Pakistan court asks election body to ‘immediately announce’ date for Punjab polls

In this file photo taken on August 2, 2022, paramilitary soldiers stand guard outside the Pakistan’s election commission building in Islamabad. (Photo courtesy: AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 10 February 2023
Follow

Pakistan court asks election body to ‘immediately announce’ date for Punjab polls

  • Lahore High Court said the elections should be held within 90 days after the dissolution of the provincial assembly
  • Punjab Assembly dissolved on Jan. 14, though some government functionaries hinted at the possibility of delayed polls

ISLAMABAD: A Pakistani court directed the country’s election regulatory authority on Friday to “immediately announce” the date for Punjab polls while pointing out the constitution required the electoral contest to be held within 90 days of the dissolution of the provincial assembly.

The decision was given after former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party filed a petition in the Lahore High Court while requesting it to order the Punjab governor to announce the election date after the assembly was dissolved by former chief minister Chaudhry Parvez Elahi on January 14.

However, Governor Balighur Rehman told the court he was not required to announce the date since he had not acted on the chief minister’s advice to dissolve the provincial legislature which ceased to exist on its own 48 hours after Elahi signed the summary for its dissolution.

Justice Jawad Hassan of the Lahore High Court gave his verdict in the matter wherein he issued instructions for the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

“The ‘ECP’ is directed to immediately announce the ‘date of election’ of the Provisional Assembly of Punjab with the Notification specifying reasons, after consultation with the Governor of Punjab, being the constitutional Head of the Province, to ensure that the elections are held not later than ninety days as per the mandate of the ‘Constitution’,” said the 16-page verdict, a copy of which is available with Arab News.

The Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa assemblies were dissolved by the chief ministers of the two provinces on the instruction of former prime minister Imran Khan who wanted to build pressure on the federal government to call early nationwide elections.

However, there were suspicions that the administration in Islamabad was hoping to postpone the provincial polls after some government functionaries, including law minister Azam Nazir Tarar, hinted at the possibility of delaying the provincial polls while citing economic and political uncertainty in the country.

President Arif Alvi, a Khan ally, wrote a letter to Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja on Wednesday, asking him to announce the schedule for Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa polls without further delay.


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 57 min 11 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.