Rights group challenges Truss plan to move British Embassy to Jerusalem

Truss told the Israeli prime minister in September that the UK was reviewing the embassy’s location. (FIle/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 October 2022
Follow

Rights group challenges Truss plan to move British Embassy to Jerusalem

  • ICJP says it would seek judicial review to prevent ‘violation of international law’

LONDON: A Palestinian rights group has warned the British prime minister that it plans to seek a judicial review if the UK announces it will move its embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. 

The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians wrote to Liz Truss with a comprehensive legal opinion prepared by human rights law firm Bindmans LLP and four barristers from Essex Court Chambers and Doughty Street Chambers.   

It comes after Truss told Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapin in September that the UK was reviewing the embassy’s location.

Her statement drew international concern and was criticized by 50 British Jewish youth leaders, several Arab diplomats in the UK, and members of her own Conservative Party. William Hague, a former leader, and Alistair Burt, a former Middle East minister and treasurer of the Conservative Friends of Israel group have both opposed any move.

The ICJP letter heaps further pressure on a prime minister who has already crashed the economy in her first weeks in power with an uncosted mini-budget that cut taxes for the rich.

“This opinion of independent legal counsel, expert in their field, reinforces the massive concentration of diplomatic, religious and political concern over the review around moving the UK’s embassy to Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem,” said Crispin Blunt, a Conservative MP and a director of ICJP.  

“The fact that the UK is apparently seriously considering this is already causing serious reputational damage, not least to our inherited responsibilities to be at least balanced to Palestinian aspirations that have been so betrayed in the grim reality that has followed in the century since the Balfour Declaration.” 

The independent legal opinion obtained by the ICJP considers Jerusalem’s special status under international law, as well the international legal ramifications of relocating.

It states that there are strong grounds to conclude that a move would imply recognition of Israel’s claim, under its Basic Law of 1980, that the city is “complete and united” as the its capital. 

The statement has been repeatedly declared invalid by the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council, which says the law constitutes a violation of international law. 

The legal opinion also states that a move would violate British obligations under the Geneva Conventions to “not encourage, aid, or assist another state in violating the conventions.”

Tayab Ali, an ICJP director and a partner at Bindmans LLP, said: “The prime minister has demonstrated over the last few weeks the dangers of carelessly announcing policies that are not thought through and without proper consultation. The prime minister should not approach international situations in the same way. 

“We cannot as a country champion the Ukrainian fight for freedom … and then create policy for Israel which so badly undermines the British assertion of the primacy of international law and the UN charter.  The consequences of carelessness at this level would be unthinkable.”


Aoun hails disarmament progress: ‘Lebanon achieved in 1 year what it had not seen in 4 decades’

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Aoun hails disarmament progress: ‘Lebanon achieved in 1 year what it had not seen in 4 decades’

  • President Joseph Aoun highlights achievements during first year in office despite many challenges
  • Army announced this month it had successfully disarmed Hezbollah in the south of the country

BEIRUT: Lebanese President Joseph Aoun confirmed on Tuesday that the country’s armed forces “are now the sole operational authority south of the Litani River, despite doubts, accusations of treason, insults and slander.”

Speaking at the Presidential Palace in Baabda during a traditional New Year meeting with members of the diplomatic corps and the heads of international missions, he highlighted what he viewed as Lebanon’s achievements since he took office on Jan. 9, 2025.

The government’s approval in August and September last year of plans to bring all weapons in the country under state control, and ensure the authority of the state across all Lebanese territory using its own forces, was “no minor detail,” he said.

“Lebanon achieved in one year what it had not seen in four decades,” he added, as he recalled taking office in a “deeply wounded state” that has suffered decades of institutional paralysis and economic crises.

Despite campaigns of distortion, intimidation and misinformation, and Israel’s failure to abide by the November 2024 ceasefire agreement, the changed reality on the ground over the past 12 months speaks for itself, he said.

“The truth is what you see, not what you hear,” Aoun said, pointing out that “not a single bullet was fired from Lebanon during my first year in office, except for two specific incidents recorded last March, the perpetrators of which were swiftly arrested by official authorities.”

The army carried out “extensive operations” to clear large areas of the country of illegal weapons regardless of who controlled them, the president continued, in line with the terms of the Nov. 27 ceasefire agreement with Israel, which he described as “an accord Lebanon respects and that was unanimously endorsed by the country’s political forces.”

These efforts reflected a determination to spare the country a return to the “suicidal conflicts that have come at a heavy cost in the past,” he added.

Aoun stressed his commitment during the second year of his presidency to restoring control of all Lebanese territory to the exclusive authority of the state, securing the release of prisoners, and the reconstruction of war-ravaged areas.

He said that southern Lebanon, like all of the country’s international borders, would fall under the sole control of the Lebanese Armed Forces, putting a definitive end to any attempts “to draw us into the conflicts of others, even as those same parties pursue dialogue, negotiations and compromises in pursuit of their own national interests.”

The Lebanese Army Command announced early this month the completion of the first phase of its plans to disarm nonstate groups south of the Litani River. The government is now awaiting an army report next month detailing its next steps.

Gen. Rodolphe Haykal, the army’s commander, has said that the plan “does not have a specific time frame for completing this phase, which encompasses all Lebanese regions.”

A Lebanese official confirmed to Arab News that the army now has exclusive control of territory south of the Litani River, and no other armed forces or military factions have a presence there.

Aoun’s affirmation of his determination to “stay on course” came two days after Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem gave a sharply worded speech that delivered both implicit and explicit rebukes aimed at the president and Foreign Minister Youssef Raji.

His criticisms focused on their efforts to take control of weapons north of the Litani River, following a declaration by Aoun that “the time for arms is over,” a position that Hezbollah vehemently rejects in what appears to be an attempt to derail the gradual, phased disarmament strategy embraced by the Lebanese government and the international community.

Progress in the efforts of the military to take control of all weapons in the country hinges on securing vital logistical support for the country’s armed forces, a condition tied to the International Conference for Supporting the Lebanese Army and Internal Security Forces, which is due to take place on March 5 in Paris.

Aoun told the diplomats that the conference is the result of efforts led by the international Quintet Committee supporting Lebanon: the US, Saudi Arabia, France, Qatar and Egypt.

Archbishop Paolo Borgia, the papal ambassador to Lebanon, speaking in his role as dean of the diplomatic corps, said that the current crisis in the country serves “as a harsh test” that must remind political leaders of their duty to prevent history from repeating itself.

He called for respect for all electoral processes as a vital part of any nation’s democratic life, and for “genuine peace without weapons, one that can disarm enemies through the convincing power of goodness and the strength of meeting and dialogue.”

He added: “Those holding the highest public offices must give special attention to rebuilding political relationships peacefully, both nationally and globally, a process grounded in mutual trust, honest negotiations and faithful adherence to commitments made.”