Stress seen as major cause of Indian military fratricides, suicides

In this file photo, taken on February 7, 2018, Pakistani police guard a street in Haripur district. (Photo courtesy: AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 17 April 2023
Follow

Stress seen as major cause of Indian military fratricides, suicides

  • Fratricide, in military parlance, refers to a soldier killing their own colleagues
  • On Monday, police arrested Indian soldier who had killed four of his peers

NEW DELHI: The arrest of an Indian soldier over the killing of four others at a military base has brought into focus the issue of fratricide in the country’s military and paramilitary forces.

Fratricide, in military parlance, refers to a soldier or security personnel killing their own colleagues.

Multiple studies over the last two decades have attributed fratricides and suicides in India’s armed forces to stress and depression.

On Monday, police in the northern border state of Punjab said they had arrested the soldier at Bathinda military base following the killing of four colleagues at the base last week.

The army said the soldier had “confessed to his involvement” in stealing an assault rifle and killing four colleagues, and that “initial investigations indicate that this was apparently due to personal reasons or animosity.”

The Indian army did not respond to a request for comment on the issue of fratricides.

India’s army, navy and airforce have together lost more than 800 personnel to suicide since 2017, the defense ministry said in July 2022.

The Indian military has about 1.4 million active personnel.

According to official data made public in February 2020, the junior defense minister told parliament that there were seven killed in the army between 2016 and 2020, two in the air force and none in the navy during the same period.

The minister said that to prevent such cases the ministry had launched a mental health program in 2009, which focuses on stress management, and those at high risk of combat stress are identified and counselled.

Retired Maj. Gen. A.P. Singh said that the Bathinda incident was not a case of accidental blue-on-blue killing.

“Internal frustration, revenge, fear of getting caught for a misdeed and bad relations between soldiers, are some of the main reasons,” Singh said.

A 2020 study by a serving army officer and published by the United Service Institution of India, reported a “significant increase in stress levels” among army personnel in the last two decades due to operational and non-operational stressors.

“Presently more than half of Indian Army personnel seem to be under severe stress,” it said, adding long exposure to counter insurgency and counter terrorism work was a factor.


US ambassador accuses Poland parliament speaker of insulting Trump

Updated 05 February 2026
Follow

US ambassador accuses Poland parliament speaker of insulting Trump

  • Tom Rose said the decision was made because of speaker Wlodzimierz Czarzasty’s “outrageous and unprovoked insults” against the US leader
  • “We will not permit anyone to harm US-Polish relations, nor disrespect (Trump),” Rose wrote on X

WARSAW: The United States embassy will have “no further dealings” with the speaker of the Polish parliament after claims he insulted President Donald Trump, its ambassador said on Thursday.
Tom Rose said the decision was made because of speaker Wlodzimierz Czarzasty’s “outrageous and unprovoked insults” against the US leader.
“We will not permit anyone to harm US-Polish relations, nor disrespect (Trump), who has done so much for Poland and the Polish people,” Rose wrote on X.
Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk responded the same day, writing on X: “Ambassador Rose, allies should respect, not lecture each other.”
“At least this is how we, here in Poland, understand partnership.”


On Monday, Czarzasty criticized a joint US-Israeli proposal to support Donald Trump’s candidacy for the Nobel Peace Prize.
“I will not support the motion for a Nobel Peace Prize for President Trump, because he doesn’t deserve it,” he told journalists.
Czarzasty said that rather than allying itself more closely with Trump’s White House, Poland should “strengthen existing alliances” such as NATO, the United Nations and the World Health Organization.
He criticized Trump’s leadership, including the imposition of tariffs on European countries, threats to annex Greenland, and, most recently, his claims that NATO allies had stayed “a little off the front lines” during the war in Afghanistan.
He accused Trump of “a breach of the politics of principles and values, often a breach of international law.”
After Rose’s reaction, Czarzasty told local news site Onet: “I maintain my position” on the issue of the peace prize.
“I consistently respect the USA as Poland’s key partner,” he added later on X.
“That is why I regretfully accept the statement by Ambassador Tom Rose, but I will not change my position on these fundamental issues for Polish women and men.”
The speaker heads Poland’s New Left party, which is part of Tusk’s pro-European governing coalition, with which the US ambassador said he has “excellent relations.”
It is currently governing under conservative-nationalist President Karol Nawrocki, a vocal Trump supporter.
In late January, Czarzasty, along with several other high-ranking Polish politicians, denounced Trump’s claim that the United States “never needed” NATO allies.
The parliamentary leader called the claims “scandalous” and said they should be “absolutely condemned.”
Forty-three Polish soldiers and one civil servant died as part of the US-led NATO coalition in Afghanistan.