Climate ambitions should not be met at the expense of energy security: KAPSARC president

Fahad Alajlan, president of KAPSARC (AN)
Short Url
Updated 06 February 2023
Follow

Climate ambitions should not be met at the expense of energy security: KAPSARC president

RIYADH: The world should embrace a balanced approach where climate ambitions are met without compromising on energy security and affordability, a top official from the King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center has said.

In an exclusive interview with Arab News on the sidelines of the 44th conference of the International Association for Energy Economics, Fahad Alajlan, president of KAPSARC, said that Saudi Arabia is leading this balanced approach through programs like Saudi Green Initiative, clean energy investments, and decarbonization efforts. 

He also called for involving all stakeholders to find a solution to effectively fight climate change. 

According to Alajlan, climate change conferences like the UN’s COP should include oil and gas companies in their discussions as more than 50 percent of emissions are coming from the energy sector. 

The KAPSARC president said that Saudi Arabia is leapfrogging others in the carbon capture technology which will play a crucial role in the ongoing energy transition efforts. 

“In the past, oil and gas companies have been excluded from discussions. If we look at emissions today, more than 50 percent come from the energy sector, so it is very important that we involve oil and gas companies in this discussion, to become part of the solution rather than demonizing and excluding them,” said Alajlan. 

He added: “The COP 28 presidency in the UAE will be an inclusive COP. It will be a COP that brings everybody to be part of the solution. So, it is very important to get this inclusive approach.” 

Alajlan noted that carbon capture is not the only solution to reduce emissions, but it is a part of the solution which will ensure a sustainable future.

Carbon capture initiatives should be sufficiently complemented with renewables, hydrogen, and green efforts to get better sustainable results, he argued.

“It (carbon capture) is not the only solution; it is part of the solution. If we look today, there are about 50 commercial carbon capture projects globally. Saudi Arabia has one of the biggest with a capacity of 500,000 tons, but the ambition goes much bigger,” he said. 




Fahad Alajlan addressing the IAEE conference (Screenshot)

Saudi Arabian Oil Co.’s carbon capture and storage hub in the Kingdom is eyeing to have a storage capacity of up to 9 million tons of carbon dioxide a year by 2027, and 45 million tons by 2035, he further noted. 

According to Alajlan, the ongoing IAEE conference in Saudi Arabia is crucial, as it came at a time when the entire world is witnessing a new energy landscape post the invasion of Ukraine, which highlighted the vulnerabilities surrounding energy security. 

“There are many pathways to achieve climate ambition and energy transition. These pathways should ensure energy security, energy affordability, and climate change. The discussion here (IAEE conference) has focused on Saudi Arabia as an example of many pathways that exist. Saudi Arabia has pursued renewable energy, clean energy investment, and hydrogen,” he added.  

Alajlan also said that the issue of energy affordability is posing problems to energy transition even in the MENA region, and it should be seriously addressed. 

“We have a few countries that are struggling to meet their energy needs. The cost of energy has risen exceedingly in 2022. So, we need to make sure that this is being addressed. We cannot have winners and losers in this energy transition,” he added. 

According to Alajlan, energy financing is very much necessary for a smooth transition, as developed nations have agreed to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in developing economies for clean energy initiatives.  

“There are a lot of roles to be played by government and private sectors, but also global development institutions and multi-development institutions like the World Bank and the IMF (International Monetary Fund), and credit agencies, that would lend and finance these energy projects and make sure that energy is not only accessible but also affordable,” added Alajlan. 

He further noted that the $100 billion committed by developed economies for developing economies to catalyze energy transition is not sufficient, as it requires $3 trillion to $8 trillion annually. 

Talking about the importance of green financing in the energy sector, Alajlan said that the world should think about how green finance can be pushed into technologies like carbon capture, hydrogen, and ultimately energy transition. 

“We know the world is growing, energy demand is growing, and the issue of emissions is critical. So, we need to lower our emissions while growing the energy supply. We need more financing, whether that is in oil and gas, renewables and hydrogen,” he added. 

Alajlan asserted that the general public too should be aware of the necessity of energy transition so that they can also contribute their part to these efforts.


Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

Updated 09 February 2026
Follow

Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

ALULA: Global trade is not retreating into deglobalization despite geopolitical shocks, but is instead undergoing a structural reshuffling led by US-China tensions, according to Harvard University economist Pol Antras. 

Presenting research at the AlUla Emerging Market Economies Conference, Antras said there is no evidence that countries are systematically turning inward. Instead, trade flows are being redirected across markets, creating winners and losers depending on export structure and exposure to Chinese competition. 

This comes as debate intensifies over whether supply-chain disruptions, industrial policy and rising trade barriers signal the end of globalization after decades of expansion. 

Speaking to Arab News on the sidelines of the event, Antras said: “I think the right way to view it is more a reorganization, where things are moving from some countries to others rather than a general trend where countries are becoming more inward looking, in a sense of producers selling more of their stuff domestically than internationally, or consumers buying more domestic products than foreign products.”  

He said a change of that scale has not yet happened, which is important to recognize when navigating the reshuffling — a shift his research shows is driven by Chinese producers redirecting sales away from the US toward other economies. 

He added that countries are affected differently, but highlighted that the Kingdom’s position is relatively positive, stating: “In the case of Saudi Arabia, for instance, its export structure, what it exports, is very different than what China exports, so in that sense it’s better positioned so suffer less negative consequences of recent events.” 

He went on to say that economies likely to be more negatively impacted than the Kingdom would be those with more producers in sectors exposed to Chinese competition. He added that while many countries may feel inclined to follow the United States’ footsteps by implementing their own tariffs, he would advise against such a move.  

Instead, he pointed to supporting producers facing the shock as a better way to protect and prepare economies, describing it as a key step toward building resilience — a view Professor Antras underscored as fundamental. 

Elaborating on the Kingdom’s position amid rising tensions and structural reorganization, he said Saudi Arabia holds a relative advantage in its economic framework. 

“Saudi Arabia should not be too worried about facing increased competitive pressures in selling its exports to other markets, by its nature. On the other hand, there is a benefit of the current situation, which is when Chinese producers find it hard to sell in US market, they naturally pivot to other markets.” 

He said that pivot could benefit importing economies, including Saudi Arabia, by lowering Chinese export prices. The shift could increase the Kingdom’s import volumes from China while easing cost pressures for domestic producers.