Women's Day march in Islamabad marred by scuffles between police, attendees, media persons

Women holding placards at a Women's Day rally in Islamabad, Pakistan on March 8, 2023. (AN photo)
Short Url
Updated 08 March 2023
Follow

Women's Day march in Islamabad marred by scuffles between police, attendees, media persons

  • Pakistan’s interior minister suspends police personnel involved in baton-charging "Aurat March" attendees
  • Thousands of men, women lead protest rallies in many parts of the country to demand equal rights, security

ISLAMABAD: An annual International Women's Day march in Pakistan's capital was marred by violence on Wednesday, as scuffles broke out between police personnel, attendees of the march, and media persons as hundreds of women took to the streets to demand equal rights and an end to femicide.

The "Aurat March" (Women's March in Urdu) is an annual event that is held across Pakistan to observe International Women's Day on March 8. The pro-women rallies have faced a backlash from conservative forces since they first began in 2018. In 2021, blasphemy allegations were leveled at the marchers following tampered video clips of a demonstration that emerged on social media.

Despite the challenges, organizers maintain the march aims to raise awareness of pressing issues faced by Pakistani women, including violence and sexual exploitation. Nevertheless, the organizers have also faced serious backlash, including threats of murder and rape, highlighting the ongoing struggle for women's rights in Pakistan.




A man holds a placard at a Women's Day rally in Islamabad, Pakistan on March 8, 2023. (AN photo)

As scores of charged-up men, women, and transgenders chanted slogans demanding an end to patriarchy, scuffles broke out among marchers and police personnel when they attempted to cross a road blocked by containers and barbed wires but were stopped by police, who wanted to hold a security check for the marchers.  

In one of the videos that emerged on social media, police can be seen baton-charging marchers after a heated argument between both sides. In another video, the marchers can be seen hitting media persons with utensils as a brawl ensued between both sides.  

Taking notice of the incident, Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah said the police personnel involved in the baton-charging incident have been suspended. 

“The police personnel involved in baton-charging participants of the women's march have been suspended,” he said in a Twitter post, adding that others responsible would also face action. 

“It is very unfortunate as these gatherings should be peaceful in all cities and no one should commit violence against anyone,” Pakistan’s climate change minister, Sherry Rehman, told reporters as she arrived on the spot following the scuffles. 




Rights activist Tahira Abdullah speaks at a Women's Day rally in Islamabad, Pakistan on March 8, 2023. (AN photo)

Women's rights activist Tahira Abdullah criticized the Islamabad administration for torturing participants of the march. "We are unarmed and peaceful women as we do not carry guns or grenades like the Taliban but we are treated like terrorists,” Abdullah told Arab News.

She criticized the government for not issuing a no-objection certificate to the marchers despite them applying for it three months earlier. 

“We condemn and protest strongly and call upon Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, former president Asif Ali Zardari, and Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari to initiate an inquiry against Interior Minister Rana Sana Ullah and religious affairs minister, Mufti Abdul Shakoor, and force them to resign if they cannot give you an explanation,” she added.

Speaking to Arab News, Dr. Mariyam Mohsin, a participant, said for women to take to the streets to protest for their rights is the need of the hour. 

“The country in which a woman is raped in the federal capital and the city administration does not cooperate after that, then this is the barest of the minimum that we can do, to come on the streets for our rights,” she told Arab News. 

Hania Imran, a youth climate activist, said Pakistan had seen unprecedented floods last year which impacted millions of women who were still waiting for their homes to be reconstructed.

“Women were more affected than men because they are more marginalized and dependent,” she told Arab News, adding that they had gathered at the march to demand authorities include women in decisions related to climate change.

“They feel that we are not worthy of seeking advice on these issues which is not true for the modern women,” she added.

Speaking to Arab News from Peshawar, an Aurat March organizer, Saima Munir, said this year the activists in Pakistan's Peshawar city—the capital of the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province—were sensitizing women about their rights unconventionally by visiting different BRT (bus rapid transit) stations.

“We changed our way this year and instead of marching, we are gathering at different stations of the BRT to distribute pamphlets regarding women's rights and fight against harassment,” she said, adding that activists sensitized women in teams at different stations. 


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 57 min 11 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.