Tunisian election to entrench president’s rule

Employees load ballot boxes into a supervised military truck that will transport them to a polling station in the district of Ariana near Tunis. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 17 December 2022
Follow

Tunisian election to entrench president’s rule

  • Tunisia holds a parliamentary election on Saturday that will tighten President Kais Saied's grip on power
  • The ballot bolsters a new political order following Saied's dissolution last year of the previous legislature

TUNIS: Tunisians go to the polls Saturday to elect a parliament largely stripped of its powers, under a hyper-presidential system installed by the head of state Kais Saied after his power grab last year.
Over a decade since Tunisia’s popular revolution unseated dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, opposition parties have urged a boycott of the vote, which they say is part of a “coup” against the only democracy to have emerged from the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings.
The election for the new 161-seat assembly comes after President Saied froze the previous legislature on July 25 last year, following months of political crisis exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic.
He later dissolved the parliament, which had long been dominated by his nemesis the Islamist-inspired Ennahdha party.
Saied on Wednesday defended his decision, saying that the “Tunisian people, wherever I went, were all asking to dissolve the parliament.”
“The country was on the brink of civil war,” he told US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Washington.
The previous legislature had far-reaching powers, in the mixed presidential-parliamentary system enshrined in the North African country’s post-revolution constitution.
Last July, Saied used a widely shunned referendum to push through a new constitution, stripping parliament of any real clout and giving his own office almost unlimited powers.
The legal expert who oversaw its drafting said the version Saied published had been changed in a way that could lead to a “dictatorial regime.” Saied later published a slightly amended draft.
Analyst Hamadi Redissi said the aim of Saturday’s polls was “to complete the process that started on July 25” last year.
The resulting parliament “won’t have many powers — it won’t be able to appoint a government or censure it, except under draconian conditions that are almost impossible to meet.”
Saied’s new system essentially does away with political parties and electoral lists, meaning candidates will be elected as individuals with no declared affiliation.
He appoints the prime minister under the new constitution — a departure from the previous system which gave parliament a central role in picking the cabinet.
The assembly’s final make-up is not expected to be determined until March next year, after any second-round run-offs have been completed.
The vote aims “to increase the legitimacy of the presidency,” Redissi said, adding that the result would be “a rump parliament without any powers.”
Almost all the country’s political parties, including Ennahdha, have said they will boycott the vote, labelling Saied’s moves a “coup.”
The head of the National Salvation Front, the main opposition alliance which includes Ennahdha, said the bloc would not recognize the results.
The elections “will plunge the country even further into political crisis,” Ahmed Nejib Chebbi told journalists in Tunis on Thursday.
He also voiced alarm over the postponement of a critical International Monetary Fund meeting next Monday, at which the Washington-based lender was to decide on a bailout package for the deeply indebted North African country.
The delay “threatens the country’s economic balance,” he said.
The powerful UGTT trade union federation, which did not openly oppose the initial power grab, has called the poll meaningless.
Most of the 1,058 candidates are unknowns.
The Tunisian Observatory for Democratic Transition says some 26 percent are teachers, and a further 22 are mid-level public servants.
The election result will likely see a drop in the representation of women, with just 122 female candidates.
Nejib Chebbi, head of an anti-Saied coalition including Ennahda, said the election amounted to a “a still-born farce,” and the result seems unlikely to have any impact on government policy.
Al Bawsala, a non-governmental organization that has monitored the work of parliament, has said it will boycott the new legislature which it believes will be an instrument for the president.
Few of the country’s nine million registered voters are expected to turn out.
Several young people told AFP they had little interest in the election or desire to know more about the candidates.
Marwa Ben Miled, a 53-year-old shopkeeper, told AFP the country was “going from bad to worse.”
“What happens on the political scene doesn’t interest me anymore,” she said. “I don’t trust anyone.”
Tunis construction worker Mohamed Salmi said he did not plan to vote. “They have made our lives hell ... Our ultimate dream has become to find a bottle of milk for our children,” he told Reuters.
Saied’s electoral law forbids candidates from speaking to the foreign press, a stance the North Africa Foreign Correspondents’ Club said would make it difficult for journalists to do their jobs.
Saied has made several public appearances, meeting market traders in the Old City of Tunis in the run-up to the vote.
Some social media users have posted satirical images ridiculing the vote.
In one video, a mock candidate appears with a cigar and smelling a posy of jasmine, before giving a donation to a pair of musicians who then shout pro-Saied slogans.
(With AFP and Reuters)


