Lebanon releases man who held bank employees hostage

Bassam Al-Sheikh Hussein, walked into the bank brandishing a gun demanding his money. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 16 August 2022
Follow

Lebanon releases man who held bank employees hostage

  • It was decided to release Al-Sheikh Hussein on bail and refer his case to the investigating judge in Beirut

BEIRUT: A man who broke into a Beirut bank and held its employees hostage was released on Tuesday by Lebanon’s prosecutor general.

Bassam Al-Sheikh Hussein broke into the Federal Bank last Thursday using a pump-action shotgun and gasoline, threatening to set himself and the place alight if he did not receive his bank deposit in US dollars.

He held employees hostage for about eight hours before the bank responded to his request and gave him $35,000 of his $209,000 deposit.

Roy Madkour, Federal Bank’s lawyer, headed to the public prosecution office Tuesday morning and dropped the bank’s rights. It was then decided to release Al-Sheikh Hussein on bail and refer his case to the investigating judge in Beirut.

Al-Sheikh Hussein headed to his house without meeting the reporters or activists who had gathered outside the Directorate General of the Internal Security Forces’ headquarters to receive him.

Georges Khattar, who waited outside the directorate’s headquarters where Al-Sheikh Hussein was detained to follow up on the situation, told Arab News: “Releasing Al-Sheikh Hussein technically means that he is not subject to prosecution anymore. That is what usually happens.”




Crowds gathered outside the bank to show their support for Bassam Al-Sheikh Hussein. (File/AFP) 

 

Activists and the detainee’s family protested Tuesday morning to demand his release.

Al-Sheikh Hussein did not appoint a lawyer during his detention period. He said he would go on hunger strike if he were not released. He also threatened to hang himself.

The Internal Security Forces had promised Al-Sheikh Hussein that he would be allowed to walk free because of the negotiations inside the bank and after his family received a part of his deposit.

After leaving the bank, however, he was transferred to the Directorate General of the Internal Security Forces. He was questioned about the source of the pump-action shotgun and the circumstances of the break-in.

Al-Sheikh Hussein’s move was praised by those whose dollar deposits have been seized by banks since 2019.

But economic expert Louis Hobeika did not regard the outcome as a “good deal.”

Hobeika told Arab News: “It’s true that the depositor received $35,000 from his bank deposit. However, the bank calculated this amount as per the Sayrafa platform rate.

“This means that the bank deducted $116,000 from Al-Sheikh Hussein’s bank deposit, estimated at $210,000, as it adopted the rate of LBP8,000 against the dollar and then proceeded to sell him the amount for $35,000 as per the rate on the Central Bank’s Sayrafa platform, which is LBP26,000 against the dollar.

“That is, the value of the amount given to the depositor by the bank equals three times the real value of the amount. Al-Sheikh Hussein lost $91,000 of his deposit and only received $35,000.”

He said although Al-Sheikh Hussein was wrong to act the way he did, he had not broken into the bank to steal.

“He wanted to retrieve his deposit and pay his father’s hospital bills. All people have seized deposits in banks. I blame the government, the banks, and the Central Bank for what’s happening. People are being treated unjustly and, for three years now, this injustice has not been addressed.

“How can people facing financial constraints similar to Al-Sheikh Hussein solve their problems if their money is seized by banks and cannot be accessed? If people had access to their deposits, their lives would have been different.”

People and depositors from the southern region of Aytaroun, where Al-Sheikh Hussein is from, protested in solidarity with the detainee. They released a statement calling on the judiciary to “be fair and just and give everyone their due.”

They emphasized the need for people to access their deposits and carried signs that said: “We reject banks and their cartels.”

They also blasted “the wrong economic policies adopted by the political ruling class” supported by successive governments and the banking sector that had caused the “theft” of depositors’ rights.


Gaza fuel running short after Israel closes borders amid Iran war

Gaza is wholly ‌dependent on fuel ‌brought in by trucks from Israel ​and ‌Egypt.
Updated 57 min 46 sec ago
Follow

Gaza fuel running short after Israel closes borders amid Iran war

  • Israel’s military closed all Gaza border crossings on Saturday after announcing air strikes on Iran carried out jointly with the US
  • Israeli authorities say the crossings cannot be operated safely during war

CAIRO/JERUSALEM: Gaza is rapidly running out of its limited fuel supply and stocks of food staples may become tight, officials say, after Israel blocked the ​entry of fuel and goods into the war-shattered territory, citing fighting with Iran.
Israel’s military closed all Gaza border crossings on Saturday after announcing air strikes on Iran carried out jointly with the United States. Israeli authorities say the crossings cannot be operated safely during war and have not said how long they would be shut.
Few days’ worth of supplies
Gaza is wholly ‌dependent on fuel ‌brought in by trucks from Israel ​and ‌Egypt ⁠and a ​lack ⁠of fresh supplies would put hospital operations at risk and threaten water and sanitation services, local officials say. Most Palestinians in Gaza are internally displaced after Israel’s two-year war with Hamas militants.
“I expect we have maybe a couple of days’ running time,” said United Nations official Karuna Herrmann, who directs fuel distribution in Gaza.
Amjad ⁠Al-Shawa, a Palestinian aid leader in Gaza, ‌who works with the UN and NGOs, ‌estimated fuel supplies could last three or ​four days, while stocks ‌of vegetables, flour, and other essentials could also soon run out ‌if the crossings remain shut.
Reuters was unable to independently verify those estimates.
Israel’s COGAT military agency, which controls access to Gaza, said that enough food had been delivered to the territory since the start of ‌an October truce to provide for the population.
“(The) existing stock is expected to suffice for ⁠an extended period,” ⁠COGAT said, without elaborating. It declined to comment on potential fuel shortages.
The truce was part of broader US-backed plan to end the war that involves reopening the Rafah border crossing with Egypt, increasing the flow of aid into the enclave, and rebuilding it.
Hamada Abu Laila, a displaced Palestinian in Gaza, said the closures were stoking fear of a return of famine, which gripped parts of the enclave last year after Israel blocked aid deliveries for 11 weeks.
“Why is it our fault, in ​Gaza, with regional wars ​between Israel, Iran, and America? It is not our fault,” Abu Laila said.