‘Salt in wounds’: Prince Harry’s admission draws anger from Afghans

A woman leafs through the "En la sombra" (In the shadow) Spanish version of the book "Spare" an autbiography by Britain's Prince Harry after buying it in Madrid on January 5, 2023. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 07 January 2023
Follow

‘Salt in wounds’: Prince Harry’s admission draws anger from Afghans

  • Harry says he killed 25 people, ‘chess pieces’ taken off the board
  • 20 years of US-led NATO war killed more than 176,000 Afghans

KABUL: A mixture of anger, pain, and confusion has been felt by Afghans on hearing Prince Harry’s admission of killing more than two dozen people while on military duty in Afghanistan. 

The British royal served in Afghanistan, first as a forward air controller in 2007-08 and in 2012-13 when he was an Apache attack helicopter co-pilot gunner in the US-led NATO campaign against the Taliban. 

In his memoir “Spare,” from which the British media quoted on Friday prior to its global launch next week, the prince said he had killed 25 Taliban fighters, describing them as “chess pieces taken off the board, bad guys eliminated before they kill good guys.” 

The comment provoked outrage from Afghanistan’s current rulers, the Taliban, who seized power when foreign troops withdrew in August 2021. 

“The ones you killed were not chess pieces, they were humans; they had families who were waiting for their return,” prominent Taliban member Anas Haqqani said on Twitter. 

Suhail Shaheen, Taliban government spokesperson and permanent representative-designate to the UN, issued a statement accusing Prince Harry of being on the side of invaders and of committing crimes against humanity. 

Prince Harry’s words also reopened the wounds of those who lost family members during 20 years of war that killed more than 176,000 Afghans. 

“Hearing such news is like putting salt in our wounds. It’s not good, there is no benefit in doing so,” said Shaheen Fidaee, a resident of Kabul province, whose grandmother and uncle were killed during raids by foreign troops. 

“We suffered a lot of victims and hardship in the last two decades.” 

Akmal Khan, a social activist, saw Prince Harry’s admission of killing as just a “small example” of crimes by foreign troops in Afghanistan. 

“We can say hundreds of other similar incidents were committed by them across Afghanistan in the past two decades,” he told Arab News. 

Khan added the remarks in the royal’s memoir were a “huge insult to the entire Afghan nation.” 

Noor Mohammad, a street vendor in Kabul city, said: “He himself (Prince Harry) claimed he killed our countrymen as chess pieces. 

“It’s so painful for us to be hearing such news.” 

For Wahidullah, a shop owner in the Afghan capital, Prince Harry had “insulted all humans and the Afghan nation.” 

Wahidullah, along with Khan and Mohammad, told Arab News that the royal should face prosecution from the international authorities. 

But some believe he was taking part in a military mission and should not be judged until all the circumstances are clear. 

“The statement given by the UK’s Prince Harry is about incidents 10 years ago and during that period of war we had thousands of casualties in Afghanistan,” said Arzo Joya, who worked at an NGO before the Taliban banned women from such work in December. 

She was surprised, however, that Prince Harry remembered the number of those he had killed. 

“We should leave this issue for the future,” she said, “until we get to know how he had committed this.”


Trump withdraws US from dozens of international and UN entities

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Trump withdraws US from dozens of international and UN entities

  • “The United States would be the first country to walk away ⁠from the UNFCCC,” said Bapna
  • Trump has already largely slashed voluntary funding to most UN agencies

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the United States would withdraw from dozens of international and UN entities, including a key climate treaty and a UN body that promotes gender equality and women’s empowerment, because they “operate contrary to US national interests.”
Among the 35 non-UN groups and 31 UN entities Trump listed in a memo to senior administration officials is the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change — described by many as the “bedrock” climate treaty which is parent agreement to the 2015 Paris climate deal.
The United States skipped the annual UN international climate summit last year for the first time in three decades.
“The United States would be the first country to walk away ⁠from the UNFCCC,” said Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council.
“Every other nation is a member, in part because they recognize that even beyond the moral imperative of addressing climate change, having a seat at the table in those negotiations represents an ability to shape massive economic policy and opportunity,” said Bapna.
The US will also quit UN Women, which works for gender equality and the empowerment of women, and the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), the international body’s agency focused on family planning as well as maternal ⁠and child health in more than 150 countries. The US cut its funding for the UNFPA last year.
“For United Nations entities, withdrawal means ceasing participation in or funding to those entities to the extent permitted by law,” reads the memo. Trump has already largely slashed voluntary funding to most UN agencies.
A spokesperson for UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

TRUMP WARY OF MULTILATERAL ORGANISATIONS
Trump’s move reflects his long-standing wariness of multilateral institutions, particularly the United Nations. He has repeatedly questioned the effectiveness, cost and accountability of international bodies, arguing they often fail to serve US interests.
Since beginning his second term a year ago, Trump has sought to slash US funding for the United Nations, stopped US engagement with the UN Human Rights Council, extended a halt to ⁠funding for the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA and quit the UN cultural agency UNESCO. He has also announced plans to quit the World Health Organization and the Paris climate agreement.
Other entities on the US list are the UN Conference on Trade and Development, the International Energy Forum, the UN Register of Conventional Arms and the UN Peacebuilding Commission.
The White House said the dozens of entities that Washington was seeking to depart as soon as possible promote “radical climate policies, global governance, and ideological programs that conflict with US sovereignty and economic strength.”
It said the move is part of a review of all international intergovernmental organizations, conventions and treaties.
“These withdrawals will end American taxpayer funding and involvement in entities that advance globalist agendas over US priorities, or that address important issues inefficiently or ineffectively such that US taxpayer dollars are best allocated in other ways to support the relevant missions,” the White House said in a statement.