UN migration agency can not meddle in domestic debates, says boss

Antonio Vitorino, head of UN’s migration agency, says that ‘migration has become a highly politicized area, and even a highly polarized area.’ (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 20 March 2023
Follow

UN migration agency can not meddle in domestic debates, says boss

  • Antonio Vitorino is standing for re-election as director general of the United Nations’ International Organization for Migration

GENEVA: The UN’s migration agency should not get itself dragged into domestic policy debates, its chief Antonio Vitorino said, as he seeks a second term leading the organization.
“Migration has become a highly politicized area, and even a highly polarized area,” the 66-year-old former Portuguese deputy prime minister said.
“Some people would like us to be more vocal in some moments of the internal migration debate, but we do not take sides,” he said, noting how the topic is being fiercely debated in countries like Britain, France and the United States.
Vitorino is standing for re-election as director general of the United Nations’ International Organization for Migration.
The vote takes place in mid-May and Vitorino is in the unusual position of being challenged for the job by his American deputy Amy Pope.
The IOM was founded in 1951 to deal with the displacements in Europe following World War II.
But it was only in 2016 that it joined the United Nations fold, and its boss, unlike the chiefs of other UN agencies, does not single out countries for criticism.
Vitorino acknowledged that the organization could communicate better about what it is and what it does.
But he says the IOM must have a balanced approach toward migration and is not set up to praise or criticize countries since it is not there to verify the implementation of an international treaty or agreement, like the better-known UN refugee agency UNHCR or the UN Human Rights office.
Still, he insisted that the IOM knew how to raise its concerns.
“For instance, considering the European Union, we have been claiming for quite some time that there is a need to address the search and rescue needs in the Mediterranean,” he said.
“And we are very pleased with the fact that recently the European Commission has published a document with a strategy for the central Mediterranean that is exactly taking on board our claim.”
A politician and a lawyer, Vitorino was Portugal’s defense minister and deputy PM from 1995 to 1997 in the government of Antonio Guterres, who is now the UN secretary-general.
He was then the European commissioner for justice and home affairs from 1999 to 2004.
Vitorino was elected to the IOM leadership by member states in 2018, becoming only the second non-American to lead the agency in seven decades.
The agency has 175 member states, with the United States followed by the European Union bloc as its main financial contributors.
“All my predecessors for 70 years made two mandates, and I don’t see any reason for a successful first mandate not to be followed by a second mandate,” Vitorino said.
He said he was counting on “very strong support from the European countries” and “strong encouragement” from other nations in other regions.
He declined to comment on being challenged by his deputy, beyond saying: “It is the first time that it happens in IOM.”
As for claims that he has not traveled much in his job, he said: “If I recall correctly, I have been 15 times to Africa until the end of 2022.”
“And I would like the critics to take into consideration that for two years, we were locked down – if they have already forgotten the pandemic.”
“I’m pretty confident that my work deserves to be supported and continuous,” he said, pointing out the key role the IOM is playing in Ukraine and Haiti, two of the world’s major crises.
He wants to continue reforms to improve the IOM’s efficiency and to make the organization more financially stable, as currently 95 percent of its budget depends on voluntary contributions from its member states, who pick which projects they fund.
The IOM must also adapt to new challenges, Vitorino said, such as the growing numbers of children migrating alone, migration flows linked to climate change, and even “digital nomads” – people working remotely from other countries.
And time is pressing because nowadays, “there are more people on the move because of climate change than because of conflicts,” he said.


US ambassador accuses Poland parliament speaker of insulting Trump

Updated 05 February 2026
Follow

US ambassador accuses Poland parliament speaker of insulting Trump

  • Tom Rose said the decision was made because of speaker Wlodzimierz Czarzasty’s “outrageous and unprovoked insults” against the US leader
  • “We will not permit anyone to harm US-Polish relations, nor disrespect (Trump),” Rose wrote on X

WARSAW: The United States embassy will have “no further dealings” with the speaker of the Polish parliament after claims he insulted President Donald Trump, its ambassador said on Thursday.
Tom Rose said the decision was made because of speaker Wlodzimierz Czarzasty’s “outrageous and unprovoked insults” against the US leader.
“We will not permit anyone to harm US-Polish relations, nor disrespect (Trump), who has done so much for Poland and the Polish people,” Rose wrote on X.
Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk responded the same day, writing on X: “Ambassador Rose, allies should respect, not lecture each other.”
“At least this is how we, here in Poland, understand partnership.”


On Monday, Czarzasty criticized a joint US-Israeli proposal to support Donald Trump’s candidacy for the Nobel Peace Prize.
“I will not support the motion for a Nobel Peace Prize for President Trump, because he doesn’t deserve it,” he told journalists.
Czarzasty said that rather than allying itself more closely with Trump’s White House, Poland should “strengthen existing alliances” such as NATO, the United Nations and the World Health Organization.
He criticized Trump’s leadership, including the imposition of tariffs on European countries, threats to annex Greenland, and, most recently, his claims that NATO allies had stayed “a little off the front lines” during the war in Afghanistan.
He accused Trump of “a breach of the politics of principles and values, often a breach of international law.”
After Rose’s reaction, Czarzasty told local news site Onet: “I maintain my position” on the issue of the peace prize.
“I consistently respect the USA as Poland’s key partner,” he added later on X.
“That is why I regretfully accept the statement by Ambassador Tom Rose, but I will not change my position on these fundamental issues for Polish women and men.”
The speaker heads Poland’s New Left party, which is part of Tusk’s pro-European governing coalition, with which the US ambassador said he has “excellent relations.”
It is currently governing under conservative-nationalist President Karol Nawrocki, a vocal Trump supporter.
In late January, Czarzasty, along with several other high-ranking Polish politicians, denounced Trump’s claim that the United States “never needed” NATO allies.
The parliamentary leader called the claims “scandalous” and said they should be “absolutely condemned.”
Forty-three Polish soldiers and one civil servant died as part of the US-led NATO coalition in Afghanistan.