Amid constitutional tug of war, Pakistan government tables bill to curtail chief justice’s powers

A general view of a parliament session at Pakistan's national assembly in Islamabad on January 12, 2018. (PID/File)
Short Url
Updated 28 March 2023
Follow

Amid constitutional tug of war, Pakistan government tables bill to curtail chief justice’s powers

  • The bill proposes a committee comprising three top judges to first take up all suo motu matters
  • The National Assembly passes resolution urging Supreme Court not to interfere in 'political matters'

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistani government on Tuesday tabled a bill in parliament to curtail powers of the country's top judge to take suo motu notices, constitute benches and to provide the right to appeal to the aggrieved party in suo motu cases.  

The development comes hours after two Supreme Court judges, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, called for revisiting the power of “one-man show” enjoyed by the chief justice. In a dissenting note released on Monday, the two judges called for a collegial system in the top court to ensure transparency and accountability in dispensation of justice.  

Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar tabled the bill, titled Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023, in the National Assembly, suggesting amendments to the existing law. The bill, a copy of which is available with Arab News, says a cause, matter or appeal before the apex court would be heard and disposed of by a bench constituted by a three-member committee, comprising chief justice and two senior most judges. The decisions of the committee shall be made by majority. 

Regarding the apex court’s original jurisdiction, the bill says any matter invoking the use of Article 184 (3) (suo motu) would first be placed before the above-mentioned committee. In suo-motu case, the court itself takes cognizance of a matter and commences proceedings instead of parties bringing a case or controversy to it. 

“If the committee is of the view that a question of public importance with reference to enforcement of any of the fundamental rights... is involved, it shall constitute a bench comprising not less than three judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan which may also include the members of the committee, for adjudication of the matter,” the bill reads.  

The bill grants the right to appeal in suo motu cases with the appeal's fixation before the court within a period not exceeding 14 days.  

Speaking on the floor of parliament, the law minister said the legal fraternity and the general public had been demanding an amendment to the existing law as suo motu notices had been taken on "petty issues" in the past, with no right to appeal to the aggrieved party.  

“In the past, questions were raised on integrity of the Supreme Court due to its suo motu notices as the existing rules allow the chief justice to exercise all these powers,” he said.  

“This bill is allowing intra-court appeal now which was limited to review petition only in the past and its scope was very limited.”  

The law minister said concerns were raised due to the dissenting note of the two judges and the federal cabinet unanimously approved the bill to protect integrity and dignity of the institution.  

Meanwhile, the National Assembly, the lower house of Pakistan parliament, adopted a resolution presented by Information Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb, urging the Supreme Court not to interfere in "political matters" and with authority of the country's election regulator.  

The resolution demanded the top court avoid interference as the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) was an independent institution and mandated under the constitution to hold elections in the country. Elections of all assemblies in the country should be held together for political stability, it added.  

The Supreme Court is presently hearing a petition filed by ex-premier Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party regarding delay in elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) assemblies, which were dissolved in January.  

Speaker National Assembly Raja Pervaiz Ashraf has referred the bill to the law and justice committee of the house for debate and discussion. The National Assembly will take up the bill for a vote after the committee presents its report.   


Two Pakistani men indicted in $10 million Medicare fraud scheme in Chicago

Updated 12 February 2026
Follow

Two Pakistani men indicted in $10 million Medicare fraud scheme in Chicago

  • Prosecutors say defendants billed Medicare and private insurers for nonexistent services
  • Authorities say millions of dollars in proceeds were laundered and transferred to Pakistan

ISLAMABAD: Two Pakistani nationals have been indicted in Chicago for allegedly participating in a $10 million health care fraud scheme that targeted Medicare and private insurers, the US Justice Department said on Thursday.

A federal grand jury charged Burhan Mirza, 31, who resided in Pakistan, and Kashif Iqbal, 48, who lived in Texas, with submitting fraudulent claims for medical services and equipment that were never provided, according to an indictment filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Medicare is the US federal health insurance program primarily serving Americans aged 65 and older, as well as certain younger people with disabilities.

“Rooting out fraud is a priority for this Justice Department, and these defendants allegedly billed millions of dollars from Medicare and laundered the proceeds to Pakistan,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement.

“These alleged criminals stole from a program designed to provide health care benefits to American seniors and the disabled, not line the pockets of foreign fraudsters,” he added. “We will not tolerate these schemes that divert taxpayer dollars to criminals.”

Prosecutors said that in 2023 and 2024, the defendants and their alleged co-conspirators used nominee-owned laboratories and durable medical equipment providers to bill Medicare and private health benefit programs for nonexistent services.

According to the indictment, Mirza obtained identifying information of individuals, providers and insurers without their knowledge and used it to support fraudulent claims submitted on behalf of shell companies. Iqbal was allegedly linked to several durable medical equipment providers that filed false claims and is accused of laundering proceeds and coordinating transfers of funds to Pakistan.

Mirza faces 12 counts of health care fraud and five counts of money laundering. Iqbal is charged with 12 counts of health care fraud, six counts of money laundering and one count of making a false statement to US law enforcement. Arraignments have not yet been scheduled.

Three additional defendants, including an Indian, previously charged in the investigation, have pleaded guilty to federal health care fraud charges and are awaiting sentencing.

An indictment contains allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.