Inaction over UAE’s role is prolonging ‘worst proxy war in the world,’ Sudan justice minister says

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Inaction over UAE’s role is prolonging ‘worst proxy war in the world,’ Sudan justice minister says

  • Had international community characterized it as ‘military rebellion’ and countered Emirati sponsorship of ‘terrorist militia’ it would not have endured, he tells UN Human Rights Council
  • He accuses paramilitary Rapid Support forces of ‘targeting basic infrastructure, strategic facilities and public services,’ and ‘atrocities beyond our capacity to describe’

NEW YORK CITY: Sudan’s justice minister on Wednesday blamed the prolongation of the near-three-year conflict in his country on what he described as the failure of the international community to properly label the war as a rebellion.

He also accused the UAE of sponsoring and arming a militia, the Rapid Support Forces, he said was responsible for widespread abuses.

“The war has outstayed its welcome and it should not have gone on for this long had the international community, and particularly the UN and its bodies, fulfilled their responsibility in rightly characterizing this military rebellion,” said Abdullah Mohammed Dirif, “and had they called a spade a spade and countered the Abu Dhabi government, which sponsored this terrorist militia and provided it with high-tech arms and provided it with mercenaries.”

Speaking during the high-level segment of the 61st session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, he warned that “the misleading characterization of this war has given a green light for the militia to keep its flagrant violations.”

The minister, who said he was speaking “on behalf of the government of Sudan and its people,” described the conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the RSF, which began in April 2023, as “one of the worst proxy wars in the world,” which had “targeted the very existence of Sudan and its people.”

The RSF has “continued its methodic targeting of basic infrastructure and strategic facilities and all public services,” Dirif said, adding that “the aim is to displace civilians against whom it has committed atrocities beyond our capacity to describe them.

“The violations and crimes of the militia are going unabated. Yesterday it invaded Moustahiliya region in northern Darfur. It targeted civilians, killed them. It looted. It scorched villages and cities.”

Sudan’s military was “conducting its constitutional responsibility by standing up to the militia, protecting the civilians, preserving the unity of the country and the rule of law,” he said, and it remains “committed to international humanitarian law and the rules governing military engagement, and taking into account proportionality principles in order to protect civilians.”

Khartoum remains “open to genuine efforts which aim to end the war and the rebellion” based on a road map presented by the president of the Transitional Sovereignty Council, and a peace initiative submitted by the prime minister to the UN Security Council on Dec. 22, he added.

Dirif stressed his government’s commitment to continued “cooperation and coordination with human rights mechanisms in Sudan,” including the presence of the UN’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in the country and the UN special rapporteur on the human rights situation in Sudan.

“We recall, nationally, that achieving justice and redress to victims and ensuring impunity is a top priority for us,” he said, adding that authorities had made progress by investigating violations of national laws and international humanitarian laws.

He also underscored Sudan’s “commitment to continue facilitating and expediting delivery of humanitarian assistance to those affected by the war, including those under the control of the rebellious militia.”

Later, Sudan’s representative to the UN in Geneva exercised his right of reply and responded to prior remarks by the representative from the UAE.

“This is not a mere accusation, it is a well-known fact that is predicated on a number of evidence and documented proofs,” he said, referring to the UAE’s sponsorship of the RSF.

He cited in particular a report by a UN panel of experts on Sudan published on Jan. 15, 2024, which he described as “an official document of the Security Council” that referred to “lines of transferring weapons from Abu Dhabi International Airport” based on “clear-cut evidence.”

Other major international organizations and Sudan’s national commission of inquiry have provided further proof, he added, and Khartoum had submitted “a number of complaints, with proof, to the Security Council of the proven sabotage by the Abu Dhabi authority.”

The Sudanese representative continued: “It is paradoxical that the same authority that is sponsoring criminal militia, that the whole world is seeing and is attesting to its crimes, is now talking about peace in the Sudan. Peace is a noble value, that you have to be full of peace before you talk about it.

“The people of Sudan are only requesting this country stop sponsoring this criminal militia that is killing the innocent people in my country on a daily basis.”

The UAE has denied accusations that it provides military support to armed groups in Sudan, and says it supports efforts to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict.