistan and from Afghan territory.
Islamabad accuses Afghanistan’s Taliban government of providing safe havens for the TTP, which Kabul denies.

The latest cross-border fighting ended a ceasefire brokered by Qatar and Turkiye in October. The two sides failed to reach a permanent agreement during talks in Istanbul.

Zardari reiterated Pakistan’s call for talks, saying, “We have never walked away from dialogue.”

The Pakistani leader again accused Afghanistan of acting as a proxy for India by sheltering militant groups.

“Stop being used by another country as a battlefield for their ambitions,” he said.

Zardari cited a recent report from the United Nations Security Council’s monitoring team that described the presence of militant groups in Afghanistan as an extra-regional threat